ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
30
|
Tue May 10 21:41:17 2022 |
Rodolfo | Accelerator | T-Scraper |
The T-Scrapers at the electron cooler have an issue. They can't be moved in the horizontal direction using the DeviceControl. |
34
|
Tue May 10 23:53:42 2022 |
Rodolfo | General | shift change |
The night shift took over. They are trying now to overlap the ion and laser beams. |
44
|
Wed May 11 14:59:01 2022 |
Rodolfo | Laser | Laser status |
I have measured the output energy of the laser system. All values in [mJ] and over 500 laser-pulses average
Date | Out of Quanta Ray @ 532 nm | Seed energy for Cobra @ 532 nm | Out of Cobra @ 601 nm
|
10.05.2022 | 533 | 485 | 71
|
11.05.2022 | 484 | 480 | 67
|
|
70
|
Mon May 16 15:57:37 2022 |
Rodolfo | Laser | Wavemeter calibration |
I have calibrated our Wavemeter WS7 using the temperature stabilized He-Ne Laser (SIOS EN60 825-1:2014). In the screenshots below you can see the readout of the wavemeter before (vor) and after (nach) calibration. |
82
|
Fri May 27 14:57:23 2022 |
Rodolfo | Laser | Laser Energy |
I have started up the laser system (Q-Ray & Cobra) again. Here some parameters*:
- Q-Ray's output energy (@532 nm: 547 mJ.
- Seed energy for Cobra# (@532 nm): 504 mJ.
- Cobra's output energy (@ 601.7 nm): 71 mJ.
* all values averaged over 500 pulses.
# angle of lambda/2-plate: 107° |
108
|
Wed Jun 1 17:20:04 2022 |
Rodolfo | Laser | HeNe @ WS7 |
|
111
|
Fri Jan 13 17:05:22 2023 |
Rodolfo | Laser | Testing WS6 |
Testing the new Wavemeter (HighFinesse, WS6, SN3950) with the QRAY laser light @ 532 nm. Multimode fiber von High Finesse:FC/PC S (Corning, MM, OM2) |
112
|
Wed Jan 18 13:02:12 2023 |
Rodolfo | Laser | Testing WS6 with Cobra |
Testing the WS6 (S.N. 3950) together with the Cobra.
Cobra operated with dye DCM in Ethanol + DMSO (Concentration 1:1)
- Oscillator concentration 0.3 g/l.
- Main amplifier concentration 0.0375 g/l (1/8 oscillator concentration).
- Laser linewidth: 6 GHz. Expansion factor: 10x. Grating: 2400 g/mm (40/2013)
Seed energy: 504 mJ @ 532 nm.
Cobra output energy: 112 mJ @ 640 nm.
Scan settings: 640.0 nm - 639.8 nm @ 0.005 nm / step.
Wavemeter settings: Pulsed (ext. trigg. 1 = QRay-Output: Lamp Sync). Precision: Fine.
- Wavemeter calibration. Reference source: Neon lamp.
- LTA-Data under ATPPC023 D:\WLM6 LTA data\D:\WLM6 (18.01.2023, 11.23, 640,10656 nm.lta) |
113
|
Tue Jun 6 09:33:00 2023 |
Rodolfo | Laser | Fiber coupler |
Cobra's new fiber-coupling unit for wavelength reading. |
56
|
Thu May 12 10:21:30 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | No Beam |
There is no beam in the ESR due to some problem in the UNILAC. |
57
|
Thu May 12 11:30:18 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | Beam is back |
Beam is back in the ESR. |
59
|
Thu May 12 12:02:56 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | No beam |
There is no beam in the ESR again. |
60
|
Thu May 12 12:51:30 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | Beam is back |
12:50 Beam is back again in the ring.
12:52-until now Kicker problem in the ESR. |
69
|
Mon May 16 14:20:05 2022 |
Ragan, Danyal, Carsten, Phillip, Wilfried et al. | General | E128 Beamtime |
> Dear all,
>
> unfortunately, the E128 experiment must now come to an early end.
> The problem(s) with the injection septum are severe and no work around solution (with acceptable risks) could be found.
> Several things were tried, but without hope.
>
> Many thanks to everybody involved during the preparation time and the shifts during the beamtime.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Wilfried
There is beam again in the ESR. The plan is to take beam until tomorrow morning. |
29
|
Tue May 10 20:35:42 2022 |
Phillip, Wilfried, Max | Detectors | PMT Threshold |
Since we have ions in the ring now, we looked at the PMT thresholds and the widths. In order to do so we looked at the Raw Signal directly before the CFD and its output simultaneously. You can now set the threshold just above the noise. If the threshold is too low you will also see flat lines in the oscilloscope when triggered on the CFD output. New values:
PMT Mitte
---
Width: 200 -> 220 (60ns -> 90ns)
Threshold: 20 -> 5
PMT Nord
---
Width: 200 -> 220 (60ns -> 90ns)
Threshold: 12 -> 10
PMT Süd
---
blind. |
48
|
Wed May 11 22:04:30 2022 |
Phillip, Wilfried, Max | General | spacial laser - ion overlap verified |
After the SIS/ESR optimization we checked the spatial overlap with the T-scrapers again.
The values are:
device | move in dir. | scratch (mm) | gone (mm)
|
GECEDS1VU | up | -3.0 | -2.2 |
|
| | | |
|
GECEDS1HA | right | -22.9 | -22.0 |
|
| left | -11.0 | -13.0 |
|
| | | |
|
GECEDS2VU | up | -4.5 | -2.7 |
|
| | | |
|
GECEDS2HA | right | -21.0 | -19.6 |
|
| left | -7.8 | -8.4 |
|
The beam position is approx. as before. The laser position is still good and we have spatial overlap. |
53
|
Thu May 12 00:16:13 2022 |
Patrick, Volker, Guy, Rui-Jiu | Runs | Runs night shift |
Time | SIS-intensity | ESR-intensity after orbit change | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width increment (nm) | dwell time(s) | n loops | comments
|
00:15 | ~1.0e8 | 1.0e7 | 223219 | 433 - 435 | 8094 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 4 |
|
00:47 | 3.7e8 | 2.0e7 | 223219 | 436 - 440 | 8095 - 8096 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 8 | increased to 15 injections, still not saturated
|
| | | | | | | | | | Tried 20 injections, got no injection into ESR, so moved back to 15. The scrapers were not moving for quiet some time, even after fixing them.
The problem may have been that two ParamModi windows were opened. The injection into the SIS does not work when there are other users performing special operations with the machines.
|
02:28 | 1.0e8 | 1.0e7 | 223220 | 441 - 444 | 8097 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
02:54 | 2.8e8 | 1.7e7 | 223219 | 445 - 449 | 8098 - 8099 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
03:21 | ~3e8 | ~2e7 | 223219 | DAQ did not write | 8100 - 8101 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | The vacuum gauge of the e-cooler failed. It was restarted. Apparently, upon changing/fixing anything related to our accelerator pattern, the scrapers forget to move.
Then they have to be disabled and enabled again in ParamModi. Also, the injection does not work very well. Either the transition from SIS to ESR fails or we are just skipped completely.
After fixing the injection, again the scrapers failed as expected. We keep the scrapers out now.
|
04:34 | 2.8e8 | 1.8e7 | 223219 | DAQ failed, started late 454 - 458 | 8102 - 8103 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 | Set max.counts in PMT middle and north to 15 (In file 'SetConditions.C', applied when starting go4). No scrapers used.
|
05:02 | 2.5e8 | 1.7e7 | 223219 | DAQ late, 461 - 464 | 8104 - 8105 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
05:30 | 2.5e8 | 1.8e7 | 223219 | 465 - 469 | 8106 - 8107 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 | Set max.counts in PMT middle and north to 20.
|
05:57 | 2.5e8 | 1.7e7 | 223219 | 470 - 474 | 8108 - 8109 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
06:25 | 2.6e8 | 1.7e7 | 223219 | 475 - 479 | 8110 - 8111 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
06:50 | 2.4e8 | 1.6e7 | 223219 | 480 - 484 | 8112 - 8113 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
07:24 | 2.2e8 | 1.5e7 | 223219 | 485 - 489 | 8114 - 8115 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 |
|
07:49 | - | 6.5e6 | 223219 | 490 - 493 | 8116 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 | UNILAC tunnel will be open for ~1h -> no new beam from SIS available
|
08:15 | - | 2.6e6 | 223219 | 494 - 496 | 8117 | 601.62 - 601.405 | 0.005 | 5s | 6 | UNILAC tunnel will be open for ~1h -> no new beam from SIS available
|
|
37
|
Wed May 11 03:17:14 2022 |
Patrick, Volker, Guy | Runs | Start laser scanning |
Runs of the night shift. The wavelength range is 601.95 - 601.735 nm.
We started the wavemeter python script on atppc023 located in Desktop/wavemeter_Bi.
We changed the wavelength range in go4 to the actual scan range.
Questions:
There are many other masses/isotopes/etc. visible in the Shottky spectrum. Is this wanted?
Are the vacuum gauges turned off?
Laser timing correct? +- 3 bins?
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
03:30 | ?e7 | 223218 | 373 | 8073 | 601.95 - 601.735 | 0.005 | 5s | 2 loops
|
03:38 | 9.0e7 | 223218 | 374-377 | 8074 | 601.95 - 601.735 | 0.005 | 5s | 8 loops from now on
|
04:15 | 8.4e7 | 223218 | 378 - 381 | 8075 | 601.95 - 601.735 | 0.005 | 5s |
|
04:49 | 7.4e7 | 223217 | 382 - 385 | 8076 | 601.95 - 601.735 | 0.005 | 5s |
|
05:23 | 6.4e7 | 223216 | 386 - 388 | 8078 | 601.95 - 601.735 | 0.005 | 5s | 8077 was skipped due to some "server socket locked"-error
|
05:59 | 8.9e7 | 223218 | 389 - 391 | 8079 | 601.95 - 601.735 | 0.005 | 5s |
|
|
36
|
Wed May 11 03:10:55 2022 |
Patrick, Sebastian, Volker, Guy | Laser | Laser - bunch timing |
We added the delay and gate generator in between the bunch trigger and the CFD to move the timing of the PMT middle signal relative to the photodiodes north and south.
The center value of PD-North is at 19 bins, PD-South at 55 bins, the middle is therefore at 37 bins. The PMT peak should be half a revolution, ie 75 bins further in the histogram, giving a peak position of 112, from which then 3 bins are subtracted to account for the distance of the PMT-middle from the center of the straight section. So all in all the delay is adjusted so the PMT-middle peak appears at 109 bins (see attached plot). |
35
|
Wed May 11 01:09:07 2022 |
Patrick, Sebastian, Volker, Guy | Laser | Beam overlap |
We overlapped the laser with the ion beam.
The ion beam positions are:
device | move in dir. | scratch (mm) | gone (mm) | gone + 4.5 (mm) | x0 (mm)
|
GECEDS1VU | up | -3.0 | -2.7 | 1.8 |
|
| | | | |
|
GECEDS1HA | right | -21.9 | -20.9 | -16.4 | -4.7
|
| left | -12.0 | -13.1 | |
|
| | | | |
|
GECEDS2VU | up | -3.8 | -2.9 | 1.6 |
|
| | | | |
|
GECEDS2HA | right | -19.2 | -18.4 | -13.9 | in [-0.1, 4.3]
|
| left | -9.0 | -9.7 | |
|
We used the "gone + 4.5" column where the scraper is in the middle of the ion beam to adjust the laser.
Picture 1: Final beam position.
Picture 2: Final MRC settings.
Note 1: By switching to the "real" bunching frequency, the laser went out of the stabilization. We restarted the MRC system and shifted the laser back into position with the piezo mirror, looking at the first screen (without amplifiers!).
After enabling everything again, the before found settings did not correspond to the correct beam position anymore, so we overlapped again.
Note 2: After the repositioning, the horizontal screw was at its limit and the beam stabilization failed. We moved the screw away from the limit while still hitting the screen and restarted the MRC system. The laser could then be stabilized again. |