ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
62
|
Sat Apr 2 01:27:25 2022 |
Jan Glorius | Runs | test runs 02.04.2022 |
Beam settings:
primary beam
copper stripper
I_el=300mA
U_el=205.490kV (Ohm_labs)
3.5e7 ions at injection
MSCF/ADC settings:
ch2 < Mid PMT x10
ch6 < Mid PMT x100
see attachment (setting_e142....) for detailed MSCF settings
Files/Runs [DAQ2]:
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0022.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
no corresponding file in DAQ1
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0023.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5
file in DAQ1:
...7768.lmd
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0024.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: out (-127)
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5
file in DAQ1:
...7770.lmd
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0025.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan not:
VUPROM -> delay stop trigger ch12
file in DAQ1:
no file
no laser scan
------------------new file-----------------
229Th0026.lmd
bunched beam [ESR in manip. at 7]
beam scraped using detector drives
-SA pos: 0
-NA pos: -10
-Ni pos: 40
laser scan active:
- steps: 21
- cycles: 5
VUPROM -> delay stop trigger ch12
file in DAQ1:
...7772.lmd |
Attachment 1: setting_e142.1648855568
|
1648855568
Sat Apr 2 01:26:08 CEST 2022
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getGainCommon 15
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getShapingTimeCommon 0
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThresholdCommon 200
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPzCommon 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getGain1 15
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getGain2 10
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getGain3 15
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getGain4 15
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getShapingTime1 0
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getShapingTime2 0
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getShapingTime3 0
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getShapingTime4 1
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold1 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold2 2
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold3 200
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold4 200
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold5 222
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold6 2
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold7 200
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold8 200
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold9 222
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold10 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold11 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold12 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold13 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold14 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold15 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshold16 255
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz1 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz2 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz3 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz4 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz5 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz6 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz7 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz8 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz9 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz10 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz11 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz12 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz13 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz14 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz15 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getPz16 100
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getSingleChMode 1
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getRcMode 1
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getAutoPZ 18
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getMultiplicityHi 8
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getMultiplicityLo 0
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getSumTrgThresh 18
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getBlrOn 1
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getCoincTime 121
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getThreshOffset 70
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getShaperOffset 35
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getBlrThresh 25
e127pi:mrcc:mscf2:getECLDelay 18
|
78
|
Sun Apr 3 12:31:10 2022 |
Rui-Jiu Chen, Yuri, Carsten, Ragan | Runs | Measurement of beam with different circles |
Parameters of NTCAP:
1. IQ rate 20 MSamples/s
2. Carrier frequency: 245 MHz
3. RF attenuation(dB): 40
4. IF attenuation(dB): 19.9288
Data files:
Samples/record: 2^18=262144
Records/File:2^12=4096
Masterpath:
p:/E142/iq
p:/E142/sc
1. Manipulation 1:
(ESR EXP22 02 238U92 Brandau 30March22.C1.3 WAIT FOR MANIP BY. OF O)
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_11-37-01, SC_2022-04-03_11-37-01
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_11-46-54, SC_2022-04-03_11-47-04
2. Manipulation 2:
(ESR EXXP22 02.23U92 Brandau SOMarch22.CIS WAIT FOR MANI BY OP O )
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_11-56-17, SC_2022-04-03_11-56-17 (Reference level 0dBm)
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_12-03-27, SC_2022-04-03_12-03-27 (Reference level 0dBm)
Data C: IQ_2022-04-03_12-58-00, SC_2022-04-03_12-58-00 (Reference level -25dBm, record data
for long time.)\
3. Manipulation 3:
(ESR EXP22 02 23AUS2 Branda3OMarch22C1.7 WAIT FOR MANIP BY OP)
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_12-11-11, SC_2022-04-03_12-11-11 (Reference level 0dBm)
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_12-18-49, SC_2022-04-03_12-18-49 (Reference level 0dBm)
4. Manipulation 1+2+3. Measuring two injections.
Data A: IQ_2022-04-03_12-26-47, SC_2022-04-03_12-26-47(REFERENCEL LEVEL 0dBm)
Data B: IQ_2022-04-03_12-26-55, SC_2022-04-03_12-26-55(Reference level -25dBm)
Preliminary result: comparison between manipulation (MP) 1,2,3 and full manipulation
|
Attachment 1: 202204031422502.jpg
|
|
Attachment 2: 202204031422501.jpg
|
|
Attachment 3: 20220403142250.jpg
|
|
Attachment 6: Comparison_between_manipulations.pdf
|
|
86
|
Mon Apr 4 09:10:44 2022 |
Ragan, Yuri, Rui-Jiu | Runs | Measurement |
NTCAP is taking data with the beam with a stop at manipulation 5 (taking all the fragments).
1)
Start time: 09:07
Stop time: 11:31
Reference level: -25 dBm
SC_2022-04-04_09-07-57
IQ_2022-04-04_09-07-57
2)
Start time: 11:35
Stop time: 14:00
Reference level: -25 dBm
SC_2022-04-04_11-35-25
IQ_2022-04-04_11-35-25 |
104
|
Tue Apr 5 23:55:11 2022 |
Carsten | Runs | Long time measurment with NTCAP |
Settings:
Center: 2242.5MHz
RefLevel: -25dB
Rate 15 MIQs
File Numbers: 2022_04_05 23-46-22
Please note that the file started one minute earlier had wrong settings.
File contains also injection, paused in machine #5: ramped to central orbit / not yet bunched.
The measurement does not represent the later settings since here hte 229Th89+ is still on a too inner orbit (cf. previous post).
The beam settings can also be found in the previous post. |
110
|
Wed Apr 6 14:52:29 2022 |
Rodolfo | Runs | Scraping the ion beam |
We are T-scraping the ion beam. |
121
|
Thu Apr 7 02:32:29 2022 |
all on shift | Runs | First Scans 322-320nm |
Laser scanning from 322-320 steps 0.01nm/s
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 | LMD-DAQ2
|
02.30 | ? | ? | Th227781-Th227784 | 0027-0028
|
03.03 | 1.75e9 | 209648 | 7785-7787 | 0029-0030
|
03:28 | 1.7e9 | 209648 | 7788 | 0031 (stopped during scan)
|
Break - fixing cables, Elog ID: 125
|
04:00 - problems with UNILAC, stopping for now.
|
Apparently not so bad problems. we can continue.
|
Mesytek PS of xuv-detector crashed, can only be restarted from inside the ESR by turning the crate on and off.
|
05.20 | 1.23e9 | 209646 | 7791-7794 | 0035-0038
|
05.52 | 1.5e9 | 209648 | 7795-7797 | 0039-0042
|
06.24 | 1.5e9 | 209642 | 7798-7800 | 0043-0046 | 1 sec waiting at each laser frequency (dwell time 30)
|
07.36 | xx e9 | 209 xx | 7803-7804 | 0047-0050 | problems with DAQ 1 and DAQ2
|
07.52 | xx e9 | 209646 | 7805-7809 | 0051-0055 | DAQs started again | 5 sec waiting at each laser frequency (dwell time 150)
|
08.30 | e9 | 209 xx | 7810-78 | 0056-00 | DAQs started again | 5 sec waiting at each laser frequency (dwell time 150)
|
|
|
151
|
Fri Apr 8 06:53:29 2022 |
Ragan | Runs | NTCAP data taking |
NTCAP is taking data since 07.04.2022 23:53:47
Carrier Frequency: 242.2 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30
SC_2022-04-07_23-53-47
\IQ_2022-04-07_23-53-47 |
Attachment 1: IMG_0936.jpg
|
|
155
|
Fri Apr 8 09:32:32 2022 |
Ragan | Runs | NTCAP stopped |
Since there is no beam, NTCAP is stopped.
Carrier Frequency: 242.2 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30
SC_2022-04-07_23-53-47
\IQ_2022-04-07_23-53-47 |
157
|
Fri Apr 8 09:39:04 2022 |
Ragan | Runs | NTCAP started |
Carrier Frequency: 242.2 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30
SC_2022-04-08_09-39-33
\IQ_2022-04-08_09-39-33 |
158
|
Fri Apr 8 10:44:55 2022 |
Ragan, Yuri, Danyal, Sergey | Runs | NTCAP stopped |
NTCAP is stopped. Sergey will now set an ion bunch instead of two in the ESR.
SC_2022-04-08_09-39-33
\IQ_2022-04-08_09-39-33 |
161
|
Fri Apr 8 12:04:13 2022 |
Ragan | Runs | NTCAP started |
NTCAP is started for the data taking.
Carrier Frequency: 242.02 M
IQ Rate (S/s): 10 M
Reference level (dBm): -30
SC_2022-04-08_12-04-28
\IQ_2022-04-08_12-03-50 |
Attachment 1: IMG_0947.jpg
|
|
166
|
Fri Apr 8 15:39:36 2022 |
all | Runs | first data after timing set up |
started taking data again
started at 15:40
h=1
file names
229Th7821 DAQ 1 607 MB
229Th0082 DAQ 2 820 MB
stopped at 16:25
The laser was not really properly scanned.
This was mainly a test run to see if everything was working. |
181
|
Sat Apr 9 06:25:22 2022 |
Max, Kristian | Runs | morning shift runs |
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th
Shottky marker pos: 243.973MHz
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
xx:xx | x.xe9 | 209xxx | 00xx | 78xx | 32x.x - 32x.x | 0.01 | x | sketch for filling the table
|
06:40 | 1.7e9 | 209619 | 0098-0099 | 7836 | 323.2 - 321.2 | 0.002 | 4s | laser pulse energy is @ ~12mJ after SHG
|
09:35 | 1.4e9 | 209624 | 0101-0101 | 7838-7838 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | only 0.5nm range, WM power + coupling tuned to scan range, Konstantin updated LV code to hold Cobra Set WL value, aborted LV readout problem
|
11:25 | 1.0e9 | 209622 | 0102 - 102 | 7839-7839 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | LV readout problem solved. WM readout is wrong (Cobra set is good)
|
12:15 | old beam | 209622 | 0103 - 103 | 7840-7840 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | WM readout is wrong
|
12:50 | 2.3e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 104 | 7841-7841 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | couldnt open go4 stream view, stopped after one good scan
|
13:20 | 2.0e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 105 | 7842-7842 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | first scan with LV correct
|
|
183
|
Sat Apr 9 13:45:42 2022 |
Max, Kristian | Runs | first scans with LV problem solved! |
This is the first time with LV buffer problem solved (see Elog ID: 184). Before the PMT signals were out of sync with the wavelength data!
We concluded to scan with step sizes of 0.002nm, scan range of 0.5nm (f
nm), dwelltime = 150(5s), loops = 2 (approx.: 30min measurements).
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th
Shottky marker pos: 243.973MHz
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
11:25 | 1.0e9 | 209622 | 0102 - 102 | 7839-7839 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | LV readout problem solved. WM readout is wrong (Cobra set is good)
|
12:15 | old beam | 209622 | 0103 - 103 | 7840-7840 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | WM readout is wrong
|
12:50 | 2.3e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 104 | 7841-7841 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | couldnt open go4 stream view, stopped after one good scan, WM readout is wrong .
|
13:20 | 2.0e9 | 209617 | 0104 - 105 | 7842-7842 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | first scan with LV correct
|
13:40 | 1.2e9 | 209618 | 0106 - 106 | 7843-7843 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | 3 loops
|
14:20 | 1.5e9 | 209612 | 0107 - 107 | 7844-7844 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 3s | 1 loop
|
Runs after this have the right cobra set value but propably the wrong WM data until 10.04.22 12:44 (see also ID:198) |
185
|
Sat Apr 9 15:47:21 2022 |
Carsten, Rodolfo, Sarper, Patrick | Runs | Afternoon and night shift runs |
After the morning shift, we got new increment (nm) for the laser scanning. We are now scanning 2 nm of wavelength range in 5 big steps (5 x 0.4 nm). Started with 323.2 nm - 322.8 nm range. Every big step (0.4 nm) is scanned with 0.002 nm of wavelength increment.
Every scan takes ~ 18 min (0.4 nm range with 0.002 nm steps), we have scanned 2 loops. Total scanning time ~36 min.
DAQ1: lxg1927:/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/
DAQ2: lxg0155:/data.local2/E142/
LMD file name DAQ1:229Thor
LMD file name DAQ2:229Th
Schottky marker pos: 243.973MHz
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
xx:xx | x.xe9 | 209xxx | 0xxx | 78xx | 32x.x - 32x.x | 0.002 | x | sketch for filling the table
|
15:14 | 1.5e9 | 209624 | 0111-0111 | 7847-7847 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | DAQ 2 no VUPROM TDC Pat south
|
xx:xx | 1.5e9 | 209624 | 0111-0111 | 7847-7847 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | DAQ 2 changed TDC part south from ch 8 to ch 10
|
17:05 | 2.2e9 | 209624 | 0113-0113 | 7848-7848 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
19:04 | 1.8e9 | 209616 | 0116-0116 | 7850-7850 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | Intensity optimization, see below, DAQ 2 TDC part south back to channel 8 - ok, XUV detector and Cu mirror moved correctly, lost the laser beam after the half of the second loop
|
19:49 | 1.8e9 | 209614 | 0117-0117 | 7851-7851 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
20:28 | 2.0e9 | 209622 | 0118-0118 | 7852-7852 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
21:07 | 2.2e9 | 209623 | 0119-119 | 7853-7853 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
22:01 | 1.8e9 | 209621 | 0122-0122 | 7856-7856 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
22:41 | ? | 209620 | 0123 | 7857 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | First scan started by night shift
|
23:21 | 1.1e9 | 209620 | 0124 | 7858 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | mbs crashed at 'sta ac'
|
23:32 | 1.3e9 | 209618 | 0125 | 7859 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | e-cooler turned off
|
23:50 | 1.5e9 | 209xxx | 0126 | 7860 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | the stop point was not set
|
23:53 | 1.5e9 | 209611 | 0127 | 7861 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | DAQ2 must have crashed between 23:30 - 23:50
|
00:07 | 1.9e9 | 209xxx | 0128 | 7862 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | mbs crashed at 'sta ac'
|
00:23 | 1.7e9 | 209623 | 0131 | 7864 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan. we 'resl' after every measurement from now on. 'open file' is included in '@startup' now (ID:190).
|
01:08 | 1.6e9 | 209623 | 0132 | 7865 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
01:47 | 1.6e9 | 209623 | 0133 | 7866 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
02:35 | 1.3e9 | 209623 | 0134 | 7868 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
03:19 | 2.0e9 | 209622 | 0135 | 7869 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
04:04 | 1.3e9 | 209622 | 0136 | 7870 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan
|
04:44 | 1.0e9 | 209622 | 0137 | 7871 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | e-cooler turned off
|
05:25 | 1.9e9 | 209622 | 0140 | 7875 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | successful scan. DAQ1 was started ~7s before DAQ2. The files between the last measurement an this one are essentially empty.
|
Carsten (19:00h): I notized that a lot of beam gets lost when starting scraping. I called Sergey Litvinov to help me to introduce some additional cooling/waiting (10s) after the ramp and before scraping and bunching. It increased the number of ions available for the measurement roughly by a factor of 3-5.
Some runs have wrong WM data. Set Wavelength is good.
Following files are saved differently, the command missed the 229Th in the end (/data.local2/BeamTimeTh22/229Thor -auto -rfio)
7850 (19:32)
7855 (21:56)
7856 (22:30) |
195
|
Sun Apr 10 06:39:16 2022 |
Kristian, Marek, Max | Runs | runs morning shift 10.04. |
These are the measurement runs of the morning shift (10.04.).
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
06:xx | 3e8 | 2096xx | 0141-0141 | 7876-7876 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | just one loop
|
06:39 | 2e9 | 209621 | 0142-0142 | 7877-7877 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
07:18 | 2.1e9 | 209616 | 0143-0143 | 7878-7878 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | 8000 particles on counter
|
07:57 | 2.2e9 | 209621 | 0144-0144 | 7879-7879 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
08:37 | 1.9e9 | 209620 | 0145-0145 | 7880-7880 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | 7200 particles on counter
|
09:24 | 2.1e9 | 209621 | 0146-0146 | 7881-7881 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | laser pulse energy @ start of run: 488mJ green monitor, 11.6mJ UV, 7700 particles on counte
|
10:07 | 2.1e9 | 209620 | 0147-0147 | 7882-7882 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | optimized WM coupling, the WM data is stretched in this run (buffer problem?), also possible for previous runs
|
11:04 | 2.1e9 | 209620 | 0148-0148 | 7884-7884 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | restarted WM, still wrong WM data, stopped after 1 run
|
11:27 | 2.1e9 | 209616 | 0149-0149 | 7885-7885 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | restarted WM + LV
|
12:11 | 2.0e9 | 209616 | 0150-0150 | 7886-7886 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | wrong WM data
|
12:55 | 1.9e9 | 209616 | 0151-0151 | 7887-7887 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | changed LV code (ID: 198), WM data works now!
|
13:37 | 1.8e9 | 209620 | 0152-0152 | 7888-7888 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
14:16 | 2.1e9 | 209621 | 0153-0153 | 7889-7889 | 323.2 - 322.8 | 0.002 | 5s | 1 loop |
200
|
Sun Apr 10 15:16:19 2022 |
Carsten, Rodolfo, Sarper | Runs | Runs afternoon shifts 10.04 | These are the measurement runs of the afternoon shift (10.04.).
Wavelength range is changed from 323.2 - 322.8 nm to 322.81 - 322.40 nm.
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | comments
|
16:26 | 1.95e9 | 209620 | 0155-0155 | 7891-7891 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | laser scan did not work, labview (Thorium_main.vi) communication issue
|
16:51 | 1.8e9 | 209620 | 0156-0156 | 7892-7892 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s |
|
17:33 | 1.6e9 | 209618 | 0157-0157 | 7893-7893 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 7894 particles on the counter
|
18:17 | 1.6e9 | 209618 | 0158-0158 | 7894-7894 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8200 particles on the counter
|
19:06 | 1.8e9 | 209618 | 0159-0159 | 7895-7895 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8650 particles on the counter
|
19:44 | 1.9e9 | 209618 | 0160-0160 | 7896-7896 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8600 particles on the counter
|
20:24 | 1.7e9 | 209620 | 0161-0161 | 7897-7897 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 4200 particles on the counter
|
21:04 | 1.7e9 | 209619 | 0162-0162 | 7898-7898 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8380 particles on the counter
|
21:45 | 1.8e9 | 209619 | 0163-0163 | 7899-7899 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8550 particles on the counter
|
22:24 | 1.8e9 | 209619 | 0164-0164 | 7900-7900 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8016 particles on the counter |
203
|
Sun Apr 10 22:47:05 2022 |
Patrick, Volker, Prannay, Danyal, Alexandre, Sebastian, Kristian | Runs | Runs night shift 10.04 + morning shift 11.04 | These are the measurement runs of the night shift (10/11.04.).
Wavelength range is still 322.81 - 322.40 nm.
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 start-end | LMD-DAQ2 start-end | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | particles counted | comments
|
23:05 | 1.75e9 | 209620 | 0165 - 0165 | 7901-7901 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8500 |
|
23:57 | 1.?e9 | 209620 | 0166 - 0166 | 7902-7902 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8500 | The HV of PMT south was changed from 2.5kV to 3kV
|
00:35 | 1.4e9 | 209620 | 0167 - 0167 | 7903-7903 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 4100 |
|
01:18 | 1.75e9 | 209620 | 0168 - 0168 | 7904-7904 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 4400 |
|
01:58 | 1.4e9 | 209620 | 0169 - 0169 | 7905-7905 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 7700 | The ESR went red after this run. The on-call service was called because of some power supply failure, ETA: 45min.
|
04:12 | 1.75e9 | 209620 | 0171 - 0171 | 7906-7906 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 7600 | With the start of this run, the wavemeter, labview and the python script were restarted. The python script was slightly adjusted.
|
04:50 | 1.6e9 | 209620 | 0172 - 0172 | 7907-7907 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8300 |
|
05:31 | 1.6e9 | 209619 | 0173 - 0173 | 7908-7908 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8100 |
|
06:09 | 1.6e9 | 209615 | 0174 - 0174 | 7909-7909 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8000 |
|
06:52 | 1.8e9 | 209615 | 0175 - 0175 | 7910-7910 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8800 | at 07:08 the cooler voltage jumped from 209615 V to 209619 V
|
07:30 | 1.9e9 | 209619 | 0176 - 0176 | 7911-7911 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | forgotten | at 07:50 the cooler voltage jumped from 209619 to 209610 V and back again at to 209619 V
|
08:18 | 1.8e9 | 209619 | 0177 - 0177 | 7912-7912 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 9100 | 08:47 the cooler voltage jumped from 209618 to 209614 V and back again at to 209618 V
|
08:55 | 1.75e9 | 209619 | 0178 - 0178 | 7913-7913 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8300 |
|
09:36 | 1.6e9 | 209619 | 0179 - 0179 | 7914-7914 | 322.81 - 322.40 | 0.002 | 5s | 8194 |
|
The SIS intensity is taken directly before injection to ESR. Not the SIS peak intensity as in yesterday's table. |
210
|
Mon Apr 11 14:45:11 2022 |
Paul, Konstantin, Sarper, David | Runs | Afternoon shift runs 11.04 | We continue scan the new wavelength scan range is 322.41 - 322.00 nm
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | particles counted | comments
|
14:45 | 1.9e9 | 209618 | 0189 | 7924 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 9100 |
|
18:54 | 1.83e9 | 209616 | 0191 | 7926 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7300 |
|
19:34 | 1.7e9 | 209615 | 0192 | 7927 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7110 |
|
20:13 | 1.8e9 | 20961X | 0193 | 7928 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 6730 |
|
20:53 | 1.8e9 | 209614 | 0194 | 7929 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7550 | During the scan the ecooler voltage changed to approximately 209613
|
21:43 | 1.7e9 | 209614 | 0195 | 7931 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7000 |
|
22:30 | 1.6e9 | 209612 | 0197 | 7932 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7300 |
|
23:10 | 1.4e9 | 209614 | 0198 | 7933 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 6100 | For this measurement, ESR_Ring went red, we realized only after completing the measurement. The sections went red are Dipole Correction Points (GE01KP17-18-19-20, 4 in total) @~23:45 and fixed @01:35...
|
01:52 | 1.6e9 | 209614 | 0199 | 7934 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7151 |
|
02:32 | 1.7e9 | 209616 | 0200 | 7935 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 8368 |
|
03:22 | 1.8e9 | 209617 | 0201 | 7936 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | 7005 |
|
04:01 | 1.9e9 | 209616 | 0202 | 7937 | 322.41 - 322.00 | 0.002 | 5s | | Ecooler voltage increased 4 volts during the run
|
|
215
|
Tue Apr 12 04:43:29 2022 |
Alexandre, Kristian, Sebastian | Runs | 322.01 - 321.60 nm | We scan the wavelength scan range is 322.01 - 321.60 nm
before the first scan of the new wavelength range we changed the high voltage divider ratio in Labview from 248514 to 248517, which is the correct value for this voltage. This leads to slightly higher cooler voltages in the log.
Time | SIS-intensity | cooler-HV | LMD-DAQ2 file nr | LMD-DAQ1 file nr | scan range(nm) | step width(nm) | dwell time(s) | particles counted | comments
|
04:40 | 1.9e9 | 209625 | 0203 | 7938 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 8830 |
|
05:20 | 1.7e9 | 209626 | 0204 | 7939 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7800 |
|
06:00 | 1.6e9 | 209626 | 0205 | 7940 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 8500 |
|
06:45 | 1.7e9 | 209620 | 0206 | 7941 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 9400 | cooler HV decreased slowly by a few V, jumped back at ~7:03
|
07:25 | 1.8e9 | 209620 | 0207 | 7942 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 9300 |
|
08:05 | 1.75e9 | 209620 | 0208 | 7943 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 9100 |
|
08:45 | 1.7e9 | 209618 | 0209 | 7944 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 9000 | cooler HV decreased 5V to 209614 and jumped back to initial value after ~5s
|
09:25 | 1.7e9 | 209618 | 0210 | 7945 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 8500 |
|
10:05 | 1.9e9 | 209618 | 0211 | 7946 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 9200 | cooler HV decreased steadily to 209611 V during the run
|
10:45 | 1.9e9 | 209611 | 0212 | 7947 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7500 | After injecting into the ESR, we saw after cooling some tails left and right of the Shottky peak of Th. Was not there in the runs before. After some minutes it disappeared in the spectrum
|
11:35 | 2e9 | 209611 | 0213 | 7948 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | | it seems to be that much lesser ions are stored in the ESR - counter shows low rate - ABORTED laser didn't start scanning
|
11:58 | 1.75e9 | 209615 | 0214 | 7949 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7700 | cooler HV jumped to 209610 at 12:12 and stayed there
|
12:53 | 1.85e9 | 209611 | 0215 | 7950 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7155 | cooler HV increased slowly from initial value to ~209618
|
13:32 | 1.9e9 | 209612 | 0216 | 7951 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6638 |
|
14:39 | 1.8e9 | 209610 | 0217 | 7952 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6815 | Voltage was jumping around from 209610 up to 209624 and back
|
15:20 | 1.75e9 | 209612 | 0218 | 7953 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 8400 | In contrast to the previous measurement, the cooler voltage was drifting by about 3V around 209612
|
16:00 | 1.7e9 | 209612 | 0219 | 7954 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7920 |
|
16:58 | 1.5e9 | 209612 | 0220 | 7955 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 4577 | PMT North voltage and threshold modified Entry 221, Ecooler voltage dcreased to 209609 V, weak injection
|
18:09 | 1.62e9 | 209609 | 0221 | 7957 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | | During the last injection the beam suddenly got lost during the scraping, File 7956 was discarded since go4 was still during the startup of mbs
|
18:49 | 1.69e9 | 209609 | 0222 | 7958 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 6133 |
|
19:49 | 1.6e9 | 209610 | 0223 | 7959 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 7035 |
|
20:29 | 1.78e9 | 209611 | 0224 | 7960 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 4490 |
|
21:12 | 1.86e9 | 209622 | 0225 | 7961 | 322.01 - 321.60 | 0.002 | 5s | 10296 | Note that the cooler voltage is increased. Particle number might be overestimated since it was read when the beam was already dumped.
|
|
|
Attachment 1: DriftingVoltage14-40.PNG
|
|
|
ELOG V3.1.5-fc6679b |