ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
41
|
Wed May 11 07:28:39 2022 |
Simon, Christopher, Shahab | General | DAQ Loop for shifters | Procedure:
- Scanning phase ends (on LabView wait until |
|
48
|
Wed May 11 22:04:30 2022 |
Phillip, Wilfried, Max | General | spacial laser - ion overlap verified | After the SIS/ESR optimization we checked
the spatial overlap with the T-scrapers again.
|
|
50
|
Wed May 11 22:45:22 2022 |
Max, Wilfried, Patrick | General | scanning wavelength | The scan parameters for the next shift are:
in COBRACONTROL:
|
|
56
|
Thu May 12 10:21:30 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | No Beam | There is no beam in the ESR due to some problem
in the UNILAC. |
|
57
|
Thu May 12 11:30:18 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | Beam is back | Beam is back in the ESR. |
|
58
|
Thu May 12 11:31:11 2022 |
Simon, Christopher, Shahab, Wilfried, Sebastian, Ragan | General | Runs morning shift |
[TABLE border="1"]
Time | SIS-intensity | ESR-intensity after |
|
59
|
Thu May 12 12:02:56 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | No beam | There is no beam in the ESR again. |
|
60
|
Thu May 12 12:51:30 2022 |
Ragan, Shahab, Simon, Sebastian, Christopher, Wilfried | General | Beam is back | 12:50 Beam is back again in the ring.
12:52-until now Kicker problem in the ESR. |
 |
68
|
Fri May 13 16:55:58 2022 |
Danyal, Carsten, Phillip, Wilfried | General | End of E128 Beamtime | Dear all,
unfortunately, the E128 experiment must now |
|
69
|
Mon May 16 14:20:05 2022 |
Ragan, Danyal, Carsten, Phillip, Wilfried et al. | General | E128 Beamtime | > Dear all,
>
> unfortunately, the E128 experiment must |
|
72
|
Mon May 16 17:38:38 2022 |
Max, Danyal, Wilfried, Rodolfo | General | laser bunch timing | We overlapped the laser and ion bunch in the
time domain.
Therefore we delayed the bunching HF in order |
|
91
|
Mon May 30 19:00:19 2022 |
Carsten | General | Scraper Settings and Parameters for the last measrements with thick target | old Bunch frequency: 1.98777 MHz
Positions PL devices:
|
|
94
|
Mon May 30 21:52:08 2022 |
Wilfried, Danyal, David, Rodolfo | General | Position of T-Scrapers | We have determined the position of the H-like
208Bi ion beam using the T-Scrapers. The
position actually did not change in comparison |
|
98
|
Tue May 31 15:19:58 2022 |
Max, Carsten, Danyal | General | scans for different E-cool currents |
until 15:15 we have measured with I_e = 100
mA (3 loops per file)
|
|
99
|
Tue May 31 17:22:09 2022 |
Max, Carsten, Danyal, Rodolfo, Wilfried | General | change E-cooler current I_e = 50 mA |
At 17:15 we changed again the E-cooler current
I_e = 50 mA
|
|
6
|
Tue Apr 26 18:15:19 2022 |
Rodolfo | Detectors | XUV-Detector and Cu-Mirror | Concerning the moveable detectors:
- I have switched off the power supply and |
|
14
|
Fri May 6 16:29:03 2022 |
Simon, Patrick | Detectors | PMT preparation | We changed PMT north and PMT south and tested
them at 1500 V.
|
|
19
|
Mon May 9 16:58:41 2022 |
Carsten | Detectors | Voltage particle dectectors NA_SZ und SA_SZ switched on | Voltage SA_SZ (capture behind cooler): 1500
V (thin plastic scintillator)
Voltage NA_SZ (capture behind target): 750V |
|
29
|
Tue May 10 20:35:42 2022 |
Phillip, Wilfried, Max | Detectors | PMT Threshold | Since we have ions in the ring now, we looked
at the PMT thresholds and the widths. In
order to do so we looked at the Raw Signal |
|
45
|
Wed May 11 18:00:40 2022 |
Wilfried, Phillip, Max | Detectors | double PD NO peak problem solved | In entry 36 one finds an additional PD NO
peak around bin 100.
This was caused by signal reflection in the |
|