HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018
  Laser Cooling Experiment 2021, Page 4 of 5  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Author Category Subjectup
  50   Fri May 14 08:55:53 2021 SebastianGeneralToDO 14.5 ...so far
1.) ion lasser overlap and scraper test

2.) change bunching frequency to middle of ecooled coasting beam

3.) long time measurements see labbook HKR
3.1) try ecooler on/off ; bunch on / off ; laser fixed on / off ; laser scanning on / off ; try different bunching amplitudes (MAX :LEV 0.25V) ; try other h = 10, 7, etc...
3.2) Dont forget to plug in the schottky trigger -> maybe change acquisition and analysis time if needed

4.) XUV detector tests
4.1.) laser - bunch timing by checking xuv anode signal
  51   Fri May 14 09:00:55 2021 SebastianGeneralUNILAC Problems
~30 min downtime

--> LASER ADJUSTEMENTS!
  70   Sun May 16 02:18:53 2021 SebastianGeneralUV Drop
1:25 a.m. huge drop in UV laser power
-> small crystal bump with both y screws of bbo oven
  19   Wed May 12 10:15:47 2021 Volker HannenDAQUnplugged TDC inputs for MCP front and back
To reduce the load on the VUPROM TDC, we unplugged the TDC inputs for the front and back signals of the MCP of the XUV detector.
The Anode signal is still plugged in and should be sufficient for the analysis.
  28   Wed May 12 23:36:18 2021 Ken UeberholzDAQVI change
carbon main vi - kopie is now in operation

here, in keysight.vi the input settings for the new impedence for the multimeter are now hopefully correct --> THIS SHOULD BE CHECKED IF THE RING IS OPEN 
  39   Thu May 13 18:34:54 2021 Ken UeberholzGeneralWhat happened scince shift change at 4pm
Ion frequency shifts with laser, both manually and scanned, without bunches: successful
Bunching with 7 and 20 bunches: successful
Tried laser scans with bunches: unsuccessful
Manual laser scans with bunches: successful
  42   Thu May 13 23:42:37 2021 Ken UeberholzGeneralWhat was done
In this shift a number of successful Schottky measurements were done:
With fixed laser wavelength, while varying the wavelength, with different bunching and more (see logfile 1 for more info: line 53 to at least 107).
The detector software sometimes files to change the current of the power supplies, if this happens a simple restart of the GUI fixes the problem.
Once in this shift the Mesytek in the laser lab turned itself (?) off and the background rate increased. Hopefully this was a single event.
Attachment 1: Schottky1.jpeg
Schottky1.jpeg
Attachment 2: Schottky2.jpeg
Schottky2.jpeg
Attachment 3: Schottky3.jpeg
Schottky3.jpeg
Attachment 4: Schottky4.jpeg
Schottky4.jpeg
  85   Tue May 31 07:29:11 2022 KenDetectorsXUV-Detektor
Rate was very low: ~ 100Hz
Adjusted Walk level and Threshold, new rate: 5kHz
Additionally, parameters of the detector were varied for optimization but were returned to default afterwards.
  48   Fri May 14 07:20:18 2021 Team #NightGeneralactual bunching frequency
25,82556 MHz
h = 20
  61   Sat May 15 03:39:16 2021 TeamGeneralactual revolution frequency
frev = 1,2912735 MHz
  6   Tue May 11 20:14:43 2021 DanyalGeneralbad ESR vacuum
I just heard that the ESR vacuum is quite bad. 
There was a small vacuum problem a while ago, it was sealed, but apparently the pressure is not as low as usual.

Markus Steck said that the beam lifetime is only 15 - 20 seconds !!! 

This will seriously complicate some of our test experiments :( 
  31   Thu May 13 01:01:27 2021 DanyalDAQbunched ion beam
Attachment 1: bunched_-_signal.jpg
bunched_-_signal.jpg
Attachment 2: bunched_-_Schottky.jpg
bunched_-_Schottky.jpg
Attachment 3: zoom_bunched_-_Schottky.jpg
zoom_bunched_-_Schottky.jpg
  Draft   Fri May 14 07:33:42 2021 Team #NightGeneralecooler central frequency shifted relative to bunch central frequency
  5   Tue May 11 18:29:35 2021 DanyalGeneralfirst ions in the ESR
Attachment 1: first_ions_are_injected.jpg
first_ions_are_injected.jpg
  11   Wed May 12 08:32:04 2021 SebastianAnalysisfluorescence & energetic overlap
During the night shift we saw several rises of the fluorescence (see another entry) and also energetic overlap in coasting beam modus.
Here the laser wavelength was stabilized @ 1028,967nm and electron cooler was switched off because of some fluctuations which we saw in the schottky.
Left part of the schottky picture shows the c3+ beam, the right part is the o4+ contamination.
Attachment 1: Screenshot_(154).png
Screenshot_(154).png
  25   Wed May 12 22:35:33 2021 DanyalGeneralfrev and fb
Schottky frequency (189th harmonic) = 244.033662 MHz

revolution frequency  frev = 1.2911834 MHz

bunching frequency h=2  --> fb = 2.582367 MHz
bunching frequency h=10  --> fb = 12.911834 MHz
  21   Wed May 12 15:36:04 2021 DanyalAcceleratorgeneral power failure in ESR! (everything is off)
The power in the ESR is off. 
(also on the gas-target area on top of ESR)
Electrical engineers are trying to find and fix the problem. 
  8   Wed May 12 02:34:29 2021 DanyalGeneralinstabilities in ion frequency
The ion beam moves around, pretty arbitrary. See picture. 
ESR crew believes that it is not due to fluctuations in the HV of the E-Cooler. 
Attachment 1: fluctuations.jpg
fluctuations.jpg
  10   Wed May 12 08:10:17 2021 LarsGeneralinstabilities in ion frequency
looks like the E-Cooler is responsible for this. If one turns off the electron current, the beam stays stable. 
M.Steck is informed.

> The ion beam moves around, pretty arbitrary. See picture. 
> ESR crew believes that it is not due to fluctuations in the HV of the E-Cooler. 
  32   Thu May 13 01:05:45 2021 DanyalDAQmore stability by bunching
Because the C3+ part of the ion beam is properly bunched, it is no longer so sensitive to the drifts caused by the e-cooler. 
In the O4+ part of the ion beam these drifts can still be seen. 
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b