HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038 E0075 E0203_E0018 E0052_2025
  Dielectronic recombination-assisted laser spectroscopy, Page 4 of 6  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Authordown Category Subject
  15   Fri May 6 16:41:57 2022 Patrick, RodolfoLaserWavemeter
We coupled the laser through a multi-mode fiber into the wavemeter.
With the main amplifier enabled, we got enough power behind the fiber (0.5 - 1.5 mW) to use the wavemeter with 34 ms exposure time (1s / 30Hz to prevent jumps in the wavemeter readout).

Pictures below: 
1: First test scan with 34ms exp. time.
2: Comp. too large laser power (2. scan duoblet) vs. attenuated power (right scan doublet). The latter has less hickups.
3: Laser scan with attenuated power in go4.

The measured frequencies in the first scan step are unstable in any case.

Spikes (rather "second wavelength the laser is regulrarly jumping to") can be removed by adjusting the fiber coupling with the mirrors (change of interference pattern) or the L/2-waveplate (change of coupled power).
However, during (and after) the scan the spikes seem to reappear.
Attachment 1: Screenshot_(4).png
Screenshot_(4).png
Attachment 2: Bi2022_laserscan_test.PNG
Bi2022_laserscan_test.PNG
  87   Mon May 30 02:33:45 2022 Patrick, MBS MaxDAQMBS procedure
It is possible to keep go4 running now. Summary of the procedure:

DAC1: open file lxg1297:/data.local2/208Bi/208Bi -auto -rfio
DAC2: open file lxg0155:/data.local2/E128/Bi -auto -rfio
sta ac
start go4

measure

stop go4
sto ac
clo fi

repeat
  77   Mon May 16 22:57:40 2022 Patrick, Kristian, David, Ruijiu DetectorsSwitched off nitrogen
Background counts with nitrogen and air.
Less multiphoton events with air (see pictures, histogram extended to 30 with nitrogen).


Read in 4_Lasersteps/Counts

nitrogen:
XUV: 15e4
Middle: 8e4
North: 9e4

air:
XUV: 13e4
Middle: 1.2e4
North: 0.7e4
Attachment 1: 2022-05-16_PMTs_after_nitrogen_off.png
2022-05-16_PMTs_after_nitrogen_off.png
  78   Tue May 17 00:44:01 2022 Patrick, KristianDAQChanged PMT North CFD channel
In run 8134 - 8135 PMT North showed a super high background rate. After the scan we checked the signal cables.

Incoming signal was still good until CFD. We changed channel from 2 to 12. New threshold is 36, was 10.
  97   Tue May 31 03:18:52 2022 Patrick, KonstantinLaserLaser timing
The final timings are (in bins +-1):

PD NO: 103
PD SO: 138
PMT middle: 44
e-cooler = (PD NO + PD SO) / 2: 121
e-cooler - PMT middle: 77
roundtrip / 2: 75
roundtrip / 2 + 10ns: 78
  51   Wed May 11 23:34:39 2022 Patrick, CarstenDetectorsParticle Detectors / Scraper positions
Voltages of particle detectors off.

Scraper positions:

GE02DS3HG: -8
GE01DD2AG: -25
GE01DD2IG: 6
GE02DD2_G: -30
  54   Thu May 12 03:25:37 2022 PatrickDAQLaser scan complete signal off
As in ID:46, the 'laser scan complete' again is not coming in.
It is not very useful to repeatedly fix cable contact problems.
Therefore, Carsten is adding a 'number of steps' line to the config file to "repeat" the x-axis.
  76   Mon May 16 22:19:54 2022 PatrickDAQKeep go4 running (in theory), MBS
To accumulate more data into the opened go4, do not restart MBS, but just

sto ac
clo fi
open file lxg1297:/data.local2/208Bi/208Bi -auto -rfio
sta ac

Note: This does not work, because go4 somehow accumulates ~5 extra laser steps when starting a new scan which results in an x-axis-offset between the runs.
  65   Thu May 12 16:35:17 2022 Max, Wilfried, ZoranAcceleratorNO BEAM UNTIL TOMORROW MORNING
The problem at the ESR septum is serious. They have to remove the broken part and try to repair it.
Maybe tomorrow in the morning briefing there will be more information about this.

The night shift will not take place!
The morning shift starts at 9:00 or on further notice!

The PMTs are switched off and the laser also.
  49   Wed May 11 22:19:17 2022 Max, Wilfried, VolkerLaserlaser bunch timing
We overlapped the laser and ion bunch in the time domain. The delay has to be set on the module above the laser and NOT in the ESR Messhütte!

The values are:

PD NO: 63
PD SO: 98.5
Ion bunch: 150 
Attachment 1: timing10_5_22.png
timing10_5_22.png
  50   Wed May 11 22:45:22 2022 Max, Wilfried, PatrickGeneralscanning wavelength
The scan parameters for the next shift are:

in COBRACONTROL:

increment: 0,005nm

from position: 601,62nm

to position: 601,405nm

These are the wavelengths in air!


The wavelength in vacuum we expect is: 601.832nm

You can check the current wavelength in vacuum on the wavemeter in the LabView GUI.

edit: In the night shift, we checked the scanned vacuum wavelengths in the wavemeter and also checked the expected transition wavelength.
The resonance should be very much in the center of the above mentioned scan range.
The increment corresponds to 4.1 GHz steps. Is this small enough?
  74   Mon May 16 19:20:55 2022 Max, WilfriedAnalysisstart go4 before laser scan
It is necessary to start go4 before you start the laser scan. Otherwise you get an offset in the laser Step plots.
  104   Tue May 31 21:58:55 2022 Max, RodolfoLaserMRC Settings for 209Bi
We have change the laser settings for the spectroscopy of 209Bi.

We have now T-scraped the laser beam to the old position of the ion beam. The settings for the MRC system are shown in the screenshot below.
Attachment 1: MRC_209Bi_31-05-2022_2157.png
MRC_209Bi_31-05-2022_2157.png
  86   Mon May 30 02:12:20 2022 Max, Patrick, ~Konstantin, Ragan, KenRunsruns night shift 30.05.
These are the first runs of the substitute beamtime.

Time ESR-intensity ESR-intensity after orbit change cooler-HV LMD-DAQ2 file nr LMD-DAQ1 file nr scan range(nm) step width increment (nm) dwell time(s) n loops comments
02:00 ? 8.0e6 223217 632 8158 601.95 - 601.734 0.005 5s 5 Resonance found in first scan. The resonance is much broader due to a broader ion beam.
02:28 ? 7.0e6 223217 633 8159 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Same injection.
02:52 ? 6.3e6 223217 634 8160 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Same injection. Adjusted gates in go4.
03:14 ? 5.6e6 223439 637 8163 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Same injection. Auto-impedance enabled -> correct voltages. NTCAP started shortly after scan start.
03:35 ? 3.0e5 ? (under range) 223439 639 8164 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Scraped the lower charge state beam by moving S1HA to pos. -30 (from the left).
04:50 ? 1.1e7 223439 640 8165 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Laser beam position slightly corrected for new ion beam position, see ID:84.
05:05 ? 1.0e7 223439 641 8166 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 See picture (this + previous run)
05:21 ? 1.0e7 223439 642 8167 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Moved S1HA to -35 to get rid of the charge transferred beam.
05:33 ? 9.0e6 223439 644 8169 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5
05:52 ? 9.0e5 223439 645 8170 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 5s 5 Scraped main beam for lower beam intensities.
There were some issue with the acquisition, and thus there are some empty files
06:08 ? 4.e5 223438 650- 8172 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 3s 25
07:11 ? 1.15e7 223438 653 8173 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 3s 25 laser scan was not started
07:17 ? 1.03e7 223438 654-656 8174 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 3s 25
08:33 ? 6e6 223438 658-660 8176 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 3s 25 ESR scraper not in
09:27 ? 5.5e6 223438 661-667 8178 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 3s 25 XUV detector running again, signal of PMT north and middle in att. 2
10:15 ? <<1e6 223438 668 8179 601.9 - 601.7 0.005 3s 25 very low beam intensity


Note: PMT north does not see a resonance.

Note: PMT north does see a resonance after changing to the broadband PMT.
Attachment 1: 2022-05-30_resonance_10_loops.png
2022-05-30_resonance_10_loops.png
Attachment 2: 48_AM.png
48_AM.png
  84   Mon May 30 00:56:33 2022 Max, PatrickLaserBeam overlap
The ion beam positions are (+- 1mm):


devicemove in dir.scratch (mm)gone (mm)gone +- 4.5 (mm)x0 (mm)
GECEDS1VUup -1.5 0.7 5.2
GECEDS1HAright -26 -22 -17.5 -4.7
left -10.0 -13.0 -17.5
GECEDS2VUup -2.0 0.0 4.5
GECEDS2HAright -22.0 -18.5 -14.0 3.1
left -6.0 -9.5 -14.0



Notes:
  • In between a measurement the scrapers stopped working in the device control. Therefore, we had to go into the electronics room.
  • Position to scratch charge transferred beam: S1HA at -35.
  • Beam diameter is roughly 6-7 mm (horizontally) and 4 mm vertically (as opposed to 1-2 mm).
  • The charge transferred ion beam seems to shift the position of the main beam over time (1cm / 2h) as the main beam "transfers its intensity".
Attachment 1: 2022-05-30_laser_beam.png
2022-05-30_laser_beam.png
Attachment 2: 2022-05-30_beamstab_settings.png
2022-05-30_beamstab_settings.png
  63   Thu May 12 15:34:47 2022 Max, Kristian, SebastianDAQlaser scan, laser step and laser busy checked
We checked all three signals in the Messhütte. Laser scan and laser step are OK.
The Laser busy signal is for large increments (0.1nm) also fine. For short increments like our usual 0.005nm increment the signal is irregularly.
Likely the laser busy status is too short.
  72   Mon May 16 17:38:38 2022 Max, Danyal, Wilfried, RodolfoGenerallaser bunch timing
We overlapped the laser and ion bunch in the time domain. 
Therefore we delayed the bunching HF in order to see the PMT signal between bin 10 and 22. Before the signal Peak was in channel ~145-5 and difficult to gate on.
Afterwards we also have to shift the laser.
The new values are:

PD NO: 77.5
PD SO: 113
Ion bunch: 16.5 
Attachment 1: timing1605.png
timing1605.png
  99   Tue May 31 17:22:09 2022 Max, Carsten, Danyal, Rodolfo, WilfriedGeneralchange E-cooler current I_e = 50 mA
At 17:15 we changed again the E-cooler current I_e = 50 mA  
(4 laser scan loops per injection) 
E-cool HV = 225248 V 
  98   Tue May 31 15:19:58 2022 Max, Carsten, DanyalGeneralscans for different E-cool currents
until 15:15 we have measured with I_e = 100 mA (3 loops per file) 
E_cool HV = 225255 V 


after that (at 15:26) we changed to I_e = 200 mA (2 loops per file) 
E_cool HV = 225272 V 

after that (at 17:15) we changed to I_e = 50 mA (first 4 then 6 loops per file) 
E_cool HV = 225247 V 
  64   Thu May 12 15:50:33 2022 MaxAcceleratorNo ESR beam
Since 13:30 we have no beam in the ESR. There is a problem with the ESR septum.
The magnets department is investigating.
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b