HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038 E0075 E0203_E0018 E0052_2025
  Nuclear hyperfine mixing in 229Th89+ 2025, Page 2 of 4  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Authordown Category Subject
  28   Fri Jun 20 06:37:51 2025 KonstantinAcceleratorPosition of contaminants
I checked the positions of the contaminants. Therefore, I drove the scrapers and observed the signal at the Schottky detector

While the vertical positions are identical for all scrapers, the horizontal positions deviate due to the dispersion in the cooler section

Scraper -83.75kHz -26.875 0 61kHz 83.25 110.625
GECEDS1VU -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5 -0.5
GECEDS1HA (from 75mm) -4 -5 -5.2 -6.6 -6.9 -7.2
GECEDS1HA (from -75mm) -11.8 -12.8 -13.3 -14.5 -15.1 -15.7
GECEDS2VU 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
  56   Tue Jun 24 15:44:06 2025 KonstantinDAQPhase shift in DAQ1
In the SetParameters.C file is a parameter called fPar->piPhaseOffset. It was shifted from 100 to 50 in order to see ion bunches in the pmt signal and laser pulses in the photodiode signal during the same revolution in the TDC spectrum. Note that this parameter must be taken 
into account when setting the window conditions of the arrival time in the SetConditions.C file. 
  29   Fri Jun 20 11:25:32 2025 Julien, Kristian, KonstantinLaserAutomated laser scans
In contrast to entry E12, the cabling for the automated start of the laser scan is now connected to IO3 of sddsc221.
  24   Wed Jun 18 11:44:15 2025 Julien, Konstantin, Stefan, Rima Jitter CFD
Pulses on photodiodes in entry 20 

1. seem wide, so we also looked at qswitch signal; also seemes wide.
2. Have a tail

1.:

We investigated this and came to the conclusion, that the CFD is the issue:
- On an oscilloscope, when looking at both HF signal (CFD input) and CFD output, there is a 2ns jitter.
- The same jitter is visible when looking at the CFD output when triggering on a freq. generator signal with same frequency and amplitude as HF signal (1.54263 MHz; 1V peak to peak).
- There is not significant jitter when comparing the CFD output and the qswitch signal

We tried differents CFD (also a leading edge CFD / different thresholds), but this did not significantly improve what we saw on the oscilloscope.
Applying a 10MHz filter to the HF signal only made the jitter worse.
There might be an option to get a logic (NIM) signal from ESR instead of the sin-signal
Alternatively, one could think about using a PLL.
Note: the 2ns might also be limited by the trigger of the oscilloscope. We saw that if the trigger of the oscilloscope is not on the steepest part of the HF signal, the jitter "gets worse".

2.:

We saw on the qswtich signal, that there are instances, when  the q-switch signal is too early; 
Ww will try to find out which NIM module between the CFD and the final qswitch signal causes this
Preliminary: It's coincidance crate
  25   Wed Jun 18 14:01:40 2025 Julien, Konstantin, Stefan, Rima Ion bunch on PMTs
Apparentlty did not work yesterday evening (no signal), but looks fine now (see attachment)
Attachment 1: Bildschirmfoto_bunch_on_PMT_2025-06-18_14-11-44.png
Bildschirmfoto_bunch_on_PMT_2025-06-18_14-11-44.png
  22   Wed Jun 18 07:59:00 2025 Julien, KonstantinLaserPhase-offset
We recognized that the output power of the pump laser was instable when externally triggered with 200kHz (stand-bye frequency of ESR). Therefore, we changed the coarse timing offset of the pockels cell trigger compared to the flash lamp pulse from 215µs to 219.9µs. 
Thereby, the output power increased from ~600mJ to 620mJ, and the PTP stability improved from 15% to 10%. The RMS stability improved from 2% to 1.2 %. With these settings we had UV pulse energies of 20mJ.
Attachment 1: IMG_3889.jpg
IMG_3889.jpg
Attachment 2: IMG_3888.jpg
IMG_3888.jpg
Attachment 3: IMG_3891.jpg
IMG_3891.jpg
Attachment 4: IMG_3892.jpg
IMG_3892.jpg
  23   Wed Jun 18 08:07:17 2025 Julien, KonstantinLasernew FCU Calibration
UV power was not stable but dropping from ~18 mW to 13 mW after opening COBRA shutters.
New calibration of frequency conversion unit:

Wavelength/nm       Position/Steps
554,0001            383029
553,0000            386604
552,0001            390229
551,0000            393954
550,0001            397679
549,0001            401404
548,0001            405104
547,0001            408829

now stable at ~19-20 mJ depending on wavelength

Table of dataset: Attachement 1
Plot of dataset: Attachement 2
Attachment 1: 2025_06_18_FCU_Cal_Table.JPG
2025_06_18_FCU_Cal_Table.JPG
Attachment 2: 2025_06_18_FCU_Cal_Plot.JPG
2025_06_18_FCU_Cal_Plot.JPG
  51   Mon Jun 23 10:52:34 2025 Julian, Lukas, Zsolt, Nadine, KonstantinLaserFrequency conversion unit
We exchanged the old BBO of the Cobra's FCU with a new one. The output power of the Cobra was around 120mJ. In the end, we achieved a UV power of about 21mJ. In addition, we optimized the fiber-coupling to the wavemeter. 
  53   Mon Jun 23 10:59:36 2025 Julian, Lukas, Zsolt, Nadine, KonstantinRunsScan routine
-Start new injection
->wait for 60 injections to be complete
->note down SIS intensity (at extraction)
->observe Schottky to ensure proper bunching
->check laser position (should be well-centered)
-open file, start Go4
->do '@openfile' in both mbs windows
->start acquisition (green arrow) in both Go4 instances (check indicator 'Current Ev/s' at the bottom, should be green, not red)
->start laser scan
->reset Ch3 of the particle detector (in the electronics hut)
->check laser position (disappears at start of scan then drifts through the image from the left)
-when laser scan is finished:
->stop Go4 acquisition (big red 'STOP' button in the top row)
->do '@closefile' in both mbs windows
->check counts on particle detector
-update elog
-repeat
  61   Thu Jun 26 18:13:17 2025 Jan, CarstenDetectorsPMT voltages & thresholds
current settings of PMT voltages and thresholds at the CAEN CFD:

PMT South   [HV ch2: 2700V]  [CFD ch0: 8]

PMT Middle  [HV ch1: 2850V]  [CFD ch1: 8]

PMT Nord    [HV ch3: 2850V]  [CFD ch2: 9]
  64   Thu Jun 26 22:51:04 2025 Hendrik, FinnRunsNightshift data runs
After the scan at 22:04 teh FCU new was new calibrated. For this MEdusa was stopped and reopened in the laser lab. This stops the Labview server, and as a consequence the the connection to the MBS was lsot. Then, MBS needs to be restarted and the online data is cleared. Such an intervention should avoided as good as possible.
A pratical solution for beamtimes with such long data taking is still pending.
When trying to restart MBS MBS completlz hung up also resl etc did not work. Crate powered down and restarted.

23:10 Quadrupole magnet stopped working, lost beam in ESR. Contacted on-call ESR service

Time Part. Det. Int SIS-intensity accumulations in ESR cooler-HV PTB K250 cooler-HV PTB red cooler-HV orange LMD-DAQ1 Files LMD-DAQ2 Files scan range(nm) number of positions dwell time (laser shots) n loops checked laser position mesytec rate ok comments
0:15 8000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 150 177 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
0:28 20900 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 151 178 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
0:59 19000 2.3-2.7 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 152 179 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
1:14 14500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 153 180 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
1:30 19800 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 154 181 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
1:45 18000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 155 182 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
2:01 6600 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 156 183 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
2:18 14500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 157 184 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
2:36 14700 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 158 185 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
2:45 6000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 159 186 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
3:00 5500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 160 187 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
3:17 5200 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 161 188 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
3:34 14300 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 162 189 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
3:50 17200 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 163 190 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
4:07 5000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 164 191 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
4:22 16500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 165 192 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
4:39 14000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 166 193 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
4:55 17000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 167 194 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
5:12 16500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 168 195 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
5:26 14000 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 169 196 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
5:43 13100 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 170 197 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
5:56 16500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 171 198 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits at -10 and +10, SIS intensity unstable
  66   Fri Jun 27 06:55:45 2025 Esther. KonstantinLaserLaser-ion overlap
We cross-checked the laser-ion superposition by using the T-scrapers. We did it only after the scans in order to do not change the duty cycle by much. Attachements are in the order of the measurements compiled in the table.

motorion beam position (mm) from inside
GECEDS1VU -0,5
GECEDS1HA -4
GECEDS2VU 0.9
GECEDS2VU 0


Still looks fine to us.
Attachment 1: 2025-06-27_06-52-01-807.png
2025-06-27_06-52-01-807.png
Attachment 2: 2025-06-27_07-12-27-135.png
2025-06-27_07-12-27-135.png
Attachment 3: 2025-06-27_07-32-28-599.png
2025-06-27_07-32-28-599.png
Attachment 4: 2025-06-27_07-51-52-620.png
2025-06-27_07-51-52-620.png
  Draft   Fri Jun 27 06:13:02 2025 Esther, KonstantinRunsEarly shift - data taking
Notes:
1. TE slits at -10 and +10
2. SIS intensity unstable until about 9:00 after that it became much more stable
3. brief interruption between 09:30 and 10:03 due to interlock issue at SIS

Time Part. Det. Int SIS-intensity accumulations in ESR cooler-HV PTB K250 cooler-HV PTB red cooler-HV orange LMD-DAQ1 Files LMD-DAQ2 Files scan range(nm) number of positions dwell time (laser shots) n loops checked laser position mesytec rate ok comments
06:15 16300 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 172 199 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
06:30 13500 1.5-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 173 200 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
06:44 4000 1.5-2 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 174 201 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes beam scraped vertically with scraper 1 after end of laser scan (see entry 66), scraper left in but tilted to allow for injection
07:05 14800 2-3.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 175 202 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes beam scraped horizontally with scraper 1 after end of laser scan (see entry 66), scraper 1 moved back out
07:25 14000 1.1-2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 176 203 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes beam scraped horizontally with scraper 2 after end of laser scan (see entry 66), scraper 2 left in but tilted to allow for injection
07:44 4200 1-2.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 177 204 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes beam scraped horizontally with scraper 2 after end of laser scan (see entry 66), scraper 2 moved back out
08:12 5700 1-2.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 178 205 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes !!file in DAQ1 not closed after end of scan!!; ~5 injections missing because nothing came from SIS
08:27 16000 1.5-3 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 178 206 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes !!file in DAQ1 still open from last scan!!
08:44 11700 1.5-3 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 179 207 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
09:00 15600 2.6-3 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 180 208 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
09:24 6500 2.8 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 181 209 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
10:13 14600 2.2 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 182 210 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
10:31 183 211 BAD FILES: ESR not stopped in SC9, injection during laser scan
10:39 14500 2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 184 212 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
10:55 15400 2.3 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 185 213 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
11:11 15500 2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 186 214 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
11:27 15800 2.5 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 187 215 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
11:41 5200 1.4-2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 188 216 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
11:56 16500 2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 189 217 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
12:12 15000 2.9 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 190 218 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
12:27 15000 2.8 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 191 219 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
12:44 15800 2.9 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 192 220 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
13:21 5400 2.3 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 193 221 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
13:42 4800 2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 194 222 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
13:59 6200 2.6 e9 30 104522 104526 104526 195 223 551.91 - 549.41 501 15 1 yes yes
  67   Fri Jun 27 11:21:25 2025 Esther, KonstantinDAQTiming
We cross-checked the timing. Laser pulse is detected at bins 136 (PD-North) and 171 (PD-south), respectively. Therefore, the laser puls is in the electron cooler at 153.5. The revolution period corresponds to 3e8Hz / 1.54315MHz = 194. 
The ion bunch must travel 2.5m more than the half of the circumference (108.3m). Taking this into account, the ion bunch must be detected (0.5 + 2.5 / 108.3) * 194 = 101.5 bins later (meaning less) than 153.5.
Finally, we are happy that the timing is still perfect, since the ion bunch arrives at 52. 
  18   Wed Jun 18 00:33:56 2025 Esther, Alexis, Anton, Rodolfo, CarstenDAQR4l-41
We have some issues with the RIO computer R4l-41 (DAQ1). We had to switch off completely twice. Only then it reacted properly. Maybe a problem with the network at about 00:00 o'clock?
  20   Wed Jun 18 01:58:02 2025 Esther, Alexis, Anton, Rodolfo, CarstenAcceleratorNo Bunched Beam
The Bunching is not set properly. We do not see the ion bunch with the Photomultiplier.
Attachment 1: Bildschirmfoto_PD_PMTSouth_2025-06-18_1.png
Bildschirmfoto_PD_PMTSouth_2025-06-18_1.png
  71   Sat Jun 28 15:28:22 2025 Carsten., Uwe RunsRuns with new scan range
22:10 SIS Trafo GS09DT scale was changed to 4e8 (not just the lassie monitor)
23:50 Ausfall ESR: GE01 KP01 bis KP05 und KP22 bis KP24; Korrekturelement: GE02KX6 und GE01KX2; beam loss during measurement
01:45 reser press air Scrapers: GE02DD2_G (sc8,11); GE02DS03HG(sc7,8,11); GE01DD2IG(was sc7,10,11)(now7,8,11)
Time Part. Det. Int SIS-intensity accumulations in ESR cooler-HV PTB K250 cooler-HV PTB red cooler-HV orange LMD-DAQ1 Files LMD-DAQ2 Files scan range(nm) number of positions dwell time (laser shots) n loops checked laser position mesytec rate ok TE slits comments
15:25 >20000 2.5e9 30 - - - 260 234 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 detector started too late
15:52 15200 2.5e9 30 - - - 261 235 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 SIS injection fluctuating
16:09 6000 3.3e9 30 - - - 262 236 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 accumulation curve in ESR much flatter
16:31 5800 3.0e9 30 - - - 264 237 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 data not in online DAN; lmd-file: DAQ2_0263.lmd is empty
16:47 10000 3.0e9 30 - - - 265 238 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 okay
17:10 15500 3.0e9 35 - - - 266 239 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 okay
17:45 16000 3.2e9 35 - - - 267 240 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -7 +7 okay
18:11 4800 3.0e9 40 - - - 268 241 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -6 +6 data not in online DAN
19:00 4650 3.0e9 40 - - - 269 242 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -9 +5.5 SIS ions low for first 8 to 10 injections
19:40 14900 3.0e9 40 - - - 270 243 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -9 +5.5 3-5 empty shots during filling
19:56 14800 2.5e9 40 - - - 271 244 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -9 +5.5 3-5 empty shots during filling
20:10 5600 2.3e9 40 - - - 272 245 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -9 +5.5 3-5 empty shots during filling; SIS -> ESR injections 1-3x10**-9 particles variation; accelerator stopped after half filling of ESR; took data for measurement
21:55 14300 2.5e9 35 - - - 273 246 550.610 - 548.110 501 15 1 yes yes TE slits -9 +5.5




17:11 HHT access
17:20 beam back, but problems with SIS intensity
17:35 intensity good, again. 3x10**9 particles in SIS |-
18:30 SIS intensity dropped to 1x10**8 particles
18:45 SIS intensity recovered to 3.75x10**9 particles

Starting from 18:45 slits are set asymmetric:
The dipole magnet TE4MU1 which is in front of our TE slit pair turns to the right. Thus, lower momentum ions are also on the right side. 229Pa89+ has a higher Z=91 than 229Th89+ (Z=90).
Therefore, in the thick target Z=91 , Pa looses more energy than 229Th. With the asymmetric setting we try to further minimize Pa contaminants.
20:05 HHT access
20:15 SIS dipol failure; 1-2h no beam expected; on-call-technical-service is informed
21:10 beam is back. SIS dipole / power supply a fuse needed to be exchanged; we leave the beam for 30min to FRS exclusively
21:35 start taking data again
  13   Mon Jun 16 21:47:23 2025 Carsten, Wilfried, Simon DetectorsNew threshold values for PMTs
We adjusted the thresholds for the PMTs and increased the voltage of PMT middle to 2.7kV

PMT Model Operation Voltage Threshold (mV)
South ET9422B Broadband -1750 V 30
Middle ET9423B Smallband -2700 V 18
North ET9423B Smallband -2650 V 10
  57   Tue Jun 24 17:39:13 2025 Carsten, Stefan, Simon, Rima, NilsDetectorsPMT behaviour - noise / PMT voltages / CFD Threshholds / CAEN Power supply (broken channel resetted)
PMT North and South have been changed:

CFD CH0: Middle Thr 7 / CAEN HV Ch1: 2750 V
CFD CH1: South Thr 8 / CAEN HV Ch2: 2700 V
CFD CH2: North Thr 8 / CAEN HV CH3: 2800 V

MESY CFD Ch4: Thr.17
MESY CFD Ch5: Thr.16
MESY CFD Ch6: Thr.20


Quote:
In position North there is still the "old" 9423B PMT that draws quite some current.
On this detector threre is also some quite substantial noise. Very likely the base is not ok any more. Noise was much lesss for the other two PMTs.
Since position NORTH is the position with the largest sold angle, if there is another break from the accelerator we should exchange it against SOUTH.
It was also difficult to ramp up PMT north ; and I thought that againa channel broke (showing UnV not OVC (Overcurrent)). However, the PS is resetted if
you switch of the whole crate (aka switch the PS off). Before doing so, please ramp down the other channels slowly as intended.


Please leave the PMTs (besides you go in to exhchange the PMTs).
If you ramp pt PMT North (or the same detector at a different position), start with 2400 V and then slowly increase by steps of 50V.

Checked theresholds (but during injections, so in presence of electronic noise from injection). A further adjusted might be done later when we have measurement conditions.
(Or if we have time to exchange the PMTs).


Presently we have the following settings for CAEN:


CH1: Middle 2750 V, Thr 9
CH2: South 2700 V, Thr 7
CH3: North 2800 V, Thr 9
  14   Mon Jun 16 22:27:01 2025 Carsten, SimonDAQThresholds
We also adjusted the thresholds for the mesytic.
Doing that, we noticed that one of the trafos is broken (5th row, middle).

PMT channel Threshold
South 5 35
Middle 6 16
North 7 16
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b