ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
|
133
|
Mon May 10 08:49:01 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, RuiJiu | General | End of the measurement | The beam was stopped at about 08:40. |
|
166
|
Thu Jul 1 07:28:55 2021 |
Jan, Akash | Accelerator | Beam intensity | Intensity went up from 5e8 to 1e9 extracted
particles from SIS. |
|
1
|
Fri Apr 23 13:47:55 2021 |
Jan Glorius | Collaboration | experiment proposal | |
|
87
|
Sun May 9 02:19:04 2021 |
Jacobus, Shahab | Runs | First 52Mn run | Run E143-245 MHz-2021.05.09.01.17.42.265.tiq
is the first run of the experiment on 52Mn. |
|
88
|
Sun May 9 02:32:58 2021 |
Jacobus, Shahab | Runs | possible 52-Mn isomer | the intensity of the line on the left side
is so high, it is difficult to see the isomers
in the middle as can be seen in the auto |
|
89
|
Sun May 9 02:45:50 2021 |
Jacobus, Michele, Shahab | Runs | Example of possible 52.Mn isomer | this is how it should look like |
|
171
|
Thu Jul 1 17:01:43 2021 |
Jacobus | Runs | Frequency shift | > The freqency suddenly shifted at time 16:11:47
and remained shifted until now
>
|
|
96
|
Sun May 9 05:56:29 2021 |
Iris, Chris G., Jacobus, Michele | Analysis | Not_52Mn spectra added up | Attached is a summed spectra of all files
taken between 1:17am and 1:59am (on the 245
MHz detector).
|
|
98
|
Sun May 9 06:15:09 2021 |
Iris, Chris G., Jacobus, Michele | Runs | Triplet: zoom in | Zoom into the triplet: the satellite peaks
on the right are clearly visible.
This is just one file but one *might* see |
|
99
|
Sun May 9 06:34:37 2021 |
Iris, Chris G., Jacobus, Michele | Analysis | Runs 2-3am Not_Mn52 | Summed up runs on the 245 MHz detector between
2-3am (computer time).
One has -s 0.1 -t 8.0
|
|
100
|
Sun May 9 06:53:20 2021 |
Iris, Chris G., Jacobus, Michele | General | Summary night shift | The tune last night was unfortunately not
to 52Mn. The two "isomers" that were identified
are instead 45Sc and 75Br. But separation |
|
101
|
Sun May 9 07:16:47 2021 |
Iris, Chris G., Jacobus, Michele | Analysis | Runs 3-4am Not_Mn52 | Summed up runs on the 245 MHz detector between
3-4am (computer time).
-s 0.1 -t 8.0 |
|
94
|
Sun May 9 05:38:29 2021 |
Iris, Chris G. | Analysis | offset btw png and tiq files from server? | This might have been answered before but I
looked at one png file and one tiq file from
the same run that was stored on the server. |
|
91
|
Sun May 9 03:24:12 2021 |
Iris (Shahab, Jacobus, Chris G., Michele) | Runs | Example of possible 52.Mn isomer | Short update from Yuri: these are not our
isomers. These are 45Sc (left, 12 keV isomer
not resolvable) and 75Br (center), and the |
|
93
|
Sun May 9 05:11:55 2021 |
Iris (Chris G., Jacobus, Michele) | Runs | First 52Mn run (no 52Mn unfortunately) | > Run E143-245 MHz-2021.05.09.01.17.42.265.tiq
is the first run of the experiment on 52Mn.
|
|
127
|
Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz | > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I
analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25
ms to see the evolution of the potential |
|
128
|
Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
|
8x |
130
|
Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector.
Peak visible.
|
9x |
132
|
Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz | Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.
|
9x |
90
|
Sun May 9 02:51:44 2021 |
Iris | Runs | Example of possible 52.Mn isomer | So the "isomers" pop up at ~-600 Hz and +580
Hz... is the -600 Hz on the left the 378
keV isomer (21 min) and the +580 Hz on the |
|