| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
4
|
Tue May 4 17:54:08 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | updated LISE file | This file really has the optics like used
in the last ESR experiments.
Now the transmission is also a little bit |
|
|
5
|
Tue May 4 18:25:31 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | cutting of primary beam | The slits at TE4 and TE5 can be used to cut
away the unwanted 78Kr beam (see pictures).
We do not want activation of the beamline. |
|
|
6
|
Tue May 4 21:49:04 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | cut Brho by scrapers | The dispersion from the production target
into the ESR is not matched.
This is not good for momentum acceptance, |
|
|
8
|
Thu May 6 00:32:57 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | GICOSY file for TE beamline and ESR | This file has several options:
start in SIS, at TE3UF target or inside ESR,
choose with GOTO LABEL (G L)after start system |
|
|
9
|
Thu May 6 13:26:56 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Detectors | TE5 profile grids do not work | There are several issues.
1. The stepper motor drive does not react |
|
|
10
|
Thu May 6 14:28:32 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Calibration | Be target thickness calibration -> 1839 mg/cm^2 | Injection was optimized before with Cu-40
mg/cm^2 stripper.
This reduces energy of 78Kr from 370 MeV/u |
|
|
21
|
Fri May 7 01:07:27 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Analysis | maybe frequency ID | We think we see the frequency range of A/q=2.25
at 243.1 MHz.
This would correspond to L=108.2m and E=386.4 |
|
|
27
|
Fri May 7 03:44:55 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Accelerator | scraper optimisation | Opened TE4 slits again to +/-10mm.
Then we tried different scrapers:
|
|
|
64
|
Sat May 8 01:33:25 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | frequency list for 70Se setting | EXCEL table with all possible fragments injected
into ESR.
The path length in ESR, gamma_t and harmonic |
|
|
65
|
Sat May 8 01:43:23 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Accelerator | 70Se setting | If gamma_t = 1.3955 Tm stays, we will need
Brho = 6.21902 Tm for 70Se.
The corresponding ESR Brho setting will be |
|
|
76
|
Sat May 8 16:08:58 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Accelerator | beam position of Kr before ESR | Checked beam positions in beamline before
ESR,
they all look the same as before, with direct |
|
|
134
|
Thu Jun 24 22:05:11 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Accelerator | LISE files for 72Ge, 70Se, 52Mn settings | This is just a Brho selection by the ESR based
on SIS-energy used,
energy-loss in target with calibrated thickness |
|
|
18
|
Thu May 6 21:45:30 2021 |
Helmut | Detectors | beam position on TE5 grids | The two grids do not work very well, one x
position is opposite to the other.
But at least a guidance for the future, this |
|
|
19
|
Thu May 6 22:05:30 2021 |
Helmut | Accelerator | Beamline and ESR data sets for 72Ge setting | parammodi exports, E-SIS = 441.0 MeV/u with
Be-1840 mg/cm² target in, isoc. ESR, at least
we see fragments |
|
|
118
|
Sun May 9 23:32:24 2021 |
Helmut | Accelerator | parammodi saves | Here are parammodi saves for TE-line and ESR
for all four fragment settings:
For the first run of 72Ge (7.May) I do not |
8x |
|
198
|
Fri Jul 2 05:08:16 2021 |
Guy Leckenby (Canadian beaver team) | Analysis | e143_analyser.py Summing Script | I've written two scripts that others might
find useful for the on-line analysis.
1. The first is a simple bash script that |
|
|
34
|
Fri May 7 07:02:33 2021 |
Guy Leckenby | Analysis | Online Monitoring Plots | In compliment to Liliana's plots, this is
the summed spectra I calculated from 0338
to 0507. |
|
|
108
|
Sun May 9 17:39:21 2021 |
Guy | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 7th 19h vs 8th 21h | Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed
11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see
the evolution of the potential isomer across |
|
|
207
|
Fri Jul 2 12:42:54 2021 |
Gregor | Analysis | Spectra 6:00-12:00 | 0.1s time slices for 245MHz and 410MHz, with
e143_analyzer.py script
|
12x |
|
234
|
Sat Jul 3 08:12:22 2021 |
Dima, Yuri | General | Beam stop | We stopped the beam at 08:10
The latest recorded tdms files:
|
|