| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Year |
Text |
 |
|
304
|
Sat May 1 22:34:16 2021 |
Jan Glorius | Calibration | efficiency xray 90deg | 2021 | the attached efficiency curve for the 90 deg.
xray detector is made with the runs
e127b_run0008.lmd
|
|
|
345
|
Sun May 16 12:55:48 2021 |
Jan Glorius | DAQ | event server lxg1299:6003 | 2021 | new event server is set up at lxg1299 on port
6003
It runs as:
|
|
|
233
|
Mon Mar 23 09:47:05 2020 |
Laszlo | General | explanation of an ESR cycle | | |
|
|
84
|
Fri Mar 20 16:48:00 2020 |
Laszlo | General | flipped Si shaper output in x and y | | Yesterday evening we have found out that the
energy signals from the silicon are negative
--> wrong polarity of the shapers was chosen |
|
|
134
|
Sat Mar 21 15:30:34 2020 |
Sergiy | General | go into the ESR | | We are going into the ESR to check the electronics.
Use calibration sources (133Ba etc). |
|
|
280
|
Thu Apr 30 22:55:45 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | inverse square law test | | I have made also the inverse square law fits.
We have data only for 90degre with the 241Am
source, but both for the 1. and 2. calibrations. |
|
|
439
|
Tue May 25 08:36:15 2021 |
Jan | General | lessons learned | 2021 | 1. before using stoch. cooling in ESR, boot
and update the windows PC
2. better diagnostics for low energy/intensity |
|
|
274
|
Wed Apr 8 23:02:24 2020 |
Laszlo | General | lmd to measurement pairing list | | I use the following list of lmd files combined
to a single root file for each measurement.
It is very important to highlight that sometimes |
|
|
6
|
Fri Apr 5 06:05:55 2019 |
Jan | DAQ | making changes to the DAQ | | If you need to add or change a module of the
VME crate you need to follow this proceedure:
|
|
|
269
|
Thu Mar 26 12:05:22 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | measurement of collimators | | The measurements were taken by using a caliper
ruler, with precision of +/-0.05mm |
|
|
368
|
Fri May 21 19:20:54 2021 |
Laszlo | General | misalignment in the pattern | 2021 | for some reason the event number of the target
ON and OFF was misaligned with the pattern.
This means that the last few runs (run53, |
|
|
47
|
Sun Mar 15 17:12:40 2020 |
Laszlo, Jan | Detectors | new Ortec spec amps | | We are now using new SpecAmps for the x-ray
detectors from ORTEC, they deliver much improved
resolution but have other strange effects |
|
|
135
|
Sat Mar 21 17:21:57 2020 |
Laszlo | General | new Target density | | Ulli and Nikos managed to set the target density
to ~7E13 at 51K temperature
|
|
|
395
|
Sat May 22 20:46:19 2021 |
Laszlo, Pierre.Michel, Enis | General | new scraper position | 2021 | The scraper was moved into 2.5mm in absolute
which corresponds to 20mm away from the beam
axis.
|
|
|
400
|
Sat May 22 22:29:48 2021 |
Laszlo, Pierre.Michel, Enis | General | new scraper position | 2021 | The scraper was moved into 7.5 mm in absolute
which corresponds to 25 mm away from the
beam axis.
|
|
|
225
|
Mon Mar 23 06:40:17 2020 |
Shahab | Runs | no beam in SIS nor in ESR | | manic Monday morning. |
|
|
258
|
Mon Mar 23 18:15:55 2020 |
Laszlo | General | noisy 90degree Xray det | | Uwe found out, that there was some common
ground effect between 90 and 145 degree detectors.
after moving the grounds, we could record |
|
|
Draft
|
Fri Aug 9 13:14:09 2019 |
Laszlo | | pn channel simulations for 111Sn(p,g)112Sb experiment | | The p,n channel opening for the 111Sn+p reaction
is at 5.8895 MeV/u beam energy. Therefore,
when choosing as 6MeV/u, 7MeV/u, 8MeV/u beam |
|
|
20
|
Fri Aug 9 13:43:15 2019 |
Laszlo | Simulations | pn channel simulations for 111Sn(p,g)112Sb experiment | | The p,n channel opening for 111Sn beam is
at 5.8895 MeV/u beam energy. Therefore, when
choosing 6MeV/u, 7MeV/u,
|
12x |
|
7
|
Wed Jun 5 11:29:13 2019 |
Jan | Detectors | position/channel calib. | | This is the first position calibration done
with the detector installed in the holder.
The goal is to assign rough positions (top/bottom/left/right) |
|