| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Year |
Text |
 |
|
38
|
Tue Mar 10 09:41:26 2020 |
Jan | Detectors | x-ray background from BaF | | The BaF2 detectors planned to be installed
at the target induce an additional background
in the x-ray detectors sitting below inside |
|
|
241
|
Mon Mar 23 12:30:39 2020 |
laszlo | Analysis | with and without scraper | | |
|
|
62
|
Wed Mar 18 09:53:28 2020 |
Laszlo, Jan | General | vacuum after opening gate valve | | Gate valve to DSSSD setup was opened on Tue
17.03. ~9:00
|
|
|
277
|
Thu Apr 23 19:09:58 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | theoretical K-REC cross sections | | Find attached Andrey Surzhykov's calculations
for the theta angle in respect to the beam
direction (in lab. frame) vs. cross section |
9x |
|
48
|
Sun Mar 15 17:13:21 2020 |
Laszlo, Jan | Calibration | the x-ray gate issue | | We found a strange behaviour of our ADC gates
for the x-ray detectors.
The setting as shown in the foto below corresponds |
|
|
291
|
Thu Apr 22 10:56:20 2021 |
Jan | Detectors | target-chamber det. distances | 2021 | This is the lookup table for the distance
of each x-ray detector to the target.
See attached foto for explanation.
|
|
|
130
|
Sat Mar 21 14:52:05 2020 |
Laszlo | General | target optimization | | previous position of the beam at target was
-3mm (for the night position)
max. intensity position of the beam at target |
|
|
68
|
Fri Mar 20 01:21:00 2020 |
Laszlo | General | target is switched on event based | | |
|
|
147
|
Sat Mar 21 21:36:06 2020 |
Jan | Runs | target incident | | in run 66 or 67 we had a single ESR cycle
for which the target didn't switch off for
new injection and deceleration etc.
|
|
|
201
|
Sun Mar 22 18:35:43 2020 |
Laszlo | | target dropped aagain | | there was a drop again from 8.6e13 to 7e13
in the target density |
|
|
361
|
Fri May 21 10:00:51 2021 |
Jan | Accelerator | target bump | 2021 | The target overlap was optimized on xray and
si rates.
The setting now is -10mm in SC9 |
|
|
198
|
Sun Mar 22 17:45:07 2020 |
Laszlo | General | switching to primary beam | | We have finished the measurement with the
fragments.
|
|
|
64
|
Thu Mar 19 15:09:29 2020 |
Jan | General | starting off with DSSSD | | here is my short guide how to start with the
measurement as soon as we have a beam available.
|
|
|
22
|
Wed Sep 25 13:03:46 2019 |
Laszlo | Analysis | simulations on 118Te+p | | I have made some simulations at 8AMeV, 7AMeV
and 4AMeV energies for the main 118Te + p
reaction channels. For the
|
11x |
|
360
|
Fri May 21 01:17:37 2021 |
Laszlo | Analysis | simple analysis code | 2021 | //a simple code (template) for offline analysis
//made by Laszlo, serves as a simple demonstration
for enthusiastic shifters
|
|
|
30
|
Thu Dec 5 10:57:57 2019 |
Jan, Laszlo | Detectors | setting up the DSSD with beam | | This is a brief how-to about getting the DSSSD
set up with stored beam and target in the
ESR.
|
|
|
244
|
Mon Mar 23 13:26:59 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | runs_90to99 SCRAPER RESULTS | | With scraper, we have roughly 150-200 (p,g)
counts now.
|
|
|
251
|
Mon Mar 23 14:32:03 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | runs_100to104 NO-SCRAPER RESULTS | | Without scraper, we have very few (p,g) counts,
hard to get numbers quickly, maybe ~50.
|
|
|
5
|
Fri Apr 5 05:46:20 2019 |
Jan | DAQ | running DRASI for (p,g) | | We now have a drasi DAQ running for our (p,g)
experiments.
The RIO we have it installed right now is: |
|
|
123
|
Sat Mar 21 12:06:50 2020 |
Laszlo | General | run61 - SCRAPER moved out | | we want to see any change on the Silicon count
rate, because we will have now also Rutherford
scattering. |
|