| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
112
|
Sun May 9 20:34:47 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | Comparison of frequency spectrum between 72Ge and other isotope | This some preliminary analysis results by
using NTCAP data. The IQ rate of NTCAP
is 20 MSamples/seconds. I analyzed data files |
6x |
|
126
|
Mon May 10 03:37:53 2021 |
Chris C | Analysis | isomer? or wishful thinking? | They are not easy to find, but we do occasionally
see what might be the isomer. |
|
|
127
|
Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz | > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I
analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25
ms to see the evolution of the potential |
|
|
128
|
Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
|
8x |
|
130
|
Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector.
Peak visible.
|
9x |
|
132
|
Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz | Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.
|
9x |
|
135
|
Fri Jun 25 21:47:24 2021 |
Yuri | Analysis | Identification | Attached are two files with a proposed particle
identification.
Different colors indicate different harmonic |
|
|
143
|
Wed Jun 30 00:12:55 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | the ID of 72Ge setting | |
|
|
144
|
Wed Jun 30 00:20:10 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | ID of 70Se setting on May | This is an old spectrum which was recoded
on May. |
|
|
149
|
Wed Jun 30 12:26:58 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | NTCAP start. | SC_2021-06-30_11-00-12
IQ_2021-06-30_11-00-12
reference level -80dBm.
|
|
|
150
|
Wed Jun 30 12:35:53 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | Change reference level to -20dBm. Turn of amplifier. | SC_2021-06-30_12_35_52
IQ_2021-06-30_12_35_43
Reference level=-20dBm |
|
|
152
|
Wed Jun 30 13:05:08 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | ID of 70Se | This is the latest ID of 70Se setting. |
|
|
157
|
Wed Jun 30 19:08:25 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | ID of 70Se spectrum recorded in May | |
|
|
162
|
Wed Jun 30 23:29:42 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | Start a new run. | reference level=-20 dBm.
p:\E143\sc\SC_2021-6-30_23_27_45
p:\E143\iq\IQ_2021-6-30_23_27_34 |
|
|
189
|
Fri Jul 2 01:31:35 2021 |
The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy) | Analysis | First spectra after bottle change | The first good spectra after the gas bottle
change is from 23:38:25 (on the 410 MHz Analyzer)
|
|
|
190
|
Fri Jul 2 01:34:03 2021 |
The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy) | Analysis | Summary of spectra 22:00-23:00 | The last hour before the gas bottle change
is summarized here.
The first pic shows the 410 MHz spectra taken |
|
|
193
|
Fri Jul 2 02:03:36 2021 |
The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy) | Analysis | Summary of spectra 0:00-1:00 | Same as before, for 0-1h on July 2nd
|
|
|
196
|
Fri Jul 2 04:27:38 2021 |
The remote Canadian beavers (Iris and Guy) | Analysis | Summary of spectra 0:00-4:00 (410 MHz) | Same as before for 0-4h on July 2nd.
> Same as before, for 0-1h on July 2nd
|
|
|
198
|
Fri Jul 2 05:08:16 2021 |
Guy Leckenby (Canadian beaver team) | Analysis | e143_analyser.py Summing Script | I've written two scripts that others might
find useful for the on-line analysis.
1. The first is a simple bash script that |
|
|
199
|
Fri Jul 2 06:33:48 2021 |
The remote Canadian beavers (Iris and Guy) | Analysis | Summary of spectra 4:00-6:00 (410 MHz) | Same as before for 4-5h and 5-6h.
No isomer, I think :-( (Sorry, Wolfram!)
|
|