| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Year |
Text |
 |
|
241
|
Mon Mar 23 12:30:39 2020 |
laszlo | Analysis | with and without scraper | | |
|
|
494
|
Thu May 27 12:41:25 2021 |
Yuri, Jan | Runs | Run 0152 | 2021 | No. of stacks: 10
length SC10: 2x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
|
495
|
Thu May 27 13:24:29 2021 |
Yuri, Jan | Runs | Run 0153 | 2021 | All runs before (since 13:40 26/05/21) were
taken without the degrader in FRS!
|
|
|
499
|
Thu May 27 14:38:14 2021 |
Yuri, Jan | Runs | Run 0155 | 2021 |
No. of stacks: 10
length SC10: 2x 5.5s
|
|
|
493
|
Thu May 27 11:36:23 2021 |
Yuri, Beatriz, Jan | Runs | Run 0151 | 2021 | Power supplies for correction coils were in
failure.
No effect seen in schottky after reset and |
|
|
489
|
Thu May 27 08:23:05 2021 |
Yuri, Beatriz | Runs | Run 0148 | 2021 | No. of stacks: 20
length SC10: 3x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
|
490
|
Thu May 27 08:26:15 2021 |
Yuri, Beatriz | General | Optimisation beam position on target and scraper position | 2021 | Optimised overlap with the target by shifting
the beam from -11.5 to 12.8 mm. This lead
to an increase of the DSSSD rate of a factor |
|
|
491
|
Thu May 27 09:39:15 2021 |
Yuri, Beatriz | Runs | Run 0149 | 2021 | No. of stacks: 20
length SC10: 3x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
|
492
|
Thu May 27 10:21:41 2021 |
Yuri, Beatriz | Runs | Run 0150 | 2021 | No. of stacks: 10
length SC10: 2x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
|
353
|
Wed May 19 19:47:14 2021 |
Yuri | General | Beam Halflife at 30 AMeV | 2021 | |
|
|
16
|
Mon Jul 8 14:57:07 2019 |
Yuanming Xing | Detectors | The measurement of the tilting angle | | As shown in the figure, the detector is tilted
by a certain angle which is about 45 degree.
|
|
|
17
|
Tue Jul 9 15:26:59 2019 |
Yuanming Xing | Simulations | Simulated Rutherford scattering distribution on detector | | Simulated Rutherford scattering distribution
on detector
|
|
|
543
|
Sat May 29 13:43:39 2021 |
Tino, Rene, Yuri, Laszlo, Markus | Runs | change of settings | 2021 | from now on, everal beam setting will be different.
We could not get the beam back to were it
was before. When the scraper was pulled back |
|
|
98
|
Sat Mar 21 03:01:22 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run051 | | Open file: runstart051
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
|
99
|
Sat Mar 21 03:03:53 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run052 | | Open file: runstart052
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
|
100
|
Sat Mar 21 03:30:21 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run052 | | Open file: runstart052
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
|
101
|
Sat Mar 21 03:58:56 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run053 | | Open file: runstart053
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
|
102
|
Sat Mar 21 04:29:59 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run053 | | Open file: runstart053
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
|
103
|
Sat Mar 21 05:01:09 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run054 | | Open file: runstart054
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
|
104
|
Sat Mar 21 05:29:17 2020 |
Tino, Oliver | Runs | run entry - run054 | | Open file: runstart054
beam: 118Te52+
|
|