| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
134
|
Thu Jun 24 22:05:11 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Accelerator | LISE files for 72Ge, 70Se, 52Mn settings | This is just a Brho selection by the ESR based
on SIS-energy used,
energy-loss in target with calibrated thickness |
|
|
133
|
Mon May 10 08:49:01 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, RuiJiu | General | End of the measurement | The beam was stopped at about 08:40. |
|
|
132
|
Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz | Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.
|
9x |
|
131
|
Mon May 10 06:35:58 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, Shahab | Runs | going back to shot by shot recording with 410 detector | going back to shot by shot recording with
410 detector |
|
|
130
|
Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector.
Peak visible.
|
9x |
|
129
|
Mon May 10 06:16:31 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, Shahab | Runs | Recording broad band spectra with 410 | doing some broadband spectra recording with
the 410 MHz detector, for the purpose of
future confirmation of identification lines. |
|
|
128
|
Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
|
8x |
|
127
|
Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz | > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I
analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25
ms to see the evolution of the potential |
|
|
126
|
Mon May 10 03:37:53 2021 |
Chris C | Analysis | isomer? or wishful thinking? | They are not easy to find, but we do occasionally
see what might be the isomer. |
|
|
125
|
Mon May 10 01:34:37 2021 |
Chris C | General | Zoom screenshot | How things look currently in Zoom-world. |
|
|
124
|
Mon May 10 01:01:59 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, RuiJiu | General | Beam is back | The issue has been resolved and the beam is
back since 00:56. |
|
|
123
|
Mon May 10 00:51:38 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, RuiJiu | General | No beam in SIS | The beam was lost in SIS about 5 mins ago
due to the failure of HF cavities. Operators
are trying to solve the problem. |
|
|
122
|
Mon May 10 00:41:20 2021 |
Chris C | Accelerator | no beam | Beam gone ~0:34.
Working on getting it back.
Back in business ~0:57. |
|
|
121
|
Mon May 10 00:08:26 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | DAQ | Change reference level to -60dBm | Start a new run. The data of new run is in
:
SC_2021-05-10_00-08-08
|
|
|
120
|
Mon May 10 00:00:49 2021 |
Ragan, Rui-Jiu | DAQ | Change reference level to -70dBm | Start a new run. The data of new run is in
:
SC_2021-05-09_23-56-42
|
|
|
119
|
Sun May 9 23:59:26 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | DAQ | Start a new run. | Start a new run. The data of new run is in
:
reference level = -50dBm.
|
|
|
118
|
Sun May 9 23:32:24 2021 |
Helmut | Accelerator | parammodi saves | Here are parammodi saves for TE-line and ESR
for all four fragment settings:
For the first run of 72Ge (7.May) I do not |
8x |
|
117
|
Sun May 9 23:28:25 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, Wolfram, Helmut, Shahab | Runs | return with the Ge setting of the last night | starting filenames:
E143-410MHz-2021.05.09.23.28.24.018.tiq
|
|
|
116
|
Sun May 9 23:24:49 2021 |
Helmut, Wolfram, Yuri | Accelerator | scraper optmisation for 72Ge | We tried the scrapers a bit, because right
of peak some background appeared.
|
|
|
115
|
Sun May 9 22:31:23 2021 |
Helmut, Wolfram, Yuri | Accelerator | change to 72Ge | we change back to 72Ge
just change SIS-energy E = 441.0 MeV/u
beamline energy after target E = 392.9 MeV/u
|
|