 Mon Mar 23 12:30:39 2020, laszlo, Analysis, with and without scraper, 
|
| |
|
Thu May 27 12:41:25 2021, Yuri, Jan, Runs, Run 0152, 2021
|
No. of stacks: 10
length SC10: 2x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
Thu May 27 13:24:29 2021, Yuri, Jan, Runs, Run 0153, 2021
|
All runs before (since 13:40 26/05/21) were taken without the degrader in FRS!
|
|
Thu May 27 14:38:14 2021, Yuri, Jan, Runs, Run 0155, 2021
|
No. of stacks: 10
length SC10: 2x 5.5s
|
|
Thu May 27 11:36:23 2021, Yuri, Beatriz, Jan, Runs, Run 0151, 2021
|
Power supplies for correction coils were in failure.
No effect seen in schottky after reset and repower, however.
|
|
Thu May 27 08:23:05 2021, Yuri, Beatriz, Runs, Run 0148, 2021
|
No. of stacks: 20
length SC10: 3x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
Thu May 27 08:26:15 2021, Yuri, Beatriz, General, Optimisation beam position on target and scraper position, 2021
|
Optimised overlap with the target by shifting the beam from -11.5 to 12.8 mm. This lead to an increase of the DSSSD rate of a factor between 2.5 or 3.
Adjusted scraper position by looking at x-ray rate and move it from +1 to +2. |
|
Thu May 27 09:39:15 2021, Yuri, Beatriz, Runs, Run 0149, 2021
|
No. of stacks: 20
length SC10: 3x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
Thu May 27 10:21:41 2021, Yuri, Beatriz, Runs, Run 0150, 2021
|
No. of stacks: 10
length SC10: 2x 5.5s
bump ge01sq2f (sc10): -20 mm
|
|
Wed May 19 19:47:14 2021, Yuri, General, Beam Halflife at 30 AMeV, 2021
|
| |
|
Mon Jul 8 14:57:07 2019, Yuanming Xing, Detectors, The measurement of the tilting angle,
|
As shown in the figure, the detector is tilted by a certain angle which is about 45 degree.
The tilted angle is defined as angle B.
We measured angle A using the vertical laser line (red) and papers with a straight line edge. So we can marked
|
|
Tue Jul 9 15:26:59 2019, Yuanming Xing, Simulations, Simulated Rutherford scattering distribution on detector,
|
Simulated Rutherford scattering distribution on detector
Beam: 111Sn
|
|
Sat May 29 13:43:39 2021, Tino, Rene, Yuri, Laszlo, Markus, Runs, change of settings, 2021
|
from now on, everal beam setting will be different. We could not get the beam back to were it was before. When the scraper was pulled back by 2 cm, the
loe/energy beam was visible again via cap.
Schottky. However, no x-rays could be observerved during the target-on phase.
|
|
Sat Mar 21 03:01:22 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run051,
|
Open file: runstart051
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
Sat Mar 21 03:03:53 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run052,
|
Open file: runstart052
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
Sat Mar 21 03:30:21 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run052,
|
Open file: runstart052
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
Sat Mar 21 03:58:56 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run053,
|
Open file: runstart053
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
Sat Mar 21 04:29:59 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run053,
|
Open file: runstart053
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
Sat Mar 21 05:01:09 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run054,
|
Open file: runstart054
beam: 118Te52+
|
|
Sat Mar 21 05:29:17 2020, Tino, Oliver, Runs, run entry - run054,
|
Open file: runstart054
beam: 118Te52+
|
|