HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038
  nuclear two-photon decay  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry  Sun May 9 17:39:21 2021, Guy, Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 7th 19h vs 8th 21h 410MHz-05.09.19h-t11ms-sMontage.png410MHz-05.08.21h-t11ms-sMontage.png
    Reply  Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz Sum_245MHz_May10-1-2am_5_0-5_175s.png
       Reply  Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz 8x
          Reply  Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz 9x
             Reply  Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz 9x
Message ID: 108     Entry time: Sun May 9 17:39:21 2021     Reply to this: 127
Author: Guy 
Category: Analysis 
Subject: Comparison between 72Ge: 7th 19h vs 8th 21h 
Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.

Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
Attachment 2: Data from May 8th 21h-22h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175

The extra resolution gained on the 8th (and potentially other settings too) make the isomer visible where it wasn't present on the 7th.
Attachment 1: 410MHz-05.09.19h-t11ms-sMontage.png  240 kB  Uploaded Sun May 9 18:44:12 2021  | Hide | Hide all
410MHz-05.09.19h-t11ms-sMontage.png
Attachment 2: 410MHz-05.08.21h-t11ms-sMontage.png  251 kB  Uploaded Sun May 9 18:44:19 2021  | Hide | Hide all
410MHz-05.08.21h-t11ms-sMontage.png
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b