| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Year |
Text |
 |
|
253
|
Mon Mar 23 15:48:15 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run105 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 167.5mm, wrong? | | Detector: 90
Source: Am241
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
254
|
Mon Mar 23 16:17:58 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run106 - garbage! | | run106 was clicked by accident, please delete! |
|
|
255
|
Mon Mar 23 16:21:33 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run107 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 167.5mm | | Detector: 90
Source: Am241
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
256
|
Mon Mar 23 17:32:42 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run108 - Xray90 calib Ba133, distance 167.5mm - high rate - deadtime too high! | | Detector: 90
Source: Ba133 - strong source
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
257
|
Mon Mar 23 17:40:33 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run109 - Xray90 calib Ba133, distance 167.5mm -low rate | | Detector: 90
Source: Ba133 - weak source
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
259
|
Mon Mar 23 18:17:27 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run110 - Xray90 calib Ba133, distance 167.5mm -low rate - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 90
Source: Ba133 - weak source
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
267
|
Wed Mar 25 14:26:22 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run111 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 167.5mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 90
Source: 241Am
Distance: 167.5mm
|
|
|
260
|
Mon Mar 23 19:32:53 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run112 - Xray90 calib Am241, distance 200mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 90
Source: 241Am
Distance: 200mm
|
|
|
261
|
Mon Mar 23 20:52:37 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run113 - Xray145 calib Am241, distance 305mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 145
Source: 241Am
Distance: 305mm
|
|
|
262
|
Mon Mar 23 21:47:40 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run114 - Xray145 calib Ba133, distance 305mm - LESS NOISE | | Detector: 145
Source: 133Ba - strong source
Distance: 305mm
|
|
|
263
|
Mon Mar 23 22:25:41 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run115 - Xray35 Ba133 d=334mm, Xray90 Lead source, d=167.5mm | | Simultaneous measurement of Xray35 and Xray90.
The dead-time is <3%
|
|
|
264
|
Tue Mar 24 00:11:35 2020 |
Laszlo | Calibration | run116 - Xray35 calib AM241, distance 334mm | | Detector: 35
Source: 241Am
Distance: 334mm
|
|
|
123
|
Sat Mar 21 12:06:50 2020 |
Laszlo | General | run61 - SCRAPER moved out | | we want to see any change on the Silicon count
rate, because we will have now also Rutherford
scattering. |
|
|
5
|
Fri Apr 5 05:46:20 2019 |
Jan | DAQ | running DRASI for (p,g) | | We now have a drasi DAQ running for our (p,g)
experiments.
The RIO we have it installed right now is: |
|
|
251
|
Mon Mar 23 14:32:03 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | runs_100to104 NO-SCRAPER RESULTS | | Without scraper, we have very few (p,g) counts,
hard to get numbers quickly, maybe ~50.
|
|
|
244
|
Mon Mar 23 13:26:59 2020 |
Jan | Analysis | runs_90to99 SCRAPER RESULTS | | With scraper, we have roughly 150-200 (p,g)
counts now.
|
|
|
30
|
Thu Dec 5 10:57:57 2019 |
Jan, Laszlo | Detectors | setting up the DSSD with beam | | This is a brief how-to about getting the DSSSD
set up with stored beam and target in the
ESR.
|
|
|
360
|
Fri May 21 01:17:37 2021 |
Laszlo | Analysis | simple analysis code | 2021 | //a simple code (template) for offline analysis
//made by Laszlo, serves as a simple demonstration
for enthusiastic shifters
|
|
|
22
|
Wed Sep 25 13:03:46 2019 |
Laszlo | Analysis | simulations on 118Te+p | | I have made some simulations at 8AMeV, 7AMeV
and 4AMeV energies for the main 118Te + p
reaction channels. For the
|
11x |
|
64
|
Thu Mar 19 15:09:29 2020 |
Jan | General | starting off with DSSSD | | here is my short guide how to start with the
measurement as soon as we have a beam available.
|
|