ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Year |
255
|
Mon Mar 23 16:21:33 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run107 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 167.5mm | |
Detector: 90
Source: Am241
Distance: 167.5mm
Start time: 15:46:49 23.03.2020
Stop time: 17:32 23.03.2020
file name: run107_xxxx.lmd
avrg. rate: 610Hz
dead-time: 7%
not Gaussian shaped peaks, after previous investigations with the scope, the scope is disconnected.
Just to mention, in order to improve deadtime the other two Xray dets are disconnected. |
254
|
Mon Mar 23 16:17:58 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run106 - garbage! | |
run106 was clicked by accident, please delete! |
253
|
Mon Mar 23 15:48:15 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run105 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 167.5mm, wrong? | |
Detector: 90
Source: Am241
Distance: 167.5mm
Start time: 15:46:49 23.03.2020
Stop time:
file name: run105_xxxx.lmd
avrg. rate: 610Hz
dead-time: 7.5%
suspiciously not Gaussian shaped peaks --> investigation with oscilloscope |
251
|
Mon Mar 23 14:32:03 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | runs_100to104 NO-SCRAPER RESULTS | |
Without scraper, we have very few (p,g) counts, hard to get numbers quickly, maybe ~50.
X-rays look fine! |
Attachment 1: 124Xe_Si_map.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 124Xe_Si_projection.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 124Xe_x-ray_35.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 124Xe_x-ray_90.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 124Xe_x-ray_145.png
|
|
250
|
Mon Mar 23 14:23:01 2020 |
Pierre-Michel | DAQ | Backup recoil files | |
Recoil detector files backup to lxg1260:/data.local2/hillenbrand/Laszlo |
249
|
Mon Mar 23 14:12:54 2020 |
Ragan | Runs | E127 experiment stops | |
close file : run104 (14:12:44)
E127 experiment finishes on a successful note )) Congratulations to the entire team !! |
248
|
Mon Mar 23 14:12:18 2020 |
E127 team | Runs | run entry - run103, scrapper is inserted | |
open file : run103
Scrapper is inserted |
247
|
Mon Mar 23 14:02:07 2020 |
Ragan | Runs | run entry - run104, scrapper is removed | |
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
we run at MAX INTENSITY as we can: SIS was increased to its top, but unfortunately we still end up with 1.5e9 at injection from SIS. Sergey also optimized some stuff.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER OFF --> this leakage current spikes associated with primary scattering from the scraper edge seem to disappear, but we get still 10kHz rate on the detector a few sec after injection(this small "bump"
after the peak in the Si current - see the picture below)
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at , first file: run102_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 14:02
ON Rates
Si_X: 0 Hz
Si_Y: 0 Hz
Xray_35: 00 Hz
Xray_90: 34 Hz
Xray_145: 47 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.34 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 3.13e9
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 1.71e7? (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 3.95e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
246
|
Mon Mar 23 13:42:18 2020 |
Ragan | Runs | run entry - run104, scrapper is removed | |
open file : run104
Scrapper is removed |
245
|
Mon Mar 23 13:40:16 2020 |
Ragan | Runs | run entry - run103, scrapper moved by accident | |
open file : run103
Scrapper was put back and than taken out again by miscommunication. run103 is made while using the scraper |
244
|
Mon Mar 23 13:26:59 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | runs_90to99 SCRAPER RESULTS | |
With scraper, we have roughly 150-200 (p,g) counts now.
X-rays look fine! |
Attachment 1: 124Xe_Si_map.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 124Xe_x-ray_35.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 124Xe_x-ray_90.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 124Xe_x-ray_145.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 124Xe_Si_projection.png
|
|
243
|
Mon Mar 23 13:23:59 2020 |
Ragan, RuiJiu, Pierre-Michel | Runs | run entry - run102 | |
open file : run102
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
we run at MAX INTENSITY as we can: SIS was increased to its top, but unfortunately we still end up with 1.5e9 at injection from SIS. Sergey also optimized some stuff.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER OFF --> this leakage current spikes associated with primary scattering from the scraper edge seem to disappear, but we get still 10kHz rate on the detector a few sec after injection(this small "bump"
after the peak in the Si current - see the picture below)
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 12:49, first file: run102_0001.lmd
run stop at ,13:38 last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 13:24
ON Rates
Si_X: 1 Hz
Si_Y: 1 Hz
Xray_35: 10 Hz
Xray_90: 34 Hz
Xray_145: 22 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.32 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 2e9
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 1.44e7? (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 4.07e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
242
|
Mon Mar 23 12:54:02 2020 |
Pierre-Michel, Laszlo | Runs | run entry - run102 | |
open file : run102
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
we run at MAX INTENSITY as we can: SIS was increased to its top, but unfortunately we still end up with 1.5e9 at injection from SIS. Sergey also optimized some stuff.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER OFF --> this leakage current spikes associated with primary scattering from the scraper edge seem to disappear, but we get still 10kHz rate on the detector a few sec after injection(this small "bump"
after the peak in the Si current - see the picture below)
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 12:49, first file: run102_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 12:55
ON Rates
Si_X: 1 Hz
Si_Y: 1 Hz
Xray_35: 2 Hz
Xray_90: 70 Hz
Xray_145: 50 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.31 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 2.7e9
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 1.5e6? (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 4.6e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
241
|
Mon Mar 23 12:30:39 2020 |
laszlo | Analysis | with and without scraper | |
|
Attachment 1: 124Xe_with_scraper_3D.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 124Xe_with_scraper_2D.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 124Xe_without_scraper_2D.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 124Xe_without_scraper_3D.png
|
|
240
|
Mon Mar 23 11:35:52 2020 |
Laszlo,Sergey | Runs | run entry - run102 | |
open file : run102
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
we run at MAX INTENSITY as we can: SIS was increased to its top, but unfortunately we still end up with 1.5e9 at injection from SIS. Sergey also optimized some stuff.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER OFF
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 10:12, first file: run101_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 11:08
ON Rates
Si_X: 1 Hz
Si_Y: 1 Hz
Xray_35: 2 Hz
Xray_90: 62 Hz
Xray_145: 26 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.29 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 2.7e8
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 7e6? (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 4.2e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
239
|
Mon Mar 23 11:32:42 2020 |
Laszlo | General | SIS went down again | |
run101 is stopped |
238
|
Mon Mar 23 11:17:42 2020 |
Laszlo,Sergey | Runs | run entry - run101 | |
open file : run101
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
we run at MAX INTENSITY as we can: SIS was increased to its top, but unfortunately we still end up with 1.5e9 at injection from SIS. Sergey also optimized some stuff.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER OFF --> this leakage current spikes associated with primary scattering from the scraper edge seem to disappear, but we get still 10kHz rate on the detector a few sec after injection(this small "bump"
after the peak in the Si current - see the picture below)
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 10:12, first file: run101_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 11:08
ON Rates
Si_X: 1 Hz
Si_Y: 1 Hz
Xray_35: 2 Hz
Xray_90: 62 Hz
Xray_145: 26 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.29 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 2.7e8
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 7e6? (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 4.2e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
Attachment 1: 2020-03-23_11-19-53-652.png
|
|
Attachment 2: injection_current_spike_withoutScraper.png
|
|
237
|
Mon Mar 23 11:00:29 2020 |
Laszlo,Sergey | Runs | run entry - run100 - SCRAPER removed! | |
open file : run100
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
SIS intensity increased factor 2: 1.25e9, also Sergey tried to optimize these phase shift losses.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER OFF .--> papa Rutherford should come now
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 10:12, first file: run100_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 11:01
ON Rates
Si_X: 2 Hz
Si_Y: 2 Hz
Xray_35: 1 Hz
Xray_90: 70 Hz
Xray_145: 22 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.2 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 2.7e8
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 1e7 (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 4.6e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
236
|
Mon Mar 23 10:26:36 2020 |
Laszlo,Yury | Runs | run entry - run099 | |
open file : run099
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
SIS intensity increased factor 2: 1.25e9, also Sergey tried to optimize these phase shift losses.
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER in scraping poisition--> We expect to cut the Rutherford for now on.
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 10:12, first file: run099_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 10:25:59
ON Rates
Si_X: 2 Hz
Si_Y: 2 Hz
Xray_35: 1 Hz
Xray_90: 70 Hz
Xray_145: 22 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.17 uA with spikes for 3s long after injection roughly 10uA
SIS particles before: 2.7e8
ESR current at injection: 5.8e7?? (we see a bug: like the number of particles increases in the bunching phase)
ESR particles after decel.: 1e7 (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 5.4e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |
Attachment 1: 2020-03-23_10-39-59-234.png
|
|
Attachment 2: injection_current_spike.png
|
|
235
|
Mon Mar 23 10:08:12 2020 |
Laszlo,Yury | Runs | run entry - run098 | |
open file : run098
beam: 124Xe54+
energy: 10 MeV/u
SIS is back in business again!
purpose: data with TARGET ON and SCRAPER in scraping poisition--> We expect to cut the Rutherford for now on.
Detector position (Si): -27 mm
GE01DD1IG position (Scraper): 9 mm
run start at 10:12, first file: run098_0001.lmd
run stop at , last file: run_0xxx.lmd
_______________________________________________________________________________
time: 08:10
ON Rates
Si_X: 2 Hz
Si_Y: 2 Hz
Xray_35: 2 Hz
Xray_90: 57 Hz
Xray_145: 22 Hz
BaF_OR: ---
Si voltage: 60.02 V
Si leakage current: 4.17 uA
SIS particles before: 2.7e8
ESR current at injection: 5.3e7
ESR particles after decel.: 8e6 (it is hard to catch exactly)
Target ON density: 3.5e13
copy and repeat the above (below the line) every 30 minutes |