ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Year |
Text |
 |
|
Draft
|
Tue Apr 21 22:25:00 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | | | |
|
|
274
|
Wed Apr 8 23:02:24 2020 |
Laszlo | General | lmd to measurement pairing list | | I use the following list of lmd files combined
to a single root file for each measurement.
It is very important to highlight that sometimes |
|
|
273
|
Wed Apr 8 20:06:10 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | Counts in the K-REC peaks | | 3 datasets were investigated:
-124Xe with Scraper (2. Xray calibration
parameters needed)
|
|
|
272
|
Mon Apr 6 23:00:51 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | beam energies for 124Xe and 118Te measurements | | "The e- cooler settings were the same for
the 124Xe and 118Te beams" - Sergey --> speed
of the ions is the same --> same MeV/u
|
|
|
271
|
Mon Apr 6 04:39:19 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | 2. Xray energy calibration | | 30angle: E[keV] = 0.015898 *ch-1.91
90angle: E[keV] = 0.0211075*ch-2.39
145angle: E[keV] = 0.01663 *ch-1.758 |
9x |
|
270
|
Sun Apr 5 20:34:42 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | Xray energies - 1. calibration | | 30angle: E[keV] = 0.0158507 *ch-2.07456
90angle: E[keV] = 0.01950*ch-2.76
145angle: E[keV] = 0.017988 *ch-1.809
|
8x |
|
269
|
Thu Mar 26 12:05:22 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | measurement of collimators | | The measurements were taken by using a caliper
ruler, with precision of +/-0.05mm |
|
|
268
|
Wed Mar 25 15:06:09 2020 |
Laszlo | Analysis | quick summary of the run numbers | | |
|
|
267
|
Wed Mar 25 14:26:22 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run111 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 167.5mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 90
Source: 241Am
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
266
|
Tue Mar 24 10:59:18 2020 |
Jan | Calibration | Sources - Specifications | | We used the following sources:
[B]Am241[/B] (OM666) [GSI - Uwe]
|
|
|
265
|
Tue Mar 24 10:20:26 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | Pictures of the xray calibration | | |
|
|
264
|
Tue Mar 24 00:11:35 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run116 - Xray35 calib AM241, distance 334mm | | Detector: 35
Source: 241Am
Distance: 334mm
|
|
|
263
|
Mon Mar 23 22:25:41 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run115 - Xray35 Ba133 d=334mm, Xray90 Lead source, d=167.5mm | | Simultaneous measurement of Xray35 and Xray90.
The dead-time is <3%
|
|
|
262
|
Mon Mar 23 21:47:40 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run114 - Xray145 calib Ba133, distance 305mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 145
Source: 133Ba - strong source
Distance: 305mm
|
|
|
261
|
Mon Mar 23 20:52:37 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run113 - Xray145 calib Am241, distance 305mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 145
Source: 241Am
Distance: 305mm
|
|
|
260
|
Mon Mar 23 19:32:53 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run112 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 200mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 90
Source: 241Am
Distance: 200mm
|
|
|
259
|
Mon Mar 23 18:17:27 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run110 - Xray90 calib Ba133, distance 167.5mm -low rate - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 90
Source: Ba133 - weak source
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
258
|
Mon Mar 23 18:15:55 2020 |
Laszlo | General | noisy 90degree Xray det | | Uwe found out, that there was some common
ground effect between 90 and 145 degree detectors.
after moving the grounds, we could record |
|
|
257
|
Mon Mar 23 17:40:33 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run109 - Xray90 calib Ba133, distance 167.5mm -low rate | | Detector: 90
Source: Ba133 - weak source
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
256
|
Mon Mar 23 17:32:42 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run108 - Xray90 calib Ba133, distance 167.5mm - high rate - deadtime too high! | | Detector: 90
Source: Ba133 - strong source
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|