HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc
E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038
  nuclear two-photon decay, Page 9 of 12  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Category Subjectdown
  171   Thu Jul 1 17:01:43 2021 JacobusRunsFrequency shift
> The freqency suddenly shifted at time 16:11:47 and remained shifted until now 
> 
> The ESR status in the monitor stayed blue. No obvious sign that a magnet was down. The operators are checking
> 
> Sergey telephoned, he is also not sure but suggests stopping starting the ESR. We will wait for Yuri

In attachment, the moment when the shift occurred. 
Attachment 1: 245MHz-2021.07.01.16.12.03.686.tiq.png
245MHz-2021.07.01.16.12.03.686.tiq.png
  189   Fri Jul 2 01:31:35 2021 The remote Canadian beavers (Iris, Guy)AnalysisFirst spectra after bottle change
The first good spectra after the gas bottle change is from 23:38:25 (on the 410 MHz Analyzer) 
Attachment 1: 410MHz-2021.07.01.23.38.25.809.tiq.png
410MHz-2021.07.01.23.38.25.809.tiq.png
Attachment 2: 410MHz-2021.07.01.23.38.08.817.tiq.png
410MHz-2021.07.01.23.38.08.817.tiq.png
  93   Sun May 9 05:11:55 2021 Iris (Chris G., Jacobus, Michele)RunsFirst 52Mn run (no 52Mn unfortunately)
> Run E143-245 MHz-2021.05.09.01.17.42.265.tiq is the first run of the experiment on 52Mn.


And Run E143-410MHz-2021.05.09.03.27.37.368.tiq	from 2021-05-09 03:27 is the first run on the 410 MHz detector. Started a bit later than the 245 MHz detector.
 
  87   Sun May 9 02:19:04 2021 Jacobus, ShahabRunsFirst 52Mn run
Run E143-245 MHz-2021.05.09.01.17.42.265.tiq is the first run of the experiment on 52Mn.
  161   Wed Jun 30 20:58:06 2021 Ragan, HelenaGeneralFew minutes of disruption
There was a disruption from the SIS side for a few minutes.
  3   Tue May 4 13:26:40 2021 YuriSimulationsExpected spectrum 72Ge
A       Z      M/q                Int    difference in kHz@245MHz
68	30	2.263614752	35	-933.1
70	31	2.255131564	124	-457.0
36	16	2.247394703	1	-21.2
45	20	2.24726171	1	-13.7
81	36	2.247136805	1	-6.7
72	32	2.247041397	376	-1.3
72	32	2.247018215	376	0
63	28	2.246941324	1	4.3
54	24	2.246906236	1	6.3
74	33	2.239572482	568	420.9
65	29	2.238342523	100	490.5
76	34	2.232371568	62	829.3
67	30	2.230357529	100	943.7
69	31	2.222859086	172	1370.7
60	27	2.219224118	100	1578.3
62	28	2.211179746	100	2038.7
77	35	2.197207311	116	2842.5
  89   Sun May 9 02:45:50 2021 Jacobus, Michele, ShahabRunsExample of possible 52.Mn isomer
this is how it should look like
Attachment 1: 52Mn_002.PNG
52Mn_002.PNG
  90   Sun May 9 02:51:44 2021 IrisRunsExample of possible 52.Mn isomer
So the "isomers" pop up at ~-600 Hz and +580 Hz... is the -600 Hz on the left the 378 keV isomer (21 min) and the +580 Hz on the right the g.s.?
  91   Sun May 9 03:24:12 2021 Iris (Shahab, Jacobus, Chris G., Michele)RunsExample of possible 52.Mn isomer
Short update from Yuri: these are not our isomers. These are 45Sc (left, 12 keV isomer not resolvable) and 75Br (center), and the right-most peak of the triplet is a satellite (has a different line shape, much narrower).




> So the "isomers" pop up at ~-600 Hz and +580 Hz... is the -600 Hz on the left the 378 keV isomer (21 min) and the +580 Hz on the right the g.s.?
  51   Fri May 7 17:12:14 2021 Kanika, Sergey, Yuri, Wolfram, Michael, ShahabRunsEnergy change -6 MeV/u
changed the energy down to 435 MeV/u
  53   Fri May 7 17:35:22 2021 Kanika, Sergey, Yuri, Wolfram, Michael, ShahabRunsEnergy change +6 MeV/u
We will now go up in energy to 447 MeV (+6 MeV) from the original energy

last file name with previous energy:

245: 2021.05.07.16.33.47.178
410: 2021.07.05.17.34.04.780
  16   Thu May 6 21:26:02 2021 Yuri et al.AcceleratorEnergies
gamma_t = 1.3955
Br(72Ge) corresponds to 6.79575 Tm
E (Kr) at Br(72Ge) = 392.9 MeV/u
ESIS = 467.45 MeV/u (pre-drilling, after 1.8 g/cm2 target)
ESIS = 440.98 MeV/u (final energy for 72Ge)

-during setup, a 20 mm offset in the TE line was observed. Beam centered via changing the Br of the beamline (~4 MeV/u up). Optimized pre-drilling transmission ~20% (with thick target)
  133   Mon May 10 08:49:01 2021 Kanika, Alex, RuiJiuGeneralEnd of the measurement
The beam was stopped at about 08:40.
  211   Fri Jul 2 13:44:50 2021 Sergey, et alAcceleratorEl cooler
Up to now, attempts to cool the fat line between Se and Ar were conducted. We give up it now and remove cooling
  73   Sat May 8 10:51:41 2021 Akash, Nic, Jelena, ZsoltCalibrationESR settings seem different
Settings don't look the same...so we are not yet writing files unless sure.
Attachment 1: Screenshot_2021-05-08_at_10.50.23.png
Screenshot_2021-05-08_at_10.50.23.png
  14   Thu May 6 17:48:48 2021 W. Korten, HelmutGeneralESR setting for 72Ge ions with primary beam
Setting the 78Kr (after the target) to the Brho of the 72Ge beam at 368.4 MeV/u (gamma=1.3955), i.e. 6.79575 Tm, which leads to an energy of 392.93 (of 78Kr). 
With the 10mm Be target the beam energy should then be 467.8 MeV/u .
Yes, with my slightly different target thickenss 467.5 MeV/u (Helmut).

For 72Ge at this Brho after the target it then needs 440.95 MeV/u.
LISE in proj. fragmentation option Morissey for projectile energy loss and ATIMA 1.4 with Be 1839 mg/cm^2).
  42   Fri May 7 10:05:06 2021 YuriAcceleratorE02DS3HG does not drive
E02DS3HG stays at -35 mm and does not react
  159   Wed Jun 30 20:14:44 2021 Ragan, HelenaGeneralDrop in SIS intensity
There is a drop in SIS intensity and the operators are informed.
  12   Thu May 6 16:45:42 2021 Ragan, Rui-JiuDAQData taking with NTCAP
NTCAP is on and data taking has started.
On time: 16:39

SC_2021-05-06_16-39-09
\IQ_2021-05-06_16-39-09

IQ Rate: 20 MS/s
Carrier frequency: 245 MHz
Reference level(dBm):-30
RF attenuation(dB):40
IF attenuation(dB):19.9288

Data file
Samples/records:2^18=262144
Records/File:2^12=4096

SC file: 
Entries/file:2^18=262144

Master path:
o:\E143\iq 
o:\E143\sc
Attachment 1: 1.jpg
1.jpg
Attachment 2: 2.jpg
2.jpg
  32   Fri May 7 04:39:00 2021 Liliana, Akash, Wolfram, Helmut, ShahabRunsData taking starts
File start being recorded at 4:38 am 
Sync with the server is working. 

Be aware that the timestamp of the files is 1h behind with respect to real time
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b