| ID |
Date |
Author |
Category |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
182
|
Thu Jul 1 21:35:15 2021 |
Shahab | DAQ | increase factor 4 in power for 410 | increase factor 4 in power for 410
|
|
|
54
|
Fri May 7 18:08:35 2021 |
Kanika, Sergey, Yuri, Wolfram, Michael, Shahab | Runs | going back to the original energy | going back to the original energy 441 MeV/u
last filenames with the previous energy:
|
|
|
131
|
Mon May 10 06:35:58 2021 |
Kanika, Alex, Shahab | Runs | going back to shot by shot recording with 410 detector | going back to shot by shot recording with
410 detector |
|
|
64
|
Sat May 8 01:33:25 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | frequency list for 70Se setting | EXCEL table with all possible fragments injected
into ESR.
The path length in ESR, gamma_t and harmonic |
|
|
1
|
Fri Apr 23 13:47:55 2021 |
Jan Glorius | Collaboration | experiment proposal | |
|
|
198
|
Fri Jul 2 05:08:16 2021 |
Guy Leckenby (Canadian beaver team) | Analysis | e143_analyser.py Summing Script | I've written two scripts that others might
find useful for the on-line analysis.
1. The first is a simple bash script that |
|
|
206
|
Fri Jul 2 12:18:35 2021 |
Pavlos, Alexandre | Accelerator | e-cooling | Sergey Litvinov will now try to setup the
e-cooler to cool the beam in the ESR.
The data taking has been stopped (except |
|
|
191
|
Fri Jul 2 01:39:51 2021 |
IK, KK | Runs | drop of intensity |
We see a drop in beam intensity from 7E9
to 2E8 between 01:30 and 01:43 |
|
|
194
|
Fri Jul 2 03:10:03 2021 |
IK, KK | Runs | drop of intensity | We see that intensity stabalized at 9E8 which
is smaller then before.
We neticed this at 2:50, keep observing. |
|
|
195
|
Fri Jul 2 03:19:49 2021 |
IK, KK | Runs | drop of intensity |
And the intensity is back again to 5E9 at
03:20 |
|
|
156
|
Wed Jun 30 15:21:44 2021 |
Shahab | Runs | data synch on WWW server | Data is being shared on the WWW server.
Time difference between the analyzers is
in order of seconds:
|
|
|
5
|
Tue May 4 18:25:31 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | cutting of primary beam | The slits at TE4 and TE5 can be used to cut
away the unwanted 78Kr beam (see pictures).
We do not want activation of the beamline. |
|
|
6
|
Tue May 4 21:49:04 2021 |
Helmut Weick | Simulations | cut Brho by scrapers | The dispersion from the production target
into the ESR is not matched.
This is not good for momentum acceptance, |
|
|
137
|
Tue Jun 29 10:32:10 2021 |
Sergey, Helmut | Accelerator | cooler curves for tuning of isochronicity | Variation of quadrupole E01QS03D to change
gamma_t in isoc. mode
measured with 78Kr at 368.5 MeV/u on 28.06.2021 |
|
|
110
|
Sun May 9 18:50:23 2021 |
Helmut, Wolfram, Yuri | Accelerator | changed to 70Se | 18:45 changed SIS, ESR setting for 70Se without
predrilling blind change.
E-SIS = 446.55 MeV/u, is centerd as before |
|
|
138
|
Tue Jun 29 20:13:58 2021 |
Helmut, Sergey, Yuri | Accelerator | change to predrilling an 72Ge | After optimisation of sextupoles we found
a scraper position which makes a narrow peak
and keeps 20% of the injected beam.
|
|
|
115
|
Sun May 9 22:31:23 2021 |
Helmut, Wolfram, Yuri | Accelerator | change to 72Ge | we change back to 72Ge
just change SIS-energy E = 441.0 MeV/u
beamline energy after target E = 392.9 MeV/u
|
|
|
86
|
Sun May 9 01:49:25 2021 |
Helmut, Sergey, Yuri | Accelerator | change to 52Mn |
It was done in steps:
isochronous 52Mn should come at Brho = 6.28239 |
|
|
55
|
Fri May 7 18:43:13 2021 |
Kanika, Michael, Shahab | Runs | cave M experiment needs more spills | our pattern causes beam loss while scanning
the biological probes in the Cave M bio experiment.
They loose every other spill due to high |
|
|
59
|
Fri May 7 22:00:36 2021 |
Chris | Accelerator | brief beam loss | Brief interruption in beam, ~21:42-21:51. |
|