ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
179
|
Thu Jul 1 20:35:21 2021 |
Andrew Nic Shahab | DAQ | Acquisition stopped |
Checking if signal can be further amplified
Last files:
245MHz 2021.07.01.20.36.11.218
410MHz 2021.07.01.20.35.46.847 |
180
|
Thu Jul 1 20:48:58 2021 |
Shahab Andrew Nic | DAQ | Acquisition started |
15dB amplifier on 410MHz |
36
|
Fri May 7 08:04:22 2021 |
Carlo Bruno, Desislava Kalaydjieva | Analysis | 7:00 - 14:00 analysis shift |
(See
https://triumfoffice365-my.sharepoint.com/:w:/g/personal/dillmann_triumf_ca/Eb_LCp7yTx5Bgc8TO8khJmEBWeS-ycdPRnG02wQout-fgQ?rtime=3n3A3xMR2Ug
for remote shifter instructions. To be updated/corrected by the experts)
08:00 Analysed data from 6 am to 7 am (Note file names are one hour behind).
Using e143_analyzer.py -t 0.5 E143-245MHz-2021.05.07.05.*
See attachments 1,2,3
08:17 Analysed data from 7am to 8am (Note file names are still one hour behind)
As above.
See attachments 4,5,6
Analysed data from 8am to 9am (Note file names are still one hour behind)
As above.
See attachment 7
At 8:50 Yury changes trigger on scope from 50% to 1% (minimum value).
We should now have the beginning of the injection as well, and isomers should appear at 0.1 s
9:35 Lost beam from SIS
09:45 Analysed data from 9am to 9:30 am (Note file names are still one hour behind)
These are the first data with the new trigger settings
As above
See attachment 8
11:50 Beam is back, scraper being optimised.
12:30 Scraper optimisation complete.
13:00 Analysed data from 12:30 to 12:45 roughly.
Attach 9 - default code. -t 0.5
Attach 10 - new untested code with skip function. See Slack#analysis. -t 0.5 -s 0.2
Attach 11 - as 10, log scale on the y
13:48 Analysed data from to 12:30 to 13:35
-t 0.5 Attach 12
-t 1 Attach 13 (log y)
14:05 Lost beam in ESR
14:30 Analysed data from 13:00 to 14:00 before we lost beam.
-t 0.2 -s 0.1
Attach 13 & 14
14:35 Beam is back
15:00 Shift handed over to AG and CJC |
Attachment 1: 210507_6am.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 210507_6am_zoom.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 210507_6am_log.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 210507_7am.png
|
|
Attachment 5: 210507_7am_zoom.png
|
|
Attachment 6: 210507_7am_log.png
|
|
Attachment 7: 210507_8am_log.png
|
|
Attachment 8: 210507_9-9.30am_log.png
|
|
Attachment 9: 11.30_11.45_t0.5.png
|
|
Attachment 10: 12am_t0.5_s0.2.png
|
|
Attachment 11: 12am_t0.5_s0.2_log.png
|
|
Attachment 12: 11.23_12.30.png
|
|
Attachment 13: 1_11.23_12.30_log.png
|
|
Attachment 14: 1pm_0.2_0.1png.PNG
|
|
Attachment 15: 1pm_0.2_0.1_zoom.PNG
|
|
140
|
Tue Jun 29 21:10:30 2021 |
Shahab | Runs | 72-Ge setting |
the new setting is roughly 400 khz lower in frequency.
Previous beam time Ge was on 243.100 now it is on 242.74
we decided to use the higher harmonic:
expecting it on 244.66 MHz |
220
|
Fri Jul 2 20:33:44 2021 |
Yuri | Accelerator | 70Se setting with closed scrapers |
We tune back to 70Se.
The scrapers stay closed at EEXDS2HA=0 mm, EEXDS1HG=+5 mm
"Single"-particle run |
65
|
Sat May 8 01:43:23 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Accelerator | 70Se setting |
If gamma_t = 1.3955 Tm stays, we will need Brho = 6.21902 Tm for 70Se.
The corresponding ESR Brho setting will be a bit shifted.
It then requires E-SIS = 446.55 MeV/u to get 70Se to this Brho and gamma_t.
For pre-drilling with 78Kr beam at same Brho use 416.70 MeV/u.
But we could also make a quick try without tuning before, just change all energies. |
147
|
Wed Jun 30 08:59:37 2021 |
Yuri | Accelerator | 70Se setting |
X(9Be)=1.815 g/cm2 (adjusted in primary beam setting)
Gamma_t=1.3956
E(70Se)=368.499 MeV/u
Br(70Se)=6.21993 Tm
Pre-drilling:
E(78Kr)@Br(70Se)=337.461 MeV/u
E(SIS) = 415.792 MeV/u
Fragment Setting:
E(SIS) = 445.68 MeV/u |
31
|
Fri May 7 04:26:54 2021 |
Shahab | Runs | 245 MHz resonator extra 20dB gain off |
made sure that the extra 20dB amplifier is off. |
151
|
Wed Jun 30 13:04:40 2021 |
Shahab | Runs | 245 Amplifier on |
turned on extra 20dB amplifier for the 245 Resonator around 12:32 |
Attachment 1: amplification_on245.png
|
|
202
|
Fri Jul 2 07:31:44 2021 |
The remote Canadian eager beavers (Iris and Guy) | Analysis | 00h to 05h Summed Spectra |
Using the scripts I posted previously, I summed 5.5 hours of data from midnight to 5:30 July 2nd CEST.
I used 10ms time steps for better time resolution, but that did leave questionable frequency resolution. If anyone would like to see higher resolved frequency plots for the
full 5 hours, let me know.
I've attached the spectra from 0s to 4s for the 410MHz and 0s to 2s for the 245MHz, including zooming in on the injection timing.
Given that we are summing 5 hours of data so the background is very smooth, I can only conclude that either the isomer doesn't exit, we cannot resolve it, or we are
producing incredibly low amounts such that the search needs to be needle in a haystack. |
Attachment 1: 245MHz-07.02.00-05h-sum_10ms.png
|
|
Attachment 2: 245MHz-07.02.00-05h-sum_10ms_zoom.png
|
|
Attachment 3: 410MHz-07.02.00-05h-sum_10ms.png
|
|
Attachment 4: 410MHz-07.02.00-05h-sum_10ms_zoom.png
|
|
83
|
Sat May 8 21:42:51 2021 |
All | Accelerator | Set up for 52Mn |
Details will follow
E(Mn) = 368.41 MeV/u |