HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038
  proton-capture on 118Te, Page 17 of 29  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Categorydown Subject Year
  106   Sat Mar 21 06:02:22 2020 Tino, OliverGeneralDetector filling 
Run stopped for detector fillings
  115   Sat Mar 21 10:20:27 2020 Ragan, AlexGeneralTarget LN2 
The LN2 Dewar on the ESR roof has been refilled.
  119   Sat Mar 21 11:30:04 2020 LaszloGeneralMWPC movement 
now we try to move the capture detector (MWPC in the 1. dipol before our Si setup) inside the ring while the DAQ was ON

we tried to move it as close as possible to the beam

On the picture below you can see that we had some increased current while moving the MWPC --> scattering from the beam while scraping it
  122   Sat Mar 21 12:02:57 2020 Ragan, LaszloGeneralrun entry - run061 
12:02 pm - scapper is taken out completely 
open file : runstart061
  123   Sat Mar 21 12:06:50 2020 LaszloGeneralrun61 - SCRAPER moved out 
we want to see any change on the Silicon count rate, because we will have now also Rutherford scattering. 
  125   Sat Mar 21 12:32:00 2020 LaszloGeneralEstimated target thickness 
Target thickness must be like 5mm (was measured with a moving thin wire)
The beam thickness is small because of the low intensity
Maybe we hit the target a bit offset --> less rate?

We might have the option to increase the target 1magnitude more, but this might not help because we can kill the beam 
with this.

I have the impression we just simply have less number of stored ions like 10^4 or evem less...

Yury: "we are unsure about the settings and desperately seek for any means of additional diagnostics"
  126   Sat Mar 21 12:42:21 2020 RaganGeneralEntry to ESR for MCP detector 
Pierre Michel and Laszlo go inside the ESR for switching on the MCP detector so that the photons from the gas jet and secondary beam interaction can be seen.

Close file: run061
  130   Sat Mar 21 14:52:05 2020 LaszloGeneraltarget optimization 
previous position of the beam at target was -3mm (for the night position)
max. intensity position of the beam at target 1s -1mm. --> now it is set to this position

now Ulli also increasing the density of the jet. Right now Ulli is warming the noozle. --> takes 1hour roughly.
Earlier: 1.4E13
Now: 
  133   Sat Mar 21 15:26:49 2020 LaszloGeneralSCRAPER is ON use again 
Yuri puts back the scraper (Egelhof 1 - GE01DD1IG) into position = +19. (where it was in the evening)
  134   Sat Mar 21 15:30:34 2020 SergiyGeneralgo into the ESR 
We are going into the ESR to check the electronics.
Use calibration sources (133Ba etc).
  135   Sat Mar 21 17:21:57 2020 LaszloGeneralnew Target density 
Ulli and Nikos managed to set the target density to ~7E13  at 51K temperature

The cycle is checked again, it seems fine.
  138   Sat Mar 21 17:34:10 2020 SergiyGeneralRecoils 
We started recording the data from the recoils using the MCP from Pierre-Michael's experiment. 
17:30 File opened: recoils1662.lmd.
data is stored at lxg1299: data.local2/hillenbrand/Laszlo
  140   Sat Mar 21 18:13:22 2020 ShahabGeneralrough comparison gas target off and on 
rough comparison of life time at 10 MeV/u when target off with on. more noise in background means weaker signal.
  151   Sat Mar 21 23:07:00 2020 LaszloGeneral1672. MCP file was (recoils) was not closed 
1672. MCP file was  (recoils) was not closed when we refilled the Xrays and did the cable change of 90 and 145 xrays
These stored in lxg1299 local disk
  177   Sun Mar 22 10:05:37 2020 Esther, RaganGeneralrun entry - run079 
The intensity of beam from SIS is less due to some issues with UNILAc.
  179   Sun Mar 22 10:28:27 2020 Esther, RaganGeneralrun entry - run079 
The problem at UNILAC seems to have solved itself. Intensity is returning to normal.
  183   Sun Mar 22 12:01:44 2020 Esther, RaganGeneralVacuum problem with SIS 
There is some problem with the vacuum in SIS and thus data recording is stopped.
  186   Sun Mar 22 12:53:43 2020 LaszloGeneralquick summary for the 118Te overnight measurement 
Quoting Yury:
"The count rate is very low. We estimate that we store about 10^4 118Te particles at 10 AMeV. This is a very low number.
On Saturday we re-implemented the recoil setup (MCP from Pierre-Michelle) from the previous experiment and could verify the overlap between the stored beam and the gas-jet.
In the evening the intensity has been optimized and we are running presently with stable 1.5-2 10^9 particles extracted from the SIS. Indeed, another factor 2-3 would be great.
We had to work on the gas-jet target density which significantly dropped."
Yesterday evening we started with gas jet-denisity  of ~7E13 which dropped during night to ~2E13. 

We have overall on the targetON Si position histo 57 counts. Form these I estimated based on the 124Xe measurement like very roughly 21% Rutherford, 63% pn, and 6% pg counts. For the number of pg this would mean 3.4counts, I can see now like 2 (bin (6,6) and bin (6,7))

To only good news that the scraper seems to work, althought the 2 bins at (6,12) and (6,15) I don't understand now.

Also we can see some tiny peaks in the Xray spectra. The tininess can be explained due to the low number of ions in the ESR.
  188   Sun Mar 22 13:33:19 2020 LaszloGeneral2nd storage of MCP data 
I made a backup for the MCP data on my own GSI laptop. Looking for better solution...
the original "fresh" files stored at litv-exp@lxg1299:/data.local2/hillenbrand/Laszlo/
  191   Sun Mar 22 14:58:59 2020 LaszloGeneraldropping density of Gasjet 
after like 20min run, the density of the gasjet already dropped from 10^14 to 8.7*10^13. Now it seems to remain in that value

Below in arbitrary units one can see the trend of the gas jet density starting from 10^14 to 8.7*10^13
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b