| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
230
|
Sat Jul 3 06:48:38 2021 |
The remote Canadian eager beavers (Guy & Iris) | Analysis | Closer potential isomer tracks | After looking through >800 shots from Jul
2nd 21h to Jul 3rd 05h, we couldn't find
a single example of a "smoking gun" isomer |
|
|
233
|
Sat Jul 3 07:35:31 2021 |
The remote Canadian eager beaver (Iris) | Analysis | Closer potential isomer tracks | Here's a list of the spectra to look at for
the potential isomer, taken btw 21:00 on
July 2nd and 6:30 on July 3rd. Two examples |
|
|
127
|
Mon May 10 04:08:13 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 245 MHz | > Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I
analysed 11 ms time slices separated by 25
ms to see the evolution of the potential |
|
|
128
|
Mon May 10 05:25:29 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before, but for 410 MHz detectors.
Peaks visible in the 3rd-5th slice.
|
8x |
|
130
|
Mon May 10 06:22:15 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 1-2am on 410 MHz | Same as before but for 4-5am on 410 MHz detector.
Peak visible.
|
9x |
|
132
|
Mon May 10 07:13:20 2021 |
Iris (Chris C., Jeff C.) | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 10th 5-6am on 410 MHz | Same as before for 5-6 am.
Peak still there, maybe a bit less than before.
|
9x |
|
108
|
Sun May 9 17:39:21 2021 |
Guy | Analysis | Comparison between 72Ge: 7th 19h vs 8th 21h | Following Xiangcheng Chen's analysis, I analysed
11 ms time slices separated by 25 ms to see
the evolution of the potential isomer across |
|
|
112
|
Sun May 9 20:34:47 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | Analysis | Comparison of frequency spectrum between 72Ge and other isotope | This some preliminary analysis results by
using NTCAP data. The IQ rate of NTCAP
is 20 MSamples/seconds. I analyzed data files |
6x |
|
24
|
Fri May 7 01:49:03 2021 |
Rui-Jiu Chen | DAQ | Comparison of I_Raw/Q_Raw between different reference level | This is a comparison of I_Raw/Q_Raw between
different reference level. The range of NTCAP
ADC is only 2^15 bit. So signals (I_Raw and |
|
|
17
|
Thu May 6 21:36:04 2021 |
Regina + Markus + Yuri | Accelerator | Cooler Curve | Final cooler curve, Isochronous 78Kr |
|
|
154
|
Wed Jun 30 14:48:54 2021 |
Oliver | General | Data taking - and not... | We just started data taking. But a few minutes
later the main experiment needed to do some
adjustements to the beam. This interrupts |
|
|
32
|
Fri May 7 04:39:00 2021 |
Liliana, Akash, Wolfram, Helmut, Shahab | Runs | Data taking starts | File start being recorded at 4:38 am
Sync with the server is working.
|
|
|
12
|
Thu May 6 16:45:42 2021 |
Ragan, Rui-Jiu | DAQ | Data taking with NTCAP | NTCAP is on and data taking has started.
On time: 16:39
|
|
|
159
|
Wed Jun 30 20:14:44 2021 |
Ragan, Helena | General | Drop in SIS intensity | There is a drop in SIS intensity and the operators
are informed. |
|
|
42
|
Fri May 7 10:05:06 2021 |
Yuri | Accelerator | E02DS3HG does not drive | E02DS3HG stays at -35 mm and does not react |
|
|
14
|
Thu May 6 17:48:48 2021 |
W. Korten, Helmut | General | ESR setting for 72Ge ions with primary beam | Setting the 78Kr (after the target) to the
Brho of the 72Ge beam at 368.4 MeV/u (gamma=1.3955),
i.e. 6.79575 Tm, which leads to an energy |
|
|
73
|
Sat May 8 10:51:41 2021 |
Akash, Nic, Jelena, Zsolt | Calibration | ESR settings seem different | Settings don't look the same...so we are not
yet writing files unless sure. |
|
|
211
|
Fri Jul 2 13:44:50 2021 |
Sergey, et al | Accelerator | El cooler | Up to now, attempts to cool the fat line between
Se and Ar were conducted. We give up it now
and remove cooling |
|
|
133
|
Mon May 10 08:49:01 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, RuiJiu | General | End of the measurement | The beam was stopped at about 08:40. |
|
|
16
|
Thu May 6 21:26:02 2021 |
Yuri et al. | Accelerator | Energies | gamma_t = 1.3955
Br(72Ge) corresponds to 6.79575 Tm
E (Kr) at Br(72Ge) = 392.9 MeV/u
|
|