| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
|
76
|
Fri May 17 21:44:39 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | General | Beam issues | We do not have beam, and we have some instability during last 1-1.5 hour. |
|
66
|
Fri May 17 00:15:24 2024 |
Ahmed, Zidarova, Kalaidjieva | Runs | Beam gone | HHT called and said they have problems and need to enter the cave, so they stop the beam for some time
Beam Stop 00:10
Beam back 01:01 |
|
65
|
Thu May 16 23:08:34 2024 |
Ahmed, Zidarova | Runs | Beam dropped | Beam dropped between 23:00 and 23:05 |
|
45
|
Thu May 16 10:18:14 2024 |
Mayr, Hannes | Runs | Beam back, DAQ off | Beam is back since 10:10, but DAQ is turned off to change the setting there.
Measurements starting at 10:18 are only test runs and should not be used for analysis. |
|
69
|
Fri May 17 16:42:00 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | General | Beam back | Beam is back at 16:38.
We are changing the setting. |
|
85
|
Sat May 18 00:15:44 2024 |
Yoshi, Ohnishi | General | Beam back | Beam is back, but it stopped again at 0:17...... |
|
100
|
Sun May 19 12:04:55 2024 |
Kanika | Accelerator | Beam back | The beam is back. |
|
104
|
Sun May 19 17:48:15 2024 |
xing xu, hongfu, shahab | Runs | Beam back | beam is back, first file 17:47 |
|
112
|
Tue May 21 03:27:21 2024 |
K.Takiura Y.Kikuchi | Runs | Beam back | 03:26 Beam is back. |
|
81
|
Fri May 17 22:48:14 2024 |
Jelena B | Accelerator | Back to old setting | We go back to the Zr-settings to make a deffinite state of ESR and we move again to previous setting (Sr) |
|
29
|
Wed May 15 17:22:43 2024 |
Jeroen, Shahab, Johan | Runs | 98Mo run | Beam tuned at 4:50, data acquisition aligned for 98Mo at 4:56. |
|
88
|
Sat May 18 01:57:44 2024 |
Weick | Accelerator | 96Sr isoc setting | We fist verified the ESR after a crash with the 98Zr setting, was fine good resolution,
then we scaled to 96Sr directly at gamma_t not with shift as before.
E_SIS = 449.21 MeV/u for 100Mo 38+
after target = 373.36 MeV/u for 96Sr 38+
in ESR = 373.60 MeV/u for 96Sr 38+
in the LISE calculation this leads to gamma = 1.40082 as before in the other settings.
yield is very low now, but some lines. |
|
74
|
Fri May 17 19:43:03 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P., Shahab, David | Analysis | + Beam issues | Important - analysis
-> we are trying to get PID with a new setting to see if 98Zr decays with 30s half-life
--> we are taking 1 min cycles
---> strongest line does not corespondents to 96Sr38+ as it decays very fast (few seconds) and we observe long-lived one - still we have to confirm this
----> analysis is still ongoing
We lost the beam at 19:35
|
|