Fri Apr 8 14:12:57 2022, morning shift, DAQ, timing for h=1
|
The timing for h=1 has been set up
The time window is now twice as large as before!
This means that we see the same ion bunch twice.
(150 bins = 1 turn in the ESR)
The PMT signal is exactly in between two cycles + the extra flight time (3 bins = 10 ns) from target to PMT north. |
Sat Apr 2 01:27:25 2022, Jan Glorius, Runs, test runs 02.04.2022
|
Beam settings:
primary beam
copper stripper
I_el=300mA
U_el=205.490kV (Ohm_labs)
3.5e7 ions at injection
MSCF/ADC settings:
ch2 < Mid PMT x10
ch6 < Mid PMT x100
see attachment (setting_e142....) for detailed MSCF settings
Files/Runs [DAQ2]:
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0022.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
no corresponding file in DAQ1
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0023.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5
file in DAQ1:
...7768.lmd
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0024.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: out (-127)
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5
file in DAQ1:
...7770.lmd
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0025.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan not:
VUPROM -> delay stop trigger ch12
file in DAQ1:
no file
no laser scan
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0026.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5
VUPROM -> delay stop trigger ch12
file in DAQ1:
...7772.lmd |
Wed Apr 6 18:51:33 2022, Danyal & Carsten, Accelerator, target bump
|
This afternoon, we found out that Sergey has also implemented a "target bump".
Although we do not use a target, this bump is still convenient because
we can move the ion beam such that is passes perfectly through the Cu mirror.
The setting is -8 mm and 1.3 mrad (if I am not mistaken)
We tested the effect on the position of the ion beam using the
horizontal scrapers at the target: GEEXDS1HA and GEEXDS2HA.
With the target bump set to "zero" (0 mm and 0 mrad),
the ion beam passed 6-8 mm to the outside.
This way, it will e.g. not pass centrally through the slit in the Cu mirror.
With the target bump set to -8 mm and 1.3 mrad, which is the default setting, the ion beam passed centrally.
Therefore, we left the target bump like this. |
Wed Apr 6 08:06:02 2022, Danyal, DAQ, stopped NTCAP data acquisition
|
I stopped the NTCAP data acquisition at 8 AM.
Let's hope that the file contains good data. |
Sun Apr 10 06:39:16 2022, Kristian, Marek, Max, Runs, runs morning shift 10.04.
|
These are the measurement runs of the morning shift (10.04.).
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
06:xx | 3e8 | 2096xx | 0141-0141 | 7876-7876 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | just one loop
|
06:39 | 2e9 | 209621 | 0142-0142 | 7877-7877 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
07:18 | 2.1e9 | 209616 | 0143-0143 | 7878-7878 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | 8000 particles on counter
|
07:57 | 2.2e9 | 209621 | 0144-0144 | 7879-7879 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
08:37 | 1.9e9 | 209620 | 0145-0145 | 7880-7880 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | 7200 particles on counter
|
09:24 | 2.1e9 | 209621 | 0146-0146 | 7881-7881 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | laser pulse energy @ start of run: 488mJ green monitor, 11.6mJ UV, 7700 particles on counte
|
10:07 | 2.1e9 | 209620 | 0147-0147 | 7882-7882 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | optimized WM coupling, the WM data is stretched in this run (buffer problem?), also possible for previous runs
|
11:04 | 2.1e9 | 209620 | 0148-0148 | 7884-7884 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | restarted WM, still wrong WM data, stopped after 1 run
|
11:27 | 2.1e9 | 209616 | 0149-0149 | 7885-7885 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | restarted WM + LV
|
12:11 | 2.0e9 | 209616 | 0150-0150 | 7886-7886 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | wrong WM data
|
12:55 | 1.9e9 | 209616 | 0151-0151 | 7887-7887 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | changed LV code (ID: 198), WM data works now!
|
13:37 | 1.8e9 | 209620 | 0152-0152 | 7888-7888 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
14:16 | 2.1e9 | 209621 | 0153-0153 | 7889-7889 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | 1 loop |
Thu Apr 7 14:04:36 2022, Paul Indelicato, General, no beam until 17:00
|
10:10 There is a problem with the UNILAC.
The repair will take several hours. (4 hrs?)
14:00 We just enquired about the status and when beam could be back.
The current estimate is 17:00.
More work on laser aligment is required.
Estimated time: 1 hour |
Tue Apr 12 12:41:20 2022, Alexandre, Sebastian, Accelerator, no beam in SIS18
|
|
Mon Apr 11 10:31:07 2022, Kristian, Sebastian, Alexandre, Danyal, Paul, General, new laser wavelength scan range 322.41 - 322.00 nm
|
new wavelength scan range is 322.41 - 322.00 nm
at 10:31
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | particles counted | comments
|
10:31 | 1.75e9 | 209617 | 0180 | 7915 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 2300 | ABORT ... no laser ... beam stabilization was off |
|
10:40 | xxe9 | 209617 | 0181 | 7916 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | xxx | ABORT ... laser did not start from 322.41 nm |
|
10:42 | xxe9 | 209615 | 0182 | 7917 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | xxx | ABORT ... laser did not start from 322.41 nm |
|
10:45 | 2.1e9 | 209616 | 0183 | 7918 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 9236 | HV E-cooler fluctuates slowly over 3 V |
|
11:22 | 1.7e9 | 209616 | 0184 | 7919 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | xxx | |
|
12:02 | 2.0e9 | 209616 | 0185 | 7920 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 9660 | |
|
12:43 | 1.8e9 | 209618 | 0186 | 7921 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 6533 | HV E-cooler jump to ~209700k for ~10 seconds and than back to 209618 |
|
13:24 | 2.0e9 | 209617 | 0187 | 7922 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 9500 | |
|
14:05 | 2.0e9 | 209618 | 0188 | 7923 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 9220 | |
|
|
|
Tue Apr 12 21:56:54 2022, Volker, David, Pierre-Michel & Danyal, Alexandre, Sebastian, General, new laser wavelength scan range 321.62 - 321.10 nm
|
New wavelength scan range is 321.62 - 321.10 nm. Before the new scan range (compare old scan range in Entry 215) was applied,
the cooler settings were slightly modified. Current was changed from 50 mA to 40 mA, correction voltage was changed from 3943 V to 3948 V. Additionally, the positions
of scraper NA was changed from -10 mm to -8 mm and scraper NI from +10 mm to +8 mm.
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | particles counted | comments
|
21:57 | 1.55e9 | 209621 | 0226-0227 | 7962 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 7835 |
|
22:54 | 1.4e9 | 209612 | 0228 | 7963 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 3326 | PMT south voltage reduced to 2400 V before run, Threshold now 80, Cooler Voltage changed to 209628 V at 23:19
|
23:45 | 2.0e9 | 209628 | 0229-0230 | 7964 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8560 |
|
00:34 | 1.7e9 | 209626 | 0231 | 7965 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 7169 |
|
01:29 | 1.1e9 | 209624 | 0232 | 7966 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 6412 |
|
02:19 | 1.75e9 | 209626 | 0233 | 7967 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 7590 |
|
03:06 | 1.6e9 | 209630 | 0234 | 7968 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 6329 |
|
03:58 | 1.7e9 | 209629 | 0235-0236 | 7969 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 7710 |
|
04:43 | 1.8e9 | 209629 | 0237 | 7970 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | | Electron cooler went red @04:48
|
05:48 | 1.5e9 | 209623 | 0238 | 7971 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 9420 |
|
06:42 | 1.6e9 | 209616 | 0239 | 7972 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8250 |
|
07:32 | 1.7e9 | 209621 | 0240 | 7974 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8840 | file 7943 was started accidentally too early and killed
|
08:22 | 1.85e9 | 209622 | 0241 | 7975 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | | ABORTED: laser did not start scanning
|
08:33 | 1.90e9 | 209624 | 0242-243 | 7976 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 9955 |
|
09:23 | 1.7e9 | 209624 | 0244-0245 | 7977 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 9021 | 09:50 Ecooler 12V drop for a few seconds; 9:52 again 12V E-cooler drop
|
10:12 | 1.85e9 | 20962x | 0246 | 7978 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8067 |
|
11:10 | 1.7e9 | 209615 | 0247-248 | 7979 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8905 |
|
11:59 | 1.94e9 | 209612 | 0249-0250 | 7980 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8203 | drop in E-cooler voltage of 8V at about 12:16 (before there was a slow increase from .612 to .620)
|
12:48 | 2.0e9 | 209612 | 0251-0252 | 7981 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8018 | E-cooler is not very stable (varies between .604 and .613) ; ~13:18 E-Cooler 18V jump to 209622V
|
13:36 | 1.7e9 | 209621 | 0253 | 7982 | 321.62 - 321.10 | 0.002 | 5s | 8170 |
|
|
|
Thu Apr 7 14:13:27 2022, Danyal, Detectors, new PMT south
|
I have replaced the PMT south (looks at the gas target).
in the hope that this will produce less dark counts.
Thus far, the dark countrate is low (few Hz).
brand: ET enterprises
type: 2" photomultiplier, 9423B
High voltage: -2.45 kV (up to -3.5 kV)
spectral range: 110 - 230 nm
The power comes from an additional 2.5 kV supply.
(I have changed the cable: was CH0 before) |
Sat Apr 9 06:25:22 2022, Max, Kristian, Runs, morning shift runs
|
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th
Shottky marker pos: 243.973MHz
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
xx:xx | x.xe9 | 209xxx | 00xx | 78xx | 32x.x - 32x.x | 0.01 | x | sketch for filling the table
|
06:40 | 1.7e9 | 209619 | 0098-0099 | 7836 | 323.2 - 321.2 | 0.002 | 4s | laser pulse energy is @ ~12mJ after SHG
|
09:35 | 1.4e9 | 209624 | 0101-0101 | 7838-7838 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | only 0.5nm range, WM power + coupling tuned to scan range, Konstantin updated LV code to hold Cobra Set WL value, aborted LV readout problem
|
11:25 | 1.0e9 | 209622 | 0102 - 102 | 7839-7839 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | LV readout problem solved. WM readout is wrong (Cobra set is good)
|
12:15 | old beam | 209622 | 0103 - 103 | 7840-7840 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | WM readout is wrong
|
12:50 | 2.3e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 104 | 7841-7841 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | couldnt open go4 stream view, stopped after one good scan
|
13:20 | 2.0e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 105 | 7842-7842 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | first scan with LV correct
|
|
Fri Aug 6 10:40:54 2021, Rodolfo, DAQ, mbs in atplaser
|
The "MBS program" (data acquisition) is now located within atplaser@r4l-41, in the folder "th21":
R4L-41 atplaser > pwd
/esr/usr/atplaser/mbsrun/th21
R4L-41 atplaser > ls -l
total 412
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 3326 Jul 21 13:42 #Makefile#
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 18675 Jul 19 10:43 #f_user.c.lc21wlv#
-rwxr--r-- 1 atplaser esr 3324 Jul 21 13:17 Makefile
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 2803 Jul 13 10:59 Makefile.lynx
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 3324 Jul 13 10:59 Makefile.test
drwxr-xr-x 2 atplaser esr 4096 Jul 13 10:59 dump
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 8032 Aug 2 13:06 f_user.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 18673 Jul 14 10:39 f_user.c.lc21wlv
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 6368 Jul 21 11:01 f_user.c.lynx
-rwxr--r-- 1 atplaser esr 18843 Jul 23 11:09 f_user_wlvc.c
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 49 Jul 13 10:59 filenum.set
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 8181 Jul 13 10:59 include
-rwxr-xr-x 1 atplaser esr 162908 Aug 2 13:07 m_read_meb
-rw-rw-rw- 1 atplaser esr 81056 Aug 5 19:07 mbslog.l
drwxr-xr-x 2 atplaser esr 4096 Jul 13 10:59 scom
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 13154 Jul 13 10:59 setup.usf
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 94 Jul 13 10:59 shutdown.scom
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 320 Jul 13 10:59 st.scom
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 290 Jul 22 15:23 startup.scom
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 525 Jul 13 10:59 startup.scom.lynx
drwxr-xr-x 2 atplaser esr 4096 Jul 13 10:59 suha
-rw-r--r-- 1 atplaser esr 18999 Jul 13 10:59 vuprom_tdc_v5.h
Note: This MBS-Version was used previously by Sebastian in "laser cooling 21". |
Thu Apr 14 06:29:18 2022, Max, Sebastian, Accelerator, lesser ESR injection intensity
|
We now have less ESR injection intensity (see screenshot attached).
This can also be seen in the count rate after "UNILAC/SIS failures".
Before failure: ~7k-8k
Now: 3k
The stored particles in the SIS are only in the range between 1.4 and 1.7e9 |
Fri Apr 15 12:42:18 2022, Max, Danyal, Carsten, Konstantin, Patrick, Simon, General, laser wavelength range changed: 320.12 - 319.60 nm
|
Runs of the morning/afternoon/night shift. The wavelength range is now 320.12 - 319.60 nm.
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | particles counted | comments
|
12:51 | 1.2e9 | 209617 | 0321 | 8034 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 5530 | ERS Trafo 1.25e7 --> 1.2e9
|
13:43 | 1.2e9 | 209617 | 0322 | 8035 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6408 | at 13:49 there was a short broadening of the ion beam in the Schottky spectrum
|
14:35 | 1.16e9 | 209618 | 0323 | 8036 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6585 |
|
15:30 | 1.08e9 | 209617 | 0324 | 8037 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 5701 |
|
16:20 | 1.10e9 | 209617 | 0325 | 8038 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 5470 |
|
17:11 | 1.11e9 | 209617 | 0326 | 8039 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 5519 |
|
18:00 | 1.08e9 | 209616 | 0327 | 8040 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 5402 | Ecooler voltage suddenly jumped to 109619 around 18:30. Laser spot seems to drift slowly to an inner position (left on the screen). This might be due to an interplay between a decreasing laser power and the position sensitive detectors of the beam stabilization.
|
18:52 | 1.16e9 | 209620 | 0328 | 8041 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6948 |
|
20:39 | 1.13e9 | 209619 | 0329 | 8042 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6xxx | Dye was changed before this run was started
|
20:32 | 1.20e9 | 209620 | 0330 | 8043 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6948 |
|
22:25 | 1.21e9 | 209619 | 0331 | 8044 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7120 | Night shift took over (Patrick, Simon)
|
23:15 | 1.26e9 | 209619 | 0332 | 8045 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7080 |
|
00:06 | 1.25e9 | 209616 | 0333 | 8046 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6500 |
|
00:59 | 1.23e9 | 209616 | 0334 | 8047 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 5380 |
|
01:50 | 1.30e9 | 209616 | 0335 | 8048 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6750 |
|
02:41 | 1.38e9 | 209616 | 0336 | 8049 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6970 |
|
03:32 | 1.37e9 | 209616 | 0337 | 8050 | 320.12 - 319.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7010 |
|
|
Fri Apr 8 14:43:50 2022, Wilfried, DAQ, laser timing - Q-switch start
|
below are my notes concerning laser timing / Q-switch start |
Fri Apr 8 14:46:02 2022, Danyal & Sebastian & Volker & Ken, Detectors, high dark countrate Cu PMT solved
|
The problem - "discovered" by Volker and Ken - of the high dark countrate of the Cu PMT has been solved.
(when the Cu mirror was moved in, the dark countrate was very high ... also without ion beam)
I asked Graziano Savino to check the vacuum gauges along the target side of the ESR (west side).
The gauges at the laser window sections (which we do not use here!) - NW and SW - were still on.
Volker remembered that, in the past, for the lowest dark countrate at the Cu PMT --> ALL GAUGES MUST BE SWITCHED OFF.
Graziano turned them off and Sebastian and I checked the Cu PMT rate in DAQ1.
Attached you can clearly see the difference: from 7500 cps to 400 cps.
When the Cu mirror is retracted the dark countrate is 200 cps.
Danyal
PS The slow increase in one plot is due to the fact that Graziano switched on the light in the ESR. |
Sun Apr 10 04:07:53 2022, Patrick, DAQ, go4 shows wrong frequencies and wavelengths
|
Update (ID:194): In labview "Stop All", close labview, stop python script (ID:197), close wavemeter. Then restart wavemeter, python script, labview an mbs.
Both labview and the wavemeter software are displaying the scanned wavelength correctly (Fig. 1 & 2), but go4 shows something which looks just like a freely drifting wavelength (Fig. 3).
The Cobra set voltages are displayed correctly. |
Sat Apr 9 13:45:42 2022, Max, Kristian, Runs, first scans with LV problem solved!
|
This is the first time with LV buffer problem solved (see Elog ID: 184). Before the PMT signals were out of sync with the wavelength data!
We concluded to scan with step sizes of 0.002nm, scan range of 0.5nm (f
nm), dwelltime = 150(5s), loops = 2 (approx.: 30min measurements).
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th
Shottky marker pos: 243.973MHz
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
11:25 | 1.0e9 | 209622 | 0102 - 102 | 7839-7839 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | LV readout problem solved. WM readout is wrong (Cobra set is good)
|
12:15 | old beam | 209622 | 0103 - 103 | 7840-7840 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | WM readout is wrong
|
12:50 | 2.3e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 104 | 7841-7841 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | couldnt open go4 stream view, stopped after one good scan, WM readout is wrong .
|
13:20 | 2.0e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 105 | 7842-7842 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | first scan with LV correct
|
13:40 | 1.2e9 | 209618 | 0106 - 106 | 7843-7843 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | 3 loops
|
14:20 | 1.5e9 | 209612 | 0107 - 107 | 7844-7844 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | 1 loop
|
Runs after this have the right cobra set value but propably the wrong WM data until 10.04.22 12:44 (see also ID:198) |
Fri Apr 8 15:39:36 2022, all, Runs, first data after timing set up
|
started taking data again
started at 15:40
h=1
file names
229Th7821 DAQ 1 607 MB
229Th0082 DAQ 2 820 MB
stopped at 16:25
The laser was not really properly scanned.
This was mainly a test run to see if everything was working. |
Thu Apr 7 11:11:31 2022, Max, Sebastian, Laser, dye changed, pulse energy measurements
|
We changed the dye at 10am.
We increased the pump power for the dye Laser to 480mJ (before 450mJ). New calibration factor is 29 for Quanta Ray monitor signal.
We get now 17mJ UV pulse energy after SHG. Pulse energy before was 14mJ. |
|
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b |