| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
|
111
|
Tue May 21 03:07:58 2024 |
K.Takiura Y.Kikuchi | Runs | No beam | 03:07 Beam is down. |
|
112
|
Tue May 21 03:27:21 2024 |
K.Takiura Y.Kikuchi | Runs | Beam back | 03:26 Beam is back. |
|
29
|
Wed May 15 17:22:43 2024 |
Jeroen, Shahab, Johan | Runs | 98Mo run | Beam tuned at 4:50, data acquisition aligned for 98Mo at 4:56. |
|
31
|
Wed May 15 17:47:34 2024 |
Jeroen, Johan, Shahab | General | New Trigger Setup | We changed the trigger setup, see attachment |
|
32
|
Wed May 15 18:37:36 2024 |
Jeroen, Johan, Shahab | Runs | Beam returned to ESR | Beam returned at 18:30:55. Taking data with new triggers. |
|
28
|
Wed May 15 16:55:10 2024 |
Jeroen, Johan | General | Tuning ESR scraper. Isomer resolved. | 4:50 Scraper tuned to produce Gaussian beam profile for 98Mo. Isomer now clearly resolved.
Plan to take data for 98Mo fragment for 12 hours. Measurements from 4:59 are now aligned so that the Molybdenum fragment is centered in the RSA acquisition. |
|
30
|
Wed May 15 17:45:09 2024 |
Jeroen, Johan | General | No beam to ESR | Beam lost from SIS18 at 17:41:41. |
|
36
|
Wed May 15 20:40:51 2024 |
Jeroen, Johan | Runs | Beam returned to ESR | 20:39:42 Runs restarted. |
|
35
|
Wed May 15 20:17:20 2024 |
Jeroen | Accelerator | Fewer spills from SIS18 then lost beam | Apparently fewer spills coming from SIS18, see attached.
Beam was lost at 20:17:52. |
|
108
|
Mon May 20 13:26:55 2024 |
Jelena, Oliver, Shahab | General | Plunger values | plunger 150 for 250
plunger 48 for 410 |
|
109
|
Mon May 20 13:31:09 2024 |
Jelena, Oliver, Shahab | General | New setting focussing on 96-Sr | plunger 150 for 250
plunger 48 for 410
From file starting from 13:21 is a new setting for 96Sr. |
|
110
|
Mon May 20 14:02:03 2024 |
Jelena, Oliver, Shahab | DAQ | Retune 245 MHz | Mew numbers for 245 MHz plunger is 190 (both) |
|
74
|
Fri May 17 19:43:03 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P., Shahab, David | Analysis | + Beam issues | Important - analysis
-> we are trying to get PID with a new setting to see if 98Zr decays with 30s half-life
--> we are taking 1 min cycles
---> strongest line does not corespondents to 96Sr38+ as it decays very fast (few seconds) and we observe long-lived one - still we have to confirm this
----> analysis is still ongoing
We lost the beam at 19:35
|
|
73
|
Fri May 17 17:50:49 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P., Shahab | DAQ | new trigger events | From 17:49 we have super short trigger. - see attached setting! |
|
68
|
Fri May 17 16:34:43 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | General | Beam issues | We lost beam at 16:29.
Cooler has to be investigated. |
|
69
|
Fri May 17 16:42:00 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | General | Beam back | Beam is back at 16:38.
We are changing the setting. |
|
71
|
Fri May 17 17:08:24 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | Runs | New setting from 5p.m. | NEW SETTING
All runs from 17:00 are with new setting, due to changing the directory - transfer from old to new one around 200 runs. |
|
75
|
Fri May 17 20:33:43 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | General | Beam returned to FRS | We have again beam at FRS..
But we are taking still cycles on a same way as before...and discussing to go back to the old zirconium setting
In one hour HHT will enter the cave. |
|
76
|
Fri May 17 21:44:39 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | General | Beam issues | We do not have beam, and we have some instability during last 1-1.5 hour. |
|
77
|
Fri May 17 21:56:58 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | Accelerator | Optimizing setting | We are optimizing setting for 96Sr
start time: 21:52 |
|