HOME
ESR
EXPERIMENTS
LABS etc
|
E121
E127
E132
E125
E143
laser_cooling_2021
E142
Ê128
E146
E0052
E0018
E0028
E0038
E0075
E0203_E0018
E0052_2025
|
Nuclear hyperfine mixing in 229Th89+ 2025 |
Not logged in |
 |
|
Message ID: 46
Entry time: Sun Jun 22 21:36:48 2025
|
Author: |
Carsten, Finn, Zac, Esther |
Category: |
Runs |
Subject: |
First laser scans |
|
|
Scan parameters:
scan range | 551.91 - 549.41
|
positions | 501
|
step width | 0.005nm
|
advance after | 15 rising edges
|
iterations | 1
|
rev. frequency | 1.54315e6
|
Note: When doing the accumulation in the ESR the particle number (observed in Lassie Monitor) seems to saturate. This is not actually the case but just an effect of the real signal being buried in other species.
Time | Part. Det. Int | SIS-intensity | accumulations in ESR | cooler-HV PTB | cooler-HV ? | LMD-DAQ1 Files | LMD-DAQ2 Files | scan range(nm) | number of positions | dwell time (laser shots) | n loops | checked laser position | comments
|
22:33 | 10800 | 1.25e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 106 | 0136 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
22:50 | 10800 | 1.3e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 107 | 0137 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
23:07 | 14000 | 1.3e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 108 | 0138 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
23:24 | 11500 | 1.3e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 109 | 0139 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
23:40 | 13100 | 1.3e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 110 | 0140 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
23:57 | 13100 | 1.3e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 111 | 0141 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
00:14 | 12700 | 1.4e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 112 | 0142 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
00:31 | 13500 | 1.4e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 113 | 0143 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
00:48 | 10700 | 1.25e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 114 | 0144 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | -
|
01:05 | - | 1.0e9 | 60 | 104513 | 104509 | 115 | 0145 | 551.91 - 549.41 | 501 | 15 | 1 | yes | BAD FILE(?): beam was killed as some point during the scan, we don't know why; no counts on the particle detector
|
|