Sun May 9 20:34:47 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, Comparison of frequency spectrum between 72Ge and other isotope 6x
|
This some preliminary analysis results by using NTCAP data. The IQ rate of NTCAP is 20 MSamples/seconds. I analyzed data files recorded from May 7
17:39 to May 8 2:20. The frequency of 72Ge is bended by 4kHz at the beginning of some injections. In order to check whether this frequency bending is
|
Mon May 10 03:37:53 2021, Chris C, Analysis, isomer? or wishful thinking?
|
They are not easy to find, but we do occasionally see what might be the isomer. |
Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz
|
> Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see the evolution of the potential isomer across the injection.
>
> Attachment 1: Data from May 7th 19h-20h. -t 11ms progression from -s=5 to -s=5.175
|
Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz 8x
|
Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
|
Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz 9x
|
Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector. Peak visible.
|
Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021, Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.), Analysis, Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz 9x
|
Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.
|
Fri Jun 25 21:47:24 2021, Yuri, Analysis, Identification
|
Attached are two files with a proposed particle identification.
Different colors indicate different harmonic numbers |
Wed Jun 30 00:12:55 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, the ID of 72Ge setting
|
|
Wed Jun 30 00:20:10 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, ID of 70Se setting on May
|
This is an old spectrum which was recoded on May. |
Wed Jun 30 12:26:58 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, NTCAP start.
|
SC_2021-06-30_11-00-12
IQ_2021-06-30_11-00-12
reference level -80dBm.
|
Wed Jun 30 12:35:53 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, Change reference level to -20dBm. Turn of amplifier.
|
SC_2021-06-30_12_35_52
IQ_2021-06-30_12_35_43
Reference level=-20dBm |
Wed Jun 30 13:05:08 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, ID of 70Se
|
This is the latest ID of 70Se setting. |
Wed Jun 30 19:08:25 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, ID of 70Se spectrum recorded in May
|
|
Wed Jun 30 23:29:42 2021, Rui-Jiu Chen, Analysis, Start a new run.
|
reference level=-20 dBm.
p:\E143\sc\SC_2021-6-30_23_27_45
p:\E143\iq\IQ_2021-6-30_23_27_34 |
Fri Jul 2 01:31:35 2021, The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy), Analysis, First spectra after bottle change
|
The first good spectra after the gas bottle change is from 23:38:25 (on the 410 MHz Analyzer) |
Fri Jul 2 01:34:03 2021, The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy), Analysis, Summary of spectra 22:00-23:00
|
The last hour before the gas bottle change is summarized here.
The first pic shows the 410 MHz spectra taken from 22-23h on the 410 MHz analyzer, in time slices of 0.1 sec from 0s-2s.
The second pic shows the spectra in 20ms slices from 1s-1.16s.
|
Fri Jul 2 02:03:36 2021, The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy), Analysis, Summary of spectra 0:00-1:00
|
Same as before, for 0-1h on July 2nd
|
Fri Jul 2 04:27:38 2021, The remote Canadian beavers (Iris and Guy), Analysis, Summary of spectra 0:00-4:00 (410 MHz)
|
Same as before for 0-4h on July 2nd.
> Same as before, for 0-1h on July 2nd
|
Fri Jul 2 05:08:16 2021, Guy Leckenby (Canadian beaver team), Analysis, e143_analyser.py Summing Script
|
I've written two scripts that others might find useful for the on-line analysis.
1. The first is a simple bash script that runs a for loop to run the e143_analyzer.py script for a sequence of start values (-s). You'll need to change
the increment and
|
Fri Jul 2 06:33:48 2021, The remote Canadian beavers (Iris and Guy), Analysis, Summary of spectra 4:00-6:00 (410 MHz)
|
Same as before for 4-5h and 5-6h.
No isomer, I think :-( (Sorry, Wolfram!)
|