| 
HOME
ESR
EXPERIMENTS
LABS etc
 | 
| 
E121
E127
E132
E125
E143
laser_cooling_2021
E142
Ê128
E146
E0052
E0018
E0028
E0038
E0075
E0203_E0018
E0052_2025
 | 
|   nuclear two-photon decay  | 
Not logged in | 
  | 
   | 
   Sun May  9 17:39:21 2021, Guy, Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 7th 19h vs 8th 21h   
 |     
   Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz  
 |        
   Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz 8x 
 |           
   Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz 9x 
 |              
   Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz 9x 
 |   
 | 
| 
Message ID: 132
    Entry time: Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021
    In reply to: 130
 |  
| Author: | 
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.)  | 
 | Category: | 
Analysis  | 
 | Subject: | 
Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz  | 
 
  |  
 
 | 
Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.
> Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector. Peak visible.
> 
> 
> > Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
> > Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
> > 
> > 
> > > > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.
> > > > 
> > > > Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > > > Attachment 2: Data from May 8th 21h-22h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
> > > > 
> > > > The extra resolution gained on the 8th (and potentially other settings too) make the isomer visible where it wasn't present on the 7th.
> > > 
> > > Hi, attached is the sum of all spectra from 1-2am on May 10th, on the 245 MHz detector. Takes me forever to download everything...
> > > I used the same parameters as Guy and Xiancheng: LFRAMES = 512 (in analyzer); -t 0.011 (= 11 ms) -s 5 ... 5.175 s.
> > > 
> > > Resolution looks good... :-)  | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 | 
 |