ELOG E142

HOME ESR EXPERIMENTS LABS etc

E121 E127 E132 E125 E143 laser_cooling_2021 E142 Ê128 E146 E0052 E0018 E0028 E0038

Nuclear hyperfine mixing in 229Th89+, Page 1 of 12

Not logged in

Find | Login | Help

Full | Summary | Threaded | Collapse | Expand

233 Entries

Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 Next All

Sat Apr 2 01:27:25 2022, Jan Glorius, Runs, test runs 02.04.2022

Beam settings:
primary beam 
copper stripper
I_el=300mA
U_el=205.490kV (Ohm_labs)
3.5e7 ions at injection


MSCF/ADC settings: 
ch2 < Mid PMT x10
ch6 < Mid PMT x100
see attachment (setting_e142....) for detailed MSCF settings

Files/Runs [DAQ2]:

------------------new file-----------------
229Th0022.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40

no corresponding file in DAQ1

------------------new file-----------------
229Th0023.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5

file in DAQ1:
...7768.lmd

------------------new file-----------------
229Th0024.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: out (-127)
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5

file in DAQ1:
...7770.lmd

------------------new file-----------------
229Th0025.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan not:

VUPROM -> delay stop trigger ch12 

file in DAQ1:
no file

no laser scan

------------------new file-----------------
229Th0026.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5

VUPROM -> delay stop trigger ch12 

file in DAQ1:
...7772.lmd

Sun Apr 3 12:31:10 2022, Rui-Jiu Chen, Yuri, Carsten, Ragan, Runs, Measurement of beam with different circles 6x

Parameters of NTCAP:

1. IQ rate 20 MSamples/s
2. Carrier frequency: 245 MHz
3. RF attenuation(dB): 40
4. IF attenuation(dB): 19.9288

Data files:
Samples/record: 2^18=262144
Records/File:2^12=4096

Masterpath:
p:/E142/iq
p:/E142/sc

1. Manipulation 1:

(ESR EXP22 02 238U92 Brandau 30March22.C1.3 WAIT FOR MANIP BY. OF O)
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_11-37-01, SC_2022-04-03_11-37-01
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_11-46-54, SC_2022-04-03_11-47-04

2. Manipulation 2:

(ESR EXXP22 02.23U92 Brandau SOMarch22.CIS WAIT FOR MANI BY OP O )
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_11-56-17, SC_2022-04-03_11-56-17 (Reference level 0dBm)
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_12-03-27, SC_2022-04-03_12-03-27 (Reference level 0dBm)
Data C: IQ_2022-04-03_12-58-00, SC_2022-04-03_12-58-00 (Reference level -25dBm, record data
for long time.)\

3. Manipulation 3:

(ESR EXP22 02 23AUS2 Branda3OMarch22C1.7 WAIT FOR MANIP BY OP)
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_12-11-11, SC_2022-04-03_12-11-11 (Reference level 0dBm)
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_12-18-49, SC_2022-04-03_12-18-49 (Reference level 0dBm)

4. Manipulation 1+2+3. Measuring two injections.

Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_12-26-47, SC_2022-04-03_12-26-47(REFERENCEL LEVEL 0dBm)
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_12-26-55, SC_2022-04-03_12-26-55(Reference level -25dBm)

Preliminary result: comparison between manipulation (MP) 1,2,3 and full manipulation

Mon Apr 4 09:10:44 2022, Ragan, Yuri, Rui-Jiu, Runs, Measurement

NTCAP is taking data with the beam with a stop at manipulation 5 (taking all the fragments).

1)

Start time: 09:07
Stop time:  11:31

Reference level: -25 dBm

SC_2022-04-04_09-07-57
IQ_2022-04-04_09-07-57

2)

Start time: 11:35
Stop time:  14:00

Reference level: -25 dBm

SC_2022-04-04_11-35-25
IQ_2022-04-04_11-35-25

Tue Apr 5 23:55:11 2022, Carsten, Runs, Long time measurment with NTCAP

Settings:
Center: 2242.5MHz
RefLevel: -25dB
Rate 15 MIQs

File Numbers: 2022_04_05 23-46-22

Please note that the file started one minute earlier had wrong settings.

File contains also injection, paused in machine #5: ramped to central orbit / not yet bunched.
The measurement does not represent the later settings since here hte 229Th89+ is still on a too inner orbit (cf. previous post).

The beam settings can also be found in the previous post.

Wed Apr 6 14:52:29 2022, Rodolfo, Runs, Scraping the ion beam

We are T-scraping the ion beam.

Thu Apr 7 02:32:29 2022, all on shift, Runs, First Scans 322-320nm

Laser scanning from 322-320 steps 0.01nm/s
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ1	LMD-DAQ2
02.30	?	?	Th227781-Th227784	0027-0028
03.03	1.75e9	209648	7785-7787	0029-0030
03:28	1.7e9	209648	7788	0031 (stopped during scan)
Break - fixing cables, Elog ID: 125
04:00 - problems with UNILAC, stopping for now.
Apparently not so bad problems. we can continue.
Mesytek PS of xuv-detector crashed, can only be restarted from inside the ESR by turning the crate on and off.
05.20	1.23e9	209646	7791-7794	0035-0038
05.52	1.5e9	209648	7795-7797	0039-0042
06.24	1.5e9	209642	7798-7800	0043-0046	1 sec waiting at each laser frequency (dwell time 30)
07.36	xx e9	209 xx	7803-7804	0047-0050	problems with DAQ 1 and DAQ2
07.52	xx e9	209646	7805-7809	0051-0055	DAQs started again	5 sec waiting at each laser frequency (dwell time 150)
08.30	e9	209 xx	7810-78	0056-00	DAQs started again	5 sec waiting at each laser frequency (dwell time 150)

Fri Apr 8 06:53:29 2022, Ragan, Runs, NTCAP data taking

NTCAP is taking data since 07.04.2022 23:53:47

Carrier Frequency: 242.2 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30

SC_2022-04-07_23-53-47
\IQ_2022-04-07_23-53-47

Fri Apr 8 09:32:32 2022, Ragan, Runs, NTCAP stopped

Since there is no beam, NTCAP is stopped.

Carrier Frequency: 242.2 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30

SC_2022-04-07_23-53-47
\IQ_2022-04-07_23-53-47

Fri Apr 8 09:39:04 2022, Ragan, Runs, NTCAP started

Carrier Frequency: 242.2 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30

SC_2022-04-08_09-39-33
\IQ_2022-04-08_09-39-33

Fri Apr 8 10:44:55 2022, Ragan, Yuri, Danyal, Sergey, Runs, NTCAP stopped

NTCAP is stopped. Sergey will now set an ion bunch instead of two in the ESR.

SC_2022-04-08_09-39-33
\IQ_2022-04-08_09-39-33

Fri Apr 8 12:04:13 2022, Ragan, Runs, NTCAP started

NTCAP is started for the data taking.

Carrier Frequency: 242.02 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30

SC_2022-04-08_12-04-28
\IQ_2022-04-08_12-03-50

Fri Apr 8 15:39:36 2022, all, Runs, first data after timing set up

started taking data again

started at 15:40  
h=1  

file names 
229Th7821 DAQ 1  607 MB
229Th0082 DAQ 2  820 MB 

stopped at 16:25 


The laser was not really properly scanned. 
This was mainly a test run to see if everything was working.

Sat Apr 9 06:25:22 2022, Max, Kristian, Runs, morning shift runs

DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th

Shottky marker pos: 243.973MHz

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ1 start-end	LMD-DAQ2 start-end	scan range(nm)	step width(nm)	dwell time(s)	comments
xx:xx	x.xe9	209xxx	00xx	78xx	32x.x - 32x.x	0.01	x	sketch for filling the table
06:40	1.7e9	209619	0098-0099	7836	323.2 - 321.2	0.002	4s	laser pulse energy is @ ~12mJ after SHG
09:35	1.4e9	209624	0101-0101	7838-7838	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	only 0.5nm range, WM power + coupling tuned to scan range, Konstantin updated LV code to hold Cobra Set WL value, aborted LV readout problem
11:25	1.0e9	209622	0102 - 102	7839-7839	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	LV readout problem solved. WM readout is wrong (Cobra set is good)
12:15	old beam	209622	0103 - 103	7840-7840	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	WM readout is wrong
12:50	2.3e9	209617	0104 - 104	7841-7841	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	couldnt open go4 stream view, stopped after one good scan
13:20	2.0e9	209617	0104 - 105	7842-7842	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	first scan with LV correct

Sat Apr 9 13:45:42 2022, Max, Kristian, Runs, first scans with LV problem solved!

This is the first time with LV buffer problem solved (see Elog ID: 184). Before the PMT signals were out of sync with the wavelength data!
We concluded to scan with step sizes of 0.002nm, scan range of 0.5nm (f
nm), dwelltime = 150(5s), loops = 2 (approx.: 30min measurements).

DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th

Shottky marker pos: 243.973MHz

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ1 start-end	LMD-DAQ2 start-end	scan range(nm)	step width(nm)	dwell time(s)	comments
11:25	1.0e9	209622	0102 - 102	7839-7839	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	LV readout problem solved. WM readout is wrong (Cobra set is good)
12:15	old beam	209622	0103 - 103	7840-7840	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	WM readout is wrong
12:50	2.3e9	209617	0104 - 104	7841-7841	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	couldnt open go4 stream view, stopped after one good scan, WM readout is wrong .
13:20	2.0e9	209617	0104 - 105	7842-7842	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	first scan with LV correct
13:40	1.2e9	209618	0106 - 106	7843-7843	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	3 loops
14:20	1.5e9	209612	0107 - 107	7844-7844	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	3s	1 loop

Runs after this have the right cobra set value but propably the wrong WM data until 10.04.22 12:44 (see also ID:198)

Sat Apr 9 15:47:21 2022, Carsten, Rodolfo, Sarper, Patrick, Runs, Afternoon and night shift runs

After the morning shift, we got new increment (nm) for the laser scanning. We are now scanning 2 nm of wavelength range in 5 big steps (5 x 0.4 nm). Started with 323.2 nm - 322.8 nm range. Every big step (0.4 nm) is scanned with 0.002 nm of wavelength increment.

Every scan takes ~ 18 min (0.4 nm range with 0.002 nm steps), we have scanned 2 loops. Total scanning time ~36 min.

DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th

Schottky marker pos: 243.973MHz

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ1 start-end	LMD-DAQ2 start-end	scan range(nm)	step width(nm)	dwell time(s)	comments
xx:xx	x.xe9	209xxx	0xxx	78xx	32x.x - 32x.x	0.002	x	sketch for filling the table
15:14	1.5e9	209624	0111-0111	7847-7847	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	DAQ 2 no VUPROM TDC Pat south
xx:xx	1.5e9	209624	0111-0111	7847-7847	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	DAQ 2 changed TDC part south from ch 8 to ch 10
17:05	2.2e9	209624	0113-0113	7848-7848	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
19:04	1.8e9	209616	0116-0116	7850-7850	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	Intensity optimization, see below, DAQ 2 TDC part south back to channel 8 - ok, XUV detector and Cu mirror moved correctly, lost the laser beam after the half of the second loop
19:49	1.8e9	209614	0117-0117	7851-7851	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
20:28	2.0e9	209622	0118-0118	7852-7852	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
21:07	2.2e9	209623	0119-119	7853-7853	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
22:01	1.8e9	209621	0122-0122	7856-7856	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
22:41	?	209620	0123	7857	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	First scan started by night shift
23:21	1.1e9	209620	0124	7858	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	mbs crashed at 'sta ac'
23:32	1.3e9	209618	0125	7859	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	e-cooler turned off
23:50	1.5e9	209xxx	0126	7860	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	the stop point was not set
23:53	1.5e9	209611	0127	7861	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	DAQ2 must have crashed between 23:30 - 23:50
00:07	1.9e9	209xxx	0128	7862	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	mbs crashed at 'sta ac'
00:23	1.7e9	209623	0131	7864	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan. we 'resl' after every measurement from now on. 'open file' is included in '@startup' now (ID:190).
01:08	1.6e9	209623	0132	7865	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
01:47	1.6e9	209623	0133	7866	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
02:35	1.3e9	209623	0134	7868	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
03:19	2.0e9	209622	0135	7869	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
04:04	1.3e9	209622	0136	7870	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan
04:44	1.0e9	209622	0137	7871	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	e-cooler turned off
05:25	1.9e9	209622	0140	7875	323.2 - 322.8	0.002	5s	successful scan. DAQ1 was started ~7s before DAQ2. The files between the last measurement an this one are essentially empty.

Carsten (19:00h): I notized that a lot of beam gets lost when starting scraping. I called Sergey Litvinov to help me to introduce some additional cooling/waiting (10s) after the ramp and before scraping and bunching. It increased the number of ions available for the measurement roughly by a factor of 3-5.

Some runs have wrong WM data. Set Wavelength is good.

Following files are saved differently, the command missed the 229Th in the end (/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/229Thor -auto -rfio)
7850 (19:32)
7855 (21:56)
7856 (22:30)

Sun Apr 10 06:39:16 2022, Kristian, Marek, Max, Runs, runs morning shift 10.04.

These are the measurement runs of the morning shift (10.04.).

Time

SIS-intensity

cooler-HV

LMD-DAQ1 start-end

LMD-DAQ2 start-end

scan range(nm)

step width(nm)

dwell time(s)

comments

06:xx

3e8

2096xx

0141-0141

7876-7876

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

just one loop

06:39

2e9

209621

0142-0142

7877-7877

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

07:18

2.1e9

209616

0143-0143

7878-7878

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

8000 particles on counter

07:57

2.2e9

209621

0144-0144

7879-7879

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

08:37

1.9e9

209620

0145-0145

7880-7880

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

7200 particles on counter

09:24

2.1e9

209621

0146-0146

7881-7881

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

laser pulse energy @ start of run: 488mJ green monitor, 11.6mJ UV, 7700 particles on counte

10:07

2.1e9

209620

0147-0147

7882-7882

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

optimized WM coupling, the WM data is stretched in this run (buffer problem?), also possible for previous runs

11:04

2.1e9

209620

0148-0148

7884-7884

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

restarted WM, still wrong WM data, stopped after 1 run

11:27

2.1e9

209616

0149-0149

7885-7885

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

restarted WM + LV

12:11

2.0e9

209616

0150-0150

7886-7886

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

wrong WM data

12:55

1.9e9

209616

0151-0151

7887-7887

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

changed LV code (ID: 198), WM data works now!

13:37

1.8e9

209620

0152-0152

7888-7888

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

14:16

2.1e9

209621

0153-0153

7889-7889

323.2 - 322.8

0.002

1 loop

Sun Apr 10 15:16:19 2022, Carsten, Rodolfo, Sarper, Runs, Runs afternoon shifts 10.04

These are the measurement runs of the afternoon shift (10.04.).

Wavelength range is changed from 323.2 - 322.8 nm to 322.81 - 322.40 nm.

Time

SIS-intensity

cooler-HV

LMD-DAQ1 start-end

LMD-DAQ2 start-end

scan range(nm)

step width(nm)

dwell time(s)

comments

16:26

1.95e9

209620

0155-0155

7891-7891

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

laser scan did not work, labview (Thorium_main.vi) communication issue

16:51

1.8e9

209620

0156-0156

7892-7892

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

17:33

1.6e9

209618

0157-0157

7893-7893

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

7894 particles on the counter

18:17

1.6e9

209618

0158-0158

7894-7894

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

8200 particles on the counter

19:06

1.8e9

209618

0159-0159

7895-7895

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

8650 particles on the counter

19:44

1.9e9

209618

0160-0160

7896-7896

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

8600 particles on the counter

20:24

1.7e9

209620

0161-0161

7897-7897

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

4200 particles on the counter

21:04

1.7e9

209619

0162-0162

7898-7898

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

8380 particles on the counter

21:45

1.8e9

209619

0163-0163

7899-7899

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

8550 particles on the counter

22:24

1.8e9

209619

0164-0164

7900-7900

322.81 - 322.40

0.002

8016 particles on the counter

Sun Apr 10 22:47:05 2022, Patrick, Volker, Prannay, Danyal, Alexandre, Sebastian, Kristian, Runs, Runs night shift 10.04 + morning shift 11.04

These are the measurement runs of the night shift (10/11.04.).

Wavelength range is still 322.81 - 322.40 nm.

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ1 start-end	LMD-DAQ2 start-end	scan range(nm)	step width(nm)	dwell time(s)	particles counted	comments
23:05	1.75e9	209620	0165 - 0165	7901-7901	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8500
23:57	1.?e9	209620	0166 - 0166	7902-7902	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8500	The HV of PMT south was changed from 2.5kV to 3kV
00:35	1.4e9	209620	0167 - 0167	7903-7903	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	4100
01:18	1.75e9	209620	0168 - 0168	7904-7904	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	4400
01:58	1.4e9	209620	0169 - 0169	7905-7905	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	7700	The ESR went red after this run. The on-call service was called because of some power supply failure, ETA: 45min.
04:12	1.75e9	209620	0171 - 0171	7906-7906	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	7600	With the start of this run, the wavemeter, labview and the python script were restarted. The python script was slightly adjusted.
04:50	1.6e9	209620	0172 - 0172	7907-7907	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8300
05:31	1.6e9	209619	0173 - 0173	7908-7908	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8100
06:09	1.6e9	209615	0174 - 0174	7909-7909	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8000
06:52	1.8e9	209615	0175 - 0175	7910-7910	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8800	at 07:08 the cooler voltage jumped from 209615 V to 209619 V
07:30	1.9e9	209619	0176 - 0176	7911-7911	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	forgotten	at 07:50 the cooler voltage jumped from 209619 to 209610 V and back again at to 209619 V
08:18	1.8e9	209619	0177 - 0177	7912-7912	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	9100	08:47 the cooler voltage jumped from 209618 to 209614 V and back again at to 209618 V
08:55	1.75e9	209619	0178 - 0178	7913-7913	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8300
09:36	1.6e9	209619	0179 - 0179	7914-7914	322.81 - 322.40	0.002	5s	8194

The SIS intensity is taken directly before injection to ESR. Not the SIS peak intensity as in yesterday's table.

Mon Apr 11 14:45:11 2022, Paul, Konstantin, Sarper, David, Runs, Afternoon shift runs 11.04

We continue scan the new wavelength scan range is 322.41 - 322.00 nm

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ1 file nr	LMD-DAQ2 file nr	scan range(nm)	step width(nm)	dwell time(s)	particles counted	comments
14:45	1.9e9	209618	0189	7924	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	9100
18:54	1.83e9	209616	0191	7926	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7300
19:34	1.7e9	209615	0192	7927	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7110
20:13	1.8e9	20961X	0193	7928	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	6730
20:53	1.8e9	209614	0194	7929	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7550	During the scan the ecooler voltage changed to approximately 209613
21:43	1.7e9	209614	0195	7931	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7000
22:30	1.6e9	209612	0197	7932	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7300
23:10	1.4e9	209614	0198	7933	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	6100	For this measurement, ESR_Ring went red, we realized only after completing the measurement. The sections went red are Dipole Correction Points (GE01KP17-18-19-20, 4 in total) @~23:45 and fixed @01:35...
01:52	1.6e9	209614	0199	7934	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7151
02:32	1.7e9	209616	0200	7935	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	8368
03:22	1.8e9	209617	0201	7936	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s	7005
04:01	1.9e9	209616	0202	7937	322.41 - 322.00	0.002	5s		Ecooler voltage increased 4 volts during the run

Tue Apr 12 04:43:29 2022, Alexandre, Kristian, Sebastian, Runs, 322.01 - 321.60 nm

We scan the wavelength scan range is 322.01 - 321.60 nm

before the first scan of the new wavelength range we changed the high voltage divider ratio in Labview from 248514 to 248517, which is the correct value for this voltage. This leads to slightly higher cooler voltages in the log.

Time	SIS-intensity	cooler-HV	LMD-DAQ2 file nr	LMD-DAQ1 file nr	scan range(nm)	step width(nm)	dwell time(s)	particles counted	comments
04:40	1.9e9	209625	0203	7938	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	8830
05:20	1.7e9	209626	0204	7939	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	7800
06:00	1.6e9	209626	0205	7940	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	8500
06:45	1.7e9	209620	0206	7941	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	9400	cooler HV decreased slowly by a few V, jumped back at ~7:03
07:25	1.8e9	209620	0207	7942	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	9300
08:05	1.75e9	209620	0208	7943	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	9100
08:45	1.7e9	209618	0209	7944	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	9000	cooler HV decreased 5V to 209614 and jumped back to initial value after ~5s
09:25	1.7e9	209618	0210	7945	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	8500
10:05	1.9e9	209618	0211	7946	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	9200	cooler HV decreased steadily to 209611 V during the run
10:45	1.9e9	209611	0212	7947	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	7500	After injecting into the ESR, we saw after cooling some tails left and right of the Shottky peak of Th. Was not there in the runs before. After some minutes it disappeared in the spectrum
11:35	2e9	209611	0213	7948	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s		it seems to be that much lesser ions are stored in the ESR - counter shows low rate - ABORTED laser didn't start scanning
11:58	1.75e9	209615	0214	7949	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	7700	cooler HV jumped to 209610 at 12:12 and stayed there
12:53	1.85e9	209611	0215	7950	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	7155	cooler HV increased slowly from initial value to ~209618
13:32	1.9e9	209612	0216	7951	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	6638
14:39	1.8e9	209610	0217	7952	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	6815	Voltage was jumping around from 209610 up to 209624 and back
15:20	1.75e9	209612	0218	7953	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	8400	In contrast to the previous measurement, the cooler voltage was drifting by about 3V around 209612
16:00	1.7e9	209612	0219	7954	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	7920
16:58	1.5e9	209612	0220	7955	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	4577	PMT North voltage and threshold modified Entry 221, Ecooler voltage dcreased to 209609 V, weak injection
18:09	1.62e9	209609	0221	7957	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s		During the last injection the beam suddenly got lost during the scraping, File 7956 was discarded since go4 was still during the startup of mbs
18:49	1.69e9	209609	0222	7958	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	6133
19:49	1.6e9	209610	0223	7959	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	7035
20:29	1.78e9	209611	0224	7960	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	4490
21:12	1.86e9	209622	0225	7961	322.01 - 321.60	0.002	5s	10296	Note that the cooler voltage is increased. Particle number might be overestimated since it was read when the beam was already dumped.

Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12 Next All

ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b