HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038 E0075 E0203_E0018 E0052_2025
  Nuclear hyperfine mixing in 229Th89+ 2025, Page 3 of 4  Not logged in ELOG logo
IDdown Date Author Category Subject
  34   Sat Jun 21 02:32:24 2025 Alex, Anton, Rodolfo, Hiroshi, CarstenLaserLaser scanning setting
This is the initial scanning range
  • 3 Loops
  • 501 Steps
  • 15 Shots / Step
  • From 550.4 nm to 547.9 nm. In total 2.5 nm @ 0.005 nm

Test file on DAQ2 is 0132.lmd / 0133.lmd
  33   Sat Jun 21 01:40:31 2025 Carsten, Alex, Anton, Rodolfo, HiroshiAcceleratorbeam parameters
The revolution frequency for the measurement condition is: 1.542728 MHz.
The electron cooler voltage is: 104411 V.
  32   Sat Jun 21 00:52:07 2025 CarstenAcceleratorSummary of the last days (bunches wiht several isotopes still in ) / frequency of the
Initially, we has very low SIS beam intensities in the 1e8 region. Setting up ESR wiht Stacking etc. turned out to be extremly tedious for the ESR crew.
Yet, they managed to get stochastic ooling working early on.

Accumulation with the new "stochstic cooling only" scheme essentially does not saturate even after 40 injections or so.
One problem was that the beam often got lost at deceleration and not reliable / reproducable conditions could be achieved.

Also the secondary beam and partilce ID could finally be established (see earlier posts). During deceleration often the partilces were got lost again.

In the decelerated bunch at least 7 isotopes were decelerated (and not only one):

The frequencies were

@ 400 MeV/u in SC 3:
    [1] 242.27986 MHz
    [2] 242.82623 MHz + 27.5 kHz
    [3] 242.853 MHz + 54.375 kHz 229Th
    [4] 242.878 MHz + 79.375 kHz
    [5] 242.936 MHz + 137.5 kHz
    [6] 242.959 MHz + 160 kHz
    [7] 242.982 MHz + 183.75 kHz

decelerated to 190 MeV/u:
    [1] 243.6925 MHz
    [2] 243.72213 MHz + 29.6 kHz
    [3] 243.750 MHz + 57.375 kHz 229Th --- Reference on Schottky scope
    [4] 243.7768 MHz + 84. kHz
    [5] 243.8376 MHz + 145 kHz
    [6] 243.863 MHz + 170.6 kHz
    [7] 243.687 MHz + 194.625 kHz

Thursday night (19.6. -> 20.06.) a first scraping was established.


In order to cleanly scrape the peaks Sergey Litvinov devised a new pattern:

At the low energy (190 MeV/u) the bunch is unpacked, cooled, scraped and rebunched for the measurement.

Some details of th eabove can be found in the acclerator log.

The problem with the beam losses were solved with large cooling phases at the end of the accumulation cycle.
  31   Sat Jun 21 00:23:22 2025 RodolfoLaserDye
I have prepared new (fresh) dye solutions of Fluorescein 27: 2 charges. They are in the Safety Cabinet (Sicherheitsschrank) in the ESR Laser lab
  30   Fri Jun 20 15:58:21 2025 Wilfried, Konstantin, SimonLaserLaser stepwidth
From previous Bi-Beamtimes, we expect the width of the transition to be >50GHz (FWHM). The current step width is 0.002nm which corresponds to 8GHz, so the laser would be in resonance for 6 steps.
We should aim for at least 5 steps in resonance.

line width (sigma) >20GHz
FWHM ~50GHz
step width (fundamental) 0.004nm (4GHz)
step width (doubled) 0.002nm (8GHz)
  29   Fri Jun 20 11:25:32 2025 Julien, Kristian, KonstantinLaserAutomated laser scans
In contrast to entry E12, the cabling for the automated start of the laser scan is now connected to IO3 of sddsc221.
  28   Fri Jun 20 06:37:51 2025 KonstantinAcceleratorPosition of contaminants
I checked the positions of the contaminants. Therefore, I drove the scrapers and observed the signal at the Schottky detector

While the vertical positions are identical for all scrapers, the horizontal positions deviate due to the dispersion in the cooler section

Scraper -83.75kHz -26.875 0 61kHz 83.25 110.625
GECEDS1VU -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
GECEDS1HA (from 75mm) -4 -5 -5.2 -6.6 -6.9 -7.2
GECEDS1HA (from -75mm) -11.8 -12.8 -13.3 -14.5 -15.1 -15.7
GECEDS2VU 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
  27   Wed Jun 18 20:24:01 2025 Carsten, Shahab, Ragandeep, Danyal et al. (the dayshift) and ESR crewAccelerator229Th89+ identification
We believe to have identified the 237U92+ and the 229Th89+ peaks. 

Using the Schottky resonator at about 244 MHz and taking the 123rd harmonic: 
The Schottky peak of 237U92+ should be at 242.7975 MHz and the one of 229Th89+ at 242.8494 MHz. 
The peaks should be ~52 kHz apart.

We have used:  
gamma_t	= 2.355 
alpha_p = 0.18 
  26   Wed Jun 18 19:05:28 2025 Carlo, Zac, Shahab, RaganAnalysisPID with rionid
For PID with rionid we used: 
- LISE file from last year (attached.
- .npz file from 410 RSA (attached).
  25   Wed Jun 18 14:01:40 2025 Julien, Konstantin, Stefan, Rima Ion bunch on PMTs
Apparentlty did not work yesterday evening (no signal), but looks fine now (see attachment)
  24   Wed Jun 18 11:44:15 2025 Julien, Konstantin, Stefan, Rima Jitter CFD
Pulses on photodiodes in entry 20 

1. seem wide, so we also looked at qswitch signal; also seemes wide.
2. Have a tail

1.:

We investigated this and came to the conclusion, that the CFD is the issue:
- On an oscilloscope, when looking at both HF signal (CFD input) and CFD output, there is a 2ns jitter.
- The same jitter is visible when looking at the CFD output when triggering on a freq. generator signal with same frequency and amplitude as HF signal (1.54263 MHz; 1V peak to peak).
- There is not significant jitter when comparing the CFD output and the qswitch signal

We tried differents CFD (also a leading edge CFD / different thresholds), but this did not significantly improve what we saw on the oscilloscope.
Applying a 10MHz filter to the HF signal only made the jitter worse.
There might be an option to get a logic (NIM) signal from ESR instead of the sin-signal
Alternatively, one could think about using a PLL.
Note: the 2ns might also be limited by the trigger of the oscilloscope. We saw that if the trigger of the oscilloscope is not on the steepest part of the HF signal, the jitter "gets worse".

2.:

We saw on the qswtich signal, that there are instances, when  the q-switch signal is too early; 
Ww will try to find out which NIM module between the CFD and the final qswitch signal causes this
Preliminary: It's coincidance crate
  23   Wed Jun 18 08:07:17 2025 Julien, KonstantinLasernew FCU Calibration
UV power was not stable but dropping from ~18 mW to 13 mW after opening COBRA shutters.
New calibration of frequency conversion unit:

Wavelength/nm       Position/Steps
554,0001            383029
553,0000            386604
552,0001            390229
551,0000            393954
550,0001            397679
549,0001            401404
548,0001            405104
547,0001            408829

now stable at ~19-20 mJ depending on wavelength

Table of dataset: Attachement 1
Plot of dataset: Attachement 2
  22   Wed Jun 18 07:59:00 2025 Julien, KonstantinLaserPhase-offset
We recognized that the output power of the pump laser was instable when externally triggered with 200kHz (stand-bye frequency of ESR). Therefore, we changed the coarse timing offset of the pockels cell trigger compared to the flash lamp pulse from 215µs to 219.9µs. 
Thereby, the output power increased from ~600mJ to 620mJ, and the PTP stability improved from 15% to 10%. The RMS stability improved from 2% to 1.2 %. With these settings we had UV pulse energies of 20mJ.
  21   Wed Jun 18 03:12:25 2025 RodolfoLaserBeam Stabilization
The laser beam pointing has changed, even thought the MRC settings are the same as given in Entry 5 (this elog). This could be caused by a droping of the laser output energy which is now 13,8 mJ @275 nm
  20   Wed Jun 18 01:58:02 2025 Esther, Alexis, Anton, Rodolfo, CarstenAcceleratorNo Bunched Beam
The Bunching is not set properly. We do not see the ion bunch with the Photomultiplier.
  19   Wed Jun 18 00:56:28 2025 Carsten, Rodolfo, Anton, Alexis, Esther beam overlap with t-scrapers
When testing the overlap between laser and ion beam we observed the following positions:

motorion beam position (mm) from outsideion beam position (mm) from inside
GECEDS1VU 0 6.5
GECEDS1HA -22.5 -13.5
GECEDS2VU 1 8.5
GECEDS2HA -20.5 -10


Note: To move GECEDS1VU the corresponding horizontal drive (GECEDS1HA) has to be at 2 mm.
  18   Wed Jun 18 00:33:56 2025 Esther, Alexis, Anton, Rodolfo, CarstenDAQR4l-41
We have some issues with the RIO computer R4l-41 (DAQ1). We had to switch off completely twice. Only then it reacted properly. Maybe a problem with the network at about 00:00 o'clock?
  17   Tue Jun 17 19:25:30 2025 RodolfoAcceleratorT-Scrapers in E-Cooler
Here are the instructions to drive the T-Scrapers inside the ESR Electron Cooler

  • ECEDS1VU: Verriegelt mit ECEDS1HA. Der Antrieb kann nur fahren
    wenn der Antrieb ECEDS1HA in Position -4,0 steht.

  • ECEDS1HA: Verriegelt mit ECEDS1VU. Der Antrieb kann nur fahren
    wenn der Antrieb ECEDS1VU in Stellung EI steht.

  • ECEDS2VU: Verriegelt mit ECEDS2HA. Der Antrieb kann nur fahren
    wenn der Antrieb ECEDS2HA in Position 0,0 steht.

  • ECEDS2HA: Verriegelt mit ECEDS2VU. Der Antrieb kann nur fahren
    wenn der Antrieb ECEDS2VU in Stellung EI steht.

According to Boywitt/Schuhmacher, BEA-MEI. Date: 28.07.2021
  16   Tue Jun 17 16:33:16 2025 Carsten, SimonDAQGate Q-swtich
The gate generator of the Q-switch signal for the Vuprom TDC was set to 10ms.
  14   Mon Jun 16 22:27:01 2025 Carsten, SimonDAQThresholds
We also adjusted the thresholds for the mesytic.
Doing that, we noticed that one of the trafos is broken (5th row, middle).

PMT channel Threshold
South 5 35
Middle 6 16
North 7 16
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b