This is just a Brho selection by the ESR based on SIS-energy used, 
energy-loss in target with calibrated thickness and momentum spread by the reaction (Goldhaber formula).
Production cross sections are by EPAX 3.1

The beam was stopped at about 08:40.

Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.


> Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector. Peak visible.
> 
> 
> > Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
> > Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
> > 
> > 
> > > > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.
> > > > 
> > > > Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > > > Attachment 2: Data from May 8th 21h-22h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > > > 
> > > > The extra resolution gained on the 8th (and potentially other settings too) make the isomer visible where it wasn't present on the 7th.
> > > 
> > > Hi, attached is the sum of all spectra from 1-2am on May 10th, on the 245 MHz detector. Takes me forever to download everything...
> > > I used the same parameters as Guy and Xiancheng: LFRAMES = 512 (in analyzer); -t 0.011 (= 11 ms) -s 5 ... 5.175 s.
> > > 
> > > Resolution looks good... :-)

going back to shot by shot recording with 410 detector

Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector. Peak visible.


> Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
> Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
> 
> 
> > > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.
> > > 
> > > Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > > Attachment 2: Data from May 8th 21h-22h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > > 
> > > The extra resolution gained on the 8th (and potentially other settings too) make the isomer visible where it wasn't present on the 7th.
> > 
> > Hi, attached is the sum of all spectra from 1-2am on May 10th, on the 245 MHz detector. Takes me forever to download everything...
> > I used the same parameters as Guy and Xiancheng: LFRAMES = 512 (in analyzer); -t 0.011 (= 11 ms) -s 5 ... 5.175 s.
> > 
> > Resolution looks good... :-)

doing some broadband spectra recording with the 410 MHz detector, for the purpose of future confirmation of identification lines.

Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.


> > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.
> > 
> > Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > Attachment 2: Data from May 8th 21h-22h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > 
> > The extra resolution gained on the 8th (and potentially other settings too) make the isomer visible where it wasn't present on the 7th.
> 
> Hi, attached is the sum of all spectra from 1-2am on May 10th, on the 245 MHz detector. Takes me forever to download everything...
> I used the same parameters as Guy and Xiancheng: LFRAMES = 512 (in analyzer); -t 0.011 (= 11 ms) -s 5 ... 5.175 s.
> 
> Resolution looks good... :-)

> Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.
> 
> Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> Attachment 2: Data from May 8th 21h-22h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> 
> The extra resolution gained on the 8th (and potentially other settings too) make the isomer visible where it wasn't present on the 7th.

Hi, attached is the sum of all spectra from 1-2am on May 10th, on the 245 MHz detector. Takes me forever to download everything...
I used the same parameters as Guy and Xiancheng: LFRAMES = 512 (in analyzer); -t 0.011 (= 11 ms) -s 5 ... 5.175 s.

Resolution looks good... :-)

They are not easy to find, but we do occasionally see what might be the isomer.

How things look currently in Zoom-world.

The issue has been resolved and the beam is back since 00:56.

The beam was lost in SIS about 5 mins ago due to the failure of HF cavities. Operators are trying to solve the problem.

Beam gone ~0:34.
Working on getting it back.
Back in business ~0:57.

Start a new run. The data of new run is in :
SC_2021-05-10_00-08-08
IQ_2021-05-10_00-08-08

Start a new run. The data of new run is in :
SC_2021-05-09_23-56-42
IQ_2021-05-09_23-56-42

Start a new run. The data of new run is in :
reference level = -50dBm.
SC_2021-05-09_23-43-37
IQ_2021-05-09_23-43-37

Here are parammodi saves for TE-line and ESR for all four fragment settings:
For the first run of 72Ge (7.May) I do not have files.

2021-05-09_11-22-51_SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1.txt:# Context: SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1 E143 52Mn
2021-05-09_11-23-12_ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1.txt:# Context: ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1 E143 52Mn
2021-05-09_15-46-52_ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1.txt:# Context: ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1 E143 52Mn-2
2021-05-09_15-47-16_SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1.txt:# Context: SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1 E143 52Mn-2
2021-05-09_19-43-28_ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1.txt:# Context: ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1 E143 70Se
2021-05-09_19-43-45_SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1.txt:# Context: SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1 E143 70Se
2021-05-09_22-23-23_ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1.txt:# Context: ESR_EXP21_06_ISO_78Kr_05May21.C1 E143 72Ge
2021-05-09_22-23-37_SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1.txt:# Context: SIS18_FAST_20210506_ESR_78KR32.C1 E143 72Ge

starting filenames:

E143-410MHz-2021.05.09.23.28.24.018.tiq

E143-245MHz-2021.05.09.22.28.12.904.tiq

We tried the scrapers a bit, because right of peak some background appeared.

The GE01DS_HI shows a strange effect,
normal -65mm gives good resolution, -30mm kills the beam, but even more in at -15 there is beam again.
We suppose the scraper is not massive but has an empty space behind it.
GE01DS_HA has no effect even at +0V.
Therefore, put I to -100mm and also use GE01DS3HG (from outside),set to -55mm.
Then also the straight section EEXDS2HA from + 8mm to +10mm (a bit more closed).

we change back to 72Ge
just change SIS-energy       E = 441.0 MeV/u
beamline energy after target E = 392.9 MeV/u
set ESR to A=72, Z=32 (72Ge)
--> good injection and resolution in ESR, at old frequencies