| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
|
78
|
Fri May 17 22:06:05 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | Accelerator | ESR |
ESR is down |
|
Draft
|
Fri May 17 22:38:30 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | | ESR + e.cooler are back |
We have back ESR and fixed issue with a cooler. |
|
80
|
Fri May 17 22:43:11 2024 |
Jelena B, Zsolt P. | Accelerator | ESR_e.cooler are back |
We have back ESR and we have a fixed issue with a cooler.
Beam issues! |
|
81
|
Fri May 17 22:48:14 2024 |
Jelena B | Accelerator | Back to old setting |
We go back to the Zr-settings to make a deffinite state of ESR and we move again to previous setting (Sr) |
|
1
|
Tue Apr 16 15:35:07 2024 |
Jan | Collaboration | G-PAC Proposal |
|
|
60
|
Thu May 16 19:10:27 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard, Xinliang, David, Shahab | Runs | New Run setting for Zr Isomer hunt |
19:10 runs from now on run with an optimized setting:
we did a lot of optimization for the hunt of Zr isomer:
1- increased the time as much as possible, but stay within the 1:1 cycle with FRS
2- increased the sampling rate from 6.25 MSPS to 50 MSPS (!) going down to very short recording times --> 300ms only
We are now taking data with this settings for about half an hour. |
|
52
|
Thu May 16 15:24:30 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Accelerator | new Plunger setting |
plunger motors were set
to +/-390 mm for 245 MHz resonator
and +/-55 mm for 410 MHz resonator |
|
53
|
Thu May 16 16:10:03 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Lassie Screenshot |
Lassie Screenshot taken at 16:09 |
|
54
|
Thu May 16 16:38:11 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | No beam to ESR |
because of problems in HHT
no beam from 16:36 |
|
56
|
Thu May 16 16:45:33 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Beam returned to ESR |
beam is back
16:45 |
|
57
|
Thu May 16 18:28:31 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | No beam to ESR |
beam issues between 18:23-18:26
and beam completely lost from 18:27 till 18:32
in the SIS an issue with a dipole occured |
|
58
|
Thu May 16 18:33:30 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Beam returned to ESR |
Beam is back at 18:32
now in the particle plot the peaks seem to be more isolated than before (see attachment 1)
since 18:36 it looks like before (see attachment 2) |
|
59
|
Thu May 16 18:55:38 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | General | new timing cycle |
new timing cycle of 6.7s |
|
61
|
Thu May 16 21:13:18 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Intensity drop |
The intensity dropped at 21:10 from ~ 1.6E9 down to ~ 8E8 |
|
62
|
Thu May 16 21:26:50 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Intensity back to previous values |
since 21:20 the intensity is back to 1.5E9 |
|
63
|
Thu May 16 21:40:20 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Intensity drop |
Intensity in particles dropped from 21:33 |
|
64
|
Thu May 16 21:51:22 2024 |
Ide, Hubbard | Runs | Intensity back to previous values |
since 21:48 particle intensities increased to again to 1.5E9 |
|
Draft
|
Fri May 17 17:03:39 2024 |
Helmut, Yury | Accelerator | approx. 96Sr setting |
Only 96Sr would yield very few line with only ions from tiem to time.
So we went a bit lower in Brho 7.69 Tm -> 7.65 Tm.
The setting is calculated as a 98Mo39+.
E-SIS = 455.3 MeV/ for 100Mo.
after target 98Mo now with 39+ gives 7.6500 Tm.
In ESR also 39+.
In LISE we get the same average gamma as before for 98Zr (gamma = 1.40082). |
|
72
|
Fri May 17 17:09:26 2024 |
Helmut, Yury | Accelerator | approx. 96Sr setting (98Zr39+) |
Only 96Sr would yield very few line with only ions from time to time.
So we went a bit lower in Brho 7.69 Tm -> 7.65 Tm.
The setting is calculated as a 98Mo39+.
E-SIS = 455.3 MeV/ for 100Mo,
after target 98Mo now with 39+ gives 7.6500 Tm.
In ESR also 39+.
In LISE we get the same average gamma as before for 98Zr (gamma = 1.40082).
The 98Zr was also entered as a 98Mo40+- |
|
98
|
Sat May 18 16:45:15 2024 |
Helmut, Yury | Accelerator | setting for 96Sr (98Y) |
To have a few more lines the setting actually is not on 96Sr directly, but on 98Y39+.
98Y is also the one set to be isochronous.
But in addition the SIS-energy is shifted by -0.9 MeV/u to get at least better transmission for 96Sr. |